Jump to content

800 SMR Repeaters


prophead
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't want to start an argument about the negatives\interference issues etc of repeaters....not the point of this question :)

 

What I am curious about is whether or not old iDen repeaters would work with the new Sprint 800 SMR.  Frequency range is the same so therefore they should right?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing not because their software only supports the IDEN protocol and not CDMA.  Also sprint wants to eliminate old towers for good and use fewer NV sites to provide coverage.

Not sure if it has anything to do with protocol, but channel width.  The old configuration was narrow band 25khz channels for iDen but Sprint got the FCC to reband SMR for wide band 1.25Mhz CDMA and 5Mhz LTE channels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it has anything to do with protocol, but channel width.  The old configuration was narrow band 25khz channels for iDen but Sprint got the FCC to reband SMR for wide band 1.25Mhz CDMA and 5Mhz LTE channels.

 Yes but the repeaters could not just repeat a single channel. They would repeat  a whole bunch of them. Now, my qualm would be is it a pre-rebanding repeater or a post-rebanding repeater?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Your talking two different things, broadband RF amplifier which was the final stage of a site before the antennas vs the actual RF generating cards that produced signal for each channel going into a combiner to get amplified as a whole. The only thing out of IDEN worth keeping was the RF amp and antennas. But the goal of NV was to move the RF amps to the tower top, feed them with fiber and reduce the amount of RF power wasted in the transmission line. Hence the rough +5 dB of gain in signal and better coverage from the site. 

 

The next added benefit was tilt controlled motors that allows the coverage radius of sites to be remotely controlled. They did this to become green(er). It's 2:00 am and 80% of the population is asleep. Raise the tilt on those antennas at night to cover more territory and shut some antennas and amplifiers off since capacity is lower. Now you're saving energy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Did some more exploring tonight. Saw n77 on both my USM and Visible SIMs, but never for long enough to take a screenshot, let alone do a speedtest. VZW's coverage maps are *massively* overstated for n77, at least here. Had to go pretty far north to even get those glimpses. Finding T-Mobile n41 was miles easier.
    • Just figured out this is a waste of time. US Mobile and Verizon lock the eSim to the emei while T-Mobile only uses it to see that you have a capable phone, like Red Pocket does with physical sims (although RP does keep track of what phone you are using it on with the emei.)  So @Trip was right in this case on liking physical sims.
    • Verizon has a reputation for being frugal with MVNOs. After looking around, I also decided US Mobile was my best option. People have gotten C band on it.  Hoping for esim for my S21 Ultra.  No luck so far.  Red Pocket does not claim Verizon 5g, although they say Soon!(TM).  I do see some 5g with it. Typically MVNOs are deprioritized, thus I am reluctant to claim truly getting top speeds with one.
    • Did some exploring yesterday/last night and didn't find a shred of C-Band, including with my brand new US Mobile SIM. Did find 4CA CBRS but the site seemed backhaul constrained; both that plus 15x15 B2 and band-locked 2/66 got me 190 Mbps or so.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...