Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As I was reading the iPhone 6S's supported intra-band CA band list, I noticed that 25-25 was on it. This made me wonder - in the markets that sprint has an additional B25 carrier, do they plan on aggregating it with the G-Block carrier to essentially deliver the speed of a 10x10 setup?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

Why wouldn't they want too. I don't know what the technological downsides would be if any but otherwise i don't see the point in not doing it. Its another way to boost speeds

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't they want too. I don't know what the technological downsides would be if any but otherwise i don't see the point in not doing it. Its another way to boost speeds

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

 

3GPP Rel 11/12/13

 

Sprints PCS equipment is not capable, yet. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3GPP Rel 11/12/13

 

Sprints PCS equipment is not capable.

Ah got it. I did read something about band 41/25 and band 41/26 CA. Is sprints equipment able to to do and if so does sprint have an e.t.a on when

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah got it. I did read something about band 41/25 and band 41/26 CA. Is sprints equipment able to to do and if so does sprint have an e.t.a on when

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

 

3GPP Rel 13.

 

The technology is not even done in the developement phase. Nevermind having the hardware for it. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wouldn't they want too. I don't know what the technological downsides would be if any but otherwise i don't see the point in not doing it. Its another way to boost speeds

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

It's not a want thing. The release of LTE they deployed B25 with does not support CA. It will take an upgrade of the B25 network to do it. And with the other priorities on the front burner, I don't see them going through this trouble any time soon.

 

Using Tapatalk on BlackBerry Z30

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started typing my response long before all the replies. But my wife was distracting me for awhile. :)

 

Using Tapatalk on BlackBerry Z30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a forum or explanation on this site of what rel is. Ive never heard it before until now but i don't know what it is

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

http://www.unwiredinsight.com/2012/3gpp-lte-releases

 

 

 

Using Tapatalk on BlackBerry Z30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to increase the bandwidth for band 25 doesnt need carrier CA. Sprint has 10x10 on band 25 in a couple of cities ive even heard that chicago might get it. Sprint should do CA where its band25/26. dont see that happening tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to increase the bandwidth for band 25 doesnt need carrier CA. Sprint has 10x10 on band 25 in a couple of cities ive even heard that chicago might get it. Sprint should do CA where its band25/26. dont see that happening tho.

10x10 nationwide would require shutting down a large chunk of the CDMA network, which Sprint isn't ready to do. Sprint currently cannot do CA with B25+B26 because that CA must be officially certified first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think B26 should not be aggregated with any other Band. In order for a user to use CA on B26 and any other Band, that means they could be using another Band altogether. And no one should be on B26 except for people who have no choice because they have no other LTE signal available. B26 is wasted to aggregate. It will never be useful to anyone else who can't use anything but B26.

 

B25 carrier aggregation could be useful with other B25 carriers. When Sprint can do this in the future, it will be useful.

 

However B25+B41 CA is also unnecessary and wasteful. Because if someone is in range of B41, there is no sense in them wasting B25 resources. They might as well be on B41 solely and possibly even let their device aggregate them with another B41 carrier. B41+B41 will always be better than B41+B25.

 

Using Tapatalk on BlackBerry Z30

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10x10 nationwide would require shutting down a large chunk of the CDMA network, which Sprint isn't ready to do. Sprint currently cannot do CA with B25+B26 because that CA must be officially certified first.

yep I know. vzw had to do that. atleast thin out 3G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think B26 should not be aggregated with any other Band. In order for a user to use CA on B26 and any other Band, that means they could be using another Band altogether. And no one should be on B26 except for people who have no choice because they have no other LTE signal available. B26 is wasted to aggregate. It will never be useful to anyone else who can't use anything but B26.

 

B25 carrier aggregation could be useful with other B25 carriers. When Sprint can do this in the future, it will be useful.

 

However B25+B41 CA is also unnecessary and wasteful. Because if someone is in range of B41, there is no sense in them wasting B25 resources. They might as well be on B41 solely and possibly even let their device aggregate them with another B41 carrier. B41+B41 will always be better than B41+B25.

 

Using Tapatalk on BlackBerry Z30

So are you saying band 25 would with CA if more useful when and, if sprint ever has a 4th LTE band in the future?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand. I think Sprint needs to do something about speeds for users who aren't close enough to receive B41 if Marcelo is serious about becoming the #1 or #2 network. Doesn't T-Mobile have CA on B12? Not sure.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand. I think Sprint needs to do something about speeds for users who aren't close enough to receive B41 if Marcelo is serious about becoming the #1 or #2 network. Doesn't T-Mobile have CA on B12? Not sure.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

 

Tmo may have the ability to run B12 CA through its network and devices, but it also actively shunts people on B12 over to B4 if they are in range of it.  They aren't going to let people who can use another band (that is much wider) waste resources on B12.  

 

You say that Sprint should do something about speeds for users who aren't close enough to receive B41.  The best thing they can do is kick people off B26 who could be using B25 or B41.  When B26 only has users on it that are only in overage of that band, B26 performs pretty darn well.  And if aggressively managed, it could run 10-30Mbps in most instances.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Quote from wsj; "The T-Mobile deal could be reached as soon as later this month, while discussions with Verizon on a separate transaction are expected to take longer or might not result in an agreement, the people said." "The rising value of wireless licenses is a driving force behind the deal. U.S. Cellular’s spectrum portfolio touches 30 states and covers about 51 million people, according to regulatory filings." https://specmap.sequence-omega.net/
    • From WSJ which is paywalled but they're reporting that T-Mobile and Verizon are working on a joint deal to buy and split up U.S. Cellular. https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/t-mobile-verizon-in-talks-to-carve-up-u-s-cellular-46d1e5e6?st=qwngrnh4s3bcr76 — — — — —  Summary from a user in the Reddit thread:  
    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...