Jump to content

Petition to Stop T-Mobile from "Exaggerating" Data usage


KD8JBF

Recommended Posts

Just got an email from Change.org on this....Find it kind of funny....Figured i'd share....Shame on Magenta....LOL...

 

https://www.change.org/petitions/t-mobile-us-inc-t-mobile-stop-reporting-false-data-usage?utm_source=action_alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=116665

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this means anything, but Sprint has a totally different data usage number than I do, as calculated by my phone. Of course, I'm not sure if the phone can be trusted, but what other way is there to track it, other than at the device side or the network side?

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this means anything, but Sprint has a totally different data usage number than I do, as calculated by my phone. Of course, I'm not sure if the phone can be trusted, but what other way is there to track it, other than at the device side or the network side?

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

 

I really don't think there is any other way to track it other than what your device says it uses or what Sprint/T-Mo/Etc. tells you....And really how accurate can it be? The phone may miss some data being passed, but is what the carrier is counting as used data really what you've used? Who/What do you trust?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Un-carrier:  un-derhanded, un-fair, un-ethical, un-trustworthy, un-scrupulous, un-accurate.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this means anything, but Sprint has a totally different data usage number than I do, as calculated by my phone. Of course, I'm not sure if the phone can be trusted, but what other way is there to track it, other than at the device side or the network side?

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

 

I use the feature in AVG's widget to have another comparison of how much data I'm using. It seems pretty close to my phone/Sprint's tracker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T tends to count my data usage less every month than Android says I use. As long as AT&T is equal or less, I don't feel concerned.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint normally comes under or close to my phones report. Verizon however, comes in way under. Verizon often says I've used several hundred mbs less than my phone reports.

I meant to add to my original post that Verizon always comes in under what my device says, as does AT&T. I just checked my Sprint account again and it is dead-on now. Strange.

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant to add to my original post that Verizon always comes in under what NY device says as does AT&T. I just checked my Sprint account again and it is dead-on now. Strange.

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

I wonder if Verizon is significantly compressing data then.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this means anything, but Sprint has a totally different data usage number than I do, as calculated by my phone. Of course, I'm not sure if the phone can be trusted, but what other way is there to track it, other than at the device side or the network side?

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

 

internet speed meter lite

 

I don't know if it will be any different or accurate than the built android data meter, but at least it will be another point of reference.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...