Jump to content

Greetings LTE nutters


Azimuth

Recommended Posts

'Sup LTE friends. My name is Pete and I hail from the land of lions and zebra and live in a place called Johannesburg. Unlike a lot of my fellow countrymen, I'm not much into wildlife but rather into wild mobile broadband.

My current obsession is all things LTE from the technology itself, to link distances, to base stations, to operator equipment, to end user speed tests and experiences. I also have a special interest in LTE outdoor antennas.

What is LTE like on this side of the world? Well, I'm currently subscribed to a FDD LTE Band 3 operator and my daily speeds are 20-30Mbps down, 20Mbps up, with 30-40ms pings. For pure speed achievement, I've had up to 73Mbps with a TDD Band 40 operator while using dual LPDA antennas. The link distance in both cases is 1622m with clear LOS. LTE is quite prevalent here with the end of our operator trials about 18 months ago. We now have 3 of our "Big 4"operators offering LTE services. (2 FDD, 1 TDD).

What makes me tick? I have a passion for wireless which has led me to following the cellular industry in recent times. I'm a self-confessed Apple fan boy BUT I have owned many an Android device. On the photography side of things, I'm a Canon DSLR user. I'm also a parent to a 1yr old boy who consumes 80% of my free time. :D Lately I'm also into base station photography and have a newly acquired 300mm lens.

My home network consists of a LTE CPE, which feeds into a Ubiquiti ToughSwitch Pro, which in turn feeds into 3 UniFi LR access points and 1 NanoStation M 100m wireless bridge. I have 1 UniFi Outoor+ AP that isn't commissioned yet.

I came across your forum while doing research on sector antennas and found some pretty hardcore information, with lots of related topics. That was the beginning of the end as they say...and here I am.

Edit: a recent LTE installation I did...

5egyze3y.jpg

5uhaju3e.jpg

asare7a6.jpg

aruvaqys.jpg

4ynu6eha.jpg

a6ubeta8.jpg

zu7a7a4a.jpg

  • Like 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes me tick? I have a passion for wireless which has led me to following the cellular industry in recent times. I'm a self-confessed Apple fan boy BUT I have owned many an Android device. On the photography side of things, I'm a Canon DSLR user. I'm also a parent to a 1yr old boy who consumes 80% of my free time. :D Lately I'm also into base station photography and have a newly acquired 300mm lens.

 

Welcome Here! I have to ask, could you post some pictures of your local carrier equipment? I'm curious how similar the equipment looks, how clear are the installs, and the works.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh boy, you need not have asked. I'm busy unloading my DSLR and then be prepared. :P

 

I actually would love help identifying all the equipment e.g. LTE vs GSM vs WiMAX sectors since there's low interest back home. Our cell operators are very secretive with everything they do. Even though they frequent forums back home, they don't share anything.

 

I know we use Powerwave and Huawei sectors; I'm sure there's the other usual suspects as well. I did 3 photo shoots on Sunday so have plenty to show 'n tell.

Edited by Azimuth
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh boy, you need not have asked. I'm busy unloading my DSLR and then be prepared. :P

I actually would love help identifying all the equipment e.g. LTE vs GSM vs WiMAX sectors since there's low interest back home. Our cell operators are very secretive with everything they do. Even though they frequent forums back home, they don't share anything.

I know we use Powerwave and Huawei sectors; I'm sure there's the other usual suspects as well. I did 3 photo shoots on Sunday so have plenty to show 'n tell.

Well maybe we could help share the love of Equipment identification. Powerwave is used here as well, as well as others. What frequencies is Wimax run on over there?

 

Just a heads up I know I've seen DSLR pictures, unedited, be very large, so if possible resize them to smaller size if large. Keeps mobile users from too much scrolling :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sure. I'm not a WiMAX user and don't have much inside info. I'm guessing our operators use the 2500MHz-5800MHz range - pretty sure it's 5500-5800.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well maybe we could help share the love of Equipment identification. Powerwave is used here as well, as well as others. What frequencies is Wimax run on over there?

 

Just a heads up I know I've seen DSLR pictures, unedited, be very large, so if possible resize them to smaller size if large. Keeps mobile users from too much scrolling :P

I'll probably go with 640*480 forum wide? Is that okay to use here?

 

While waiting for those photos, a quick post of my own LTE link:

 

ysu9azu3.jpg

 

dy8ytage.jpg

 

uqa7ehet.jpg

 

Pictured:

 

- 1622m link distance (zoomed in with a 300mm lens)

- 100Mbps tower with TDD and FDD operator

- Cross-polarised dual element 9dBi MIMO LTE antenna

 

Not pictured:

 

- -77dBm RSRP after antenna installation

 

Of late I'm seeing bad download performance that is a fraction of my usual speeds while uploads remain unaffected. I've reported the base station so hope that things come right soon.

Edited by Azimuth
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll probably go with 640*480 forum wide? Is that okay to use here?

While waiting for those photos, a quick post of my own LTE link

Pictured:

- 1622m link distance (zoomed in with a 300mm lens)

- 100Mbps tower with TDD and FDD operator

- Cross-polarised dual element 9dBi MIMO LTE antenna

Not pictured:

- -77dBm RSRP after antenna installation

Of late I'm seeing bad download performance that is a fraction of my usual speeds while uploads remain unaffected. I've reported the base station so hope that things come right soon.

Good size, AJ(wiwavelength) should be proud :P Well maybe if you are closer to it, try snapping closer pics, maybe of the base station. But that tower has 3 carrier, 1 on too, 2 lower attached directly to the monopole?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's one of the base stations I included on my Sunday shoot.

 

At the base station there's one large BTS shelter with the main operator identifier but they host a second, smaller operator.

 

This is why I need to learn more about the sector equipment, was pretty sure only two operators were on the tower. Come to think of it, I saw a strange meter named after another operator and wondered what that was all about...

 

I'll post the close-ups ASAP. Which section should I use?

Edited by Azimuth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll post the close-ups ASAP. Which section should I use?

 

As everyone else has said :welcome:

 

Moving topic to the network forums for you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be happy to start a new topic there if you want to leave my intro here?

 

Already moved it for you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to our gathering of nerds, just a warning we're a bit odd. Well alright I'm odd and most everyone else seems to be, but take it with a grain of salt. So you live in the land of zebra's, would you happen to know how much shipping runs on a live specimen? My neighbor owns some odd animals and I'd like to one up him. Plus I like zebra's who doesn't, they're a camouflaged animal that makes zero sense:P.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to our gathering of nerds, just a warning we're a bit odd. Well alright I'm odd and most everyone else seems to be, but take it with a grain of salt. So you live in the land of zebra's, would you happen to know how much shipping runs on a live specimen? My neighbor owns some odd animals and I'd like to one up him. Plus I like zebra's who doesn't, they're a camouflaged animal that makes zero sense:P.

Uhhh...S4GRU doesn't want to be linked in your exploits to traffic exotic animals.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL well said Admin. I forgot to add to my opening, #1 pet hate is animal cruelty. Pretty sure koji is just being odd though. :P (Thanks for the welcome koji)

Edited by Azimuth
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll probably go with 640*480 forum wide? Is that okay to use here?

Quick question since I see a good few DSLR users here...I've been using Tapatalk for years; there's no need for image management since Tapatalk has their own image servers.

 

Who to use for DSLR images? I hate temporary image servers or ones that mess up your links (dead links across a forum are an eye sore). Is Photobucket still good?

Edited by Azimuth
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick question since I see a good few DSLR users here...I've been using Tapatalk for years; there's no need for image management since Tapatalk has their own image servers.

 

Who to use for DSLR images? I hate temporary image servers or ones that mess up your links (dead links across a forum are an eye sore). Is Photobucket still good?

 

Photobucket, imgur and Dropbox to name a few. Just gotta make sure you resize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imgur, as far as I know, is one of the nasties that sheds photos.

 

Why must I resize? I'll have another reason for my 20Mbps upload. :P

Edited by Azimuth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imgur, as far as I know, is one of the nasties that sheds photos.

 

Why must I resize? I'll have another reason for my 20Mbps upload. :P

 

Create your own profile on imgur and your images aren't going anywhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imgur, as far as I know, is one of the nasties that sheds photos.

 

Why must I resize? I'll have another reason for my 20Mbps upload. :P

I would have full size links available and resized images as embedded. Many of us surf the forums on mobile devices and extremely high quality and high resolution pictures are very slow to load and take up a lot of space.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sure, was only joking. ;)

 

Right so Imgur, or Photobucket?

 

Edit: I like the look of Imgur so giving it a shot. Thanks COZ!

Edited by Azimuth
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...