Jump to content

Verizon and AT&T opposed to splitting AWS-3 auction between paired & unpaired spectrum


bigsnake49

Recommended Posts

Verizon Wireless (NYSE: VZ) and AT&T (NYSE: T) have signaled their opposition to proposals from T-Mobile US (NYSE:TMUS) and Dish Network (NASDAQ: DISH) to effectively split the upcoming auction of AWS-3 spectrum between paired and unpaired airwaves.

 

.........................................................

 

T-Mobile wants the FCC to treat the unpaired 1695-1710 MHz spectrum differently from the paired 1755-1780 MHz and 2155-2180 MHz bands. In an FCC filing, the carrier argued that not only will licensees in these bands "have different technical requirements, but they will also have different obligations with respect to coordination with federal users. The different requirements and configuration of these bands mean that they are not substitutes for each other."

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/verizon-att-oppose-dish-t-mobiles-plans-split-aws-3-auction/2014-07-18

 

Why would T-Mobile be interested in the unpaired spectrum? I don't know that it can be turned into downlink easily. Can it? If it stays as an uplink then the only ones that could be interested would be Dish which would then pair it with their 2180-2200MHz spectrum. The reserve price for the unpaired band is only  $579,775,900. If it's only Dish bidding, then Dish would have gotten some decent spectrum for about $6B. Am I totally understanding this wrong? A.J., Milan, Neil, or anybody else care to enlighten me?

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why Dish network is talking about spectrum when they haven't even begun building a network. This is what piss me off, companies like Dish wants to grab more airwaves when they don't even have a network in place.

 

Then I hear Dish talking about the 600mhz auction which to me they should be blocked from bidding on it. I don't want sprint to cut deals with Uncle Charlie when he was responsible for driving up the clearwire price.

Edited by SprintNYC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why Dish network is talking about spectrum when they haven't even begun building a network. This is what piss me off, companies like Dish wants to grab more airwaves when they don't even have a network in place.

 

Then I hear Dish talking about the 600mhz auction which to me they should be blocked from bidding on it. I don't want sprint to cut deals with Uncle Charlie when he was responsible for driving up the clearwire price.

Emotion has no place in business. Sprint can only look at the bottom line. If the bottom line makes sense then they should do it. When egos get involved, bad decisions are made.  Dish made a play for Clearwire not to drive the price for Sprint but because they wanted Clearwire's spectrum on the cheap. That the way DishErgen operates. 

 

If hosting Dish's spectrum makes the approval of the merger easier, then Sprint should do it. If swapping some spectrum with Dish makes financial and strategic sense, then they should do it. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What do you mean?

 

S4GRU frowns upon 1-liners.

 

S4GRU also frowns upon eye liners, flat liners, and sewage filled cruise liners.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What can Dish Network do with AWS-3? What exactly are their plans? They need to stop hoarding spectrum. Sprint is only sitting on their sliver of 900Mhz.

They want the 1695-1710MHz uplink to pair with their 2180-2200MHz downlink. As part of bidding for PCS block H they got a waiver from the FCC to use the 2000-2020MHz uplink, that was formerly paired with 2180-2200MHz, as a downlink. PCS H + 2000-2020 will give them a 25x5 allocation adjacent to Sprint's PCS G block. I bet that 25x5 block is pretty interesting to Sprint. I can foresee a lot of potential horsetrading between Sprint and Dish when it comes to spectrum and/or hosting that spectrum. I don't think that Dish is interested in becoming a 5th carrier. I think they want to use Sprint's EBS for VOD and TV Everywhere as well as fixed broadband they can then sell to their own customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It’s a neat and seemingly valid / effective strategy that, at least from my understanding, is only really used by VZW
    • Those are usually left over from the initial AWS deployment, so all run B13/B66 with support for BC0/BC1 (although that’s been shut off on most sites). No NR. Sites with the later Ericsson radios got an OTA update and broadcast B2. On those sites, a B5 OTA update was also available (and tested), but ultimately rolled back. Putting up all that power/spectrum severely degraded the B13 output.  The site atop Crystal Mountain is another story and uses the same setup as the site on the ridge near Neilton. These antennas were selected for their vertical beamwidth. Most modern directional antennas have small vertical beamwidths and would require extreme downtilt to cover the road next to a steep ridge. Thus, they would have a severely limited coverage footprint beyond the road. Omnis can be a better choice in these instances, especially when there’s LoS to the coverage objective (since they’ll generally have lower gain figures). Omnis also don’t run in to the horizontal sector edge problem, which can be difficult to optimize for with directional antennas that have complex or irregular 3D gain profiles. That’s why on a lot of sites on mountains, you’ll see wider antennas used. For example, the Verizon site on Joyce Ridge has three sectors with 80-degree HBW antennas. 
    • Do you know what RAN is behind those Omni's? LTE (bands?) are they pushing any NR through them? Very curious   edit: I guess I could check cellmapper etc but you might know more nuance!
    • N41 here has been expanded from 140Mhz to 180Mhz.  Speeds seem the same so they just need to work on backhaul
    • I noticed today that T-mobile has shut of B41 LTE in the Louisville area and widened the 2nd n41 carrier to 80MHz. That just leaves them with 5x5 B12, 10x10 B2, and two 10x10 B66 carriers on LTE, everything else is in NR (besides their 2G network). They have 20x20 n71, 20x20 n25, 5x5 n25, and 180MHz n41. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...