Jump to content

Verizon and AT&T opposed to splitting AWS-3 auction between paired & unpaired spectrum


bigsnake49

Recommended Posts

Verizon Wireless (NYSE: VZ) and AT&T (NYSE: T) have signaled their opposition to proposals from T-Mobile US (NYSE:TMUS) and Dish Network (NASDAQ: DISH) to effectively split the upcoming auction of AWS-3 spectrum between paired and unpaired airwaves.

 

.........................................................

 

T-Mobile wants the FCC to treat the unpaired 1695-1710 MHz spectrum differently from the paired 1755-1780 MHz and 2155-2180 MHz bands. In an FCC filing, the carrier argued that not only will licensees in these bands "have different technical requirements, but they will also have different obligations with respect to coordination with federal users. The different requirements and configuration of these bands mean that they are not substitutes for each other."

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/verizon-att-oppose-dish-t-mobiles-plans-split-aws-3-auction/2014-07-18

 

Why would T-Mobile be interested in the unpaired spectrum? I don't know that it can be turned into downlink easily. Can it? If it stays as an uplink then the only ones that could be interested would be Dish which would then pair it with their 2180-2200MHz spectrum. The reserve price for the unpaired band is only  $579,775,900. If it's only Dish bidding, then Dish would have gotten some decent spectrum for about $6B. Am I totally understanding this wrong? A.J., Milan, Neil, or anybody else care to enlighten me?

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why Dish network is talking about spectrum when they haven't even begun building a network. This is what piss me off, companies like Dish wants to grab more airwaves when they don't even have a network in place.

 

Then I hear Dish talking about the 600mhz auction which to me they should be blocked from bidding on it. I don't want sprint to cut deals with Uncle Charlie when he was responsible for driving up the clearwire price.

Edited by SprintNYC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why Dish network is talking about spectrum when they haven't even begun building a network. This is what piss me off, companies like Dish wants to grab more airwaves when they don't even have a network in place.

 

Then I hear Dish talking about the 600mhz auction which to me they should be blocked from bidding on it. I don't want sprint to cut deals with Uncle Charlie when he was responsible for driving up the clearwire price.

Emotion has no place in business. Sprint can only look at the bottom line. If the bottom line makes sense then they should do it. When egos get involved, bad decisions are made.  Dish made a play for Clearwire not to drive the price for Sprint but because they wanted Clearwire's spectrum on the cheap. That the way DishErgen operates. 

 

If hosting Dish's spectrum makes the approval of the merger easier, then Sprint should do it. If swapping some spectrum with Dish makes financial and strategic sense, then they should do it. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What do you mean?

 

S4GRU frowns upon 1-liners.

 

S4GRU also frowns upon eye liners, flat liners, and sewage filled cruise liners.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What can Dish Network do with AWS-3? What exactly are their plans? They need to stop hoarding spectrum. Sprint is only sitting on their sliver of 900Mhz.

They want the 1695-1710MHz uplink to pair with their 2180-2200MHz downlink. As part of bidding for PCS block H they got a waiver from the FCC to use the 2000-2020MHz uplink, that was formerly paired with 2180-2200MHz, as a downlink. PCS H + 2000-2020 will give them a 25x5 allocation adjacent to Sprint's PCS G block. I bet that 25x5 block is pretty interesting to Sprint. I can foresee a lot of potential horsetrading between Sprint and Dish when it comes to spectrum and/or hosting that spectrum. I don't think that Dish is interested in becoming a 5th carrier. I think they want to use Sprint's EBS for VOD and TV Everywhere as well as fixed broadband they can then sell to their own customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...