Jump to content

iPhone 5 Facts/Rumors


legion125

Recommended Posts

I would go insane without swipe among the other millions of innovations

Apple Iphone does not have!

Let alone the money invested in apps!

 

Too late to change to another platform!

 

Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would go insane without swipe among the other millions of innovations

Apple Iphone does not have!

Let alone the money invested in apps!

 

Too late to change to another platform!

 

Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2

 

It's not too late. I have over 600 apps for iPhone and I'm using an Android cell phone, lol. And yes, I have bought numerous apps for my Evo Shift, and some were duplicates.

 

And I don't know how anyone could ever get used to swype. Quite annoying to me.

 

Sent from Joshs iPhone 3Gs using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it has a 4 inch display. Their tech stays behind the times so people will purchase the next thing a year later.

 

I'm curious to how many iphone users wish their iphone had a bigger screen. Although they may not admit it, I bet there are quite a few that do. Also, didn't steve jobs say something along the lines of, "The world does not want a bigger screen on their phone." I know he said something like that when the big-screen cell phone craze began. I wonder if he/apple really believed that, or if it was just more of their stubbornness/arrogance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm curious to how many iphone users wish their iphone had a bigger screen. Although they may not admit it, I bet there are quite a few that do. Also, didn't steve jobs say something along the lines of, "The world does not want a bigger screen on their phone." I know he said something like that when the big-screen cell phone craze began. I wonder if he/apple really believed that, or if it was just more of their stubbornness/arrogance.

 

I think it would be fine with most customers to make a bigger screen, as long as it isn't too drastic. If they went to 3.75 or 4 without making too much of an overall size increase, it will be well received. If they went to 4.5+, it would turn some people off, but they wouldn't be that dumb. Apple knows what they've doing.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'd buy the iPhone (whatever #), if it had a larger screen. I'm hoping for at least a 4" screen, same form factor, and same set of aftermarket accessories.

 

One of the guys in my office has one of those battery pack cases which adds about 3/4" on top and bottom of device, and about a full day of battery life on top of the stock battery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd buy the iPhone (whatever #), if it had a larger screen. I'm hoping for at least a 4" screen, same form factor, and same set of aftermarket accessories.

 

One of the guys in my office has one of those battery pack cases which adds about 3/4" on top and bottom of device, and about a full day of battery life on top of the stock battery.

 

I'm not so sure they can stuff good LTE antenna's in the current form factor, although I could be wrong seeing that rumors going both ways have been posted around the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure they can stuff good LTE antenna's in the current form factor, although I could be wrong seeing that rumors going both ways have been posted around the internet.

 

True, and I'll take a larger form factor. My biggest pet peeve with the current design is the wasted space. I want a larger screen, and less plastics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, and I'll take a larger form factor. My biggest pet peeve with the current design is the wasted space. I want a larger screen, and less plastics.

 

While we are on the topic of form factors, check out these concept drawings of a Liquidmetal iPhone.

 

http://macdailynews.com/2012/05/01/check-out-these-ultra-thin-next-gen-liquidmetal-iphone-artists-concept-images/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we are on the topic of form factors, check out these concept drawings of a Liquidmetal iPhone.

 

http://macdailynews....concept-images/

 

Hate to say it, but that, like many other of the iPhone design rumors, is sounding pretty far fetched, imo.

 

Edit: projector beams, and all...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate to say it, but that, like many other of the iPhone design rumors, is sounding pretty far fetched, imo.

 

Probably so, but Apple does have the rights to Liquidmetal at least. I guess we will see for sure what rumors are right and which ones were totally fake when the next iPhone is released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably so, but Apple does have the rights to Liquidmetal at least. I guess we will see for sure what rumors are right and which ones were totally fake when the next iPhone is released.

 

Yea, Apple has the rights to about everything... so they say....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, Apple has the rights to about everything... so they say....

 

Actually, I must correct myself. Apple has a contract with Liquidmetal to license their material, and it's possible that the next iPhone or even the next MacBooks to use the material for their cases. It will be interesting to see what Apple has up their sleeves this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another concept gallery of Liquidmetal iPhone concepts.

http://www.cultofmac...oncept-gallery/

 

This looks really cool.

 

Beautiful looking concept!

 

I just hate how so much space gets wasted. I don't want to make this a "VS" tread, but the leaked images of the GS3 show that Samsung got it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not too fond of the idea of a virtual home button, but I do like this design.

 

 Sent via Forum Runner on my redsn0w iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

 

Virtual buttons are no good for me either, as I have a hard enough time with "pressing" the home button or the search button on my EVO Shift all the time anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just found this on Sprints site this morning. Have they advertised the iPhone 4 this way before?

 

sprint%20screen%20grab%20copy.png

 

This is just weird to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just found this on Sprints site this morning. Have they advertised the iPhone 4 this way before?

 

sprint%20screen%20grab%20copy.png

 

This is just weird to me.

 

Not odd if Apple is going to announce the new iPhone at WWDC, which is just a few weeks away now. However I think it is just a generic marketing blurb, because IMHO Apple will keep the 4 around as the basic "free" handset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not odd if Apple is going to announce the new iPhone at WWDC' date=' which is just a few weeks away now. However I think it is just a generic marketing blurb, because IMHO Apple will keep the 4 around as the basic "free" handset.[/quote']

 

That's what I thought too. But I don't think the next iPhone will be previewed at WWDC. Just iOS 6.

 

Sent from my Joshs EVO Shift using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I thought too. But I don't think the next iPhone will be previewed at WWDC. Just iOS 6.

 

Sent from my Joshs EVO Shift using Forum Runner

 

Yeah, I have a feeling the new iPhone won't be seen/leaked till late August, Sept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...