Jump to content

Sprint Will Not Participate in H Block Auction


marioc21

Recommended Posts

Band 12 will become usable the moment channel 51 is cleared. and Channel 51 wil be cleared 1st. So if Sprint can buy both A and B then they could have a very usable spectrum band. Sprint/Softbank needs to start thinking strategically for once.

ATT has a pretty solid stranglehold on the B block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how much they can pack down to in some markets as some already jammed packed like in the northeast due to the density of people.

 

I use OTA daily for TV viewing and hope it doesn't have any negative impact on it. Please, no more VHF stations as DTV should have never allowed those to be used.

 If stations are willing to MOVE from the top of the UHF band down into VHF then that's fine by me. I realize it's not ideal in the northeast since you don't WANT that added range, but those of us living in the boonies appreciate the range of VHF stations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the spectrum map, ATT has the E block in the NY/Boston area and the LA/SF area. I take your meaning though, the vast majority is Echostar.

 

Qualcomm had the Lower 700 MHz E block for added MediaFLO capacity in New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Boston, and San Francisco.  Those are the E block licenses that were transferred to AT&T.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just say there's very complex alliances being formed behind the scenes for the 600 mhz spectrum auction. 700 A-B (B12) is of no use to anyone now especially since USCC is moving to Band 5 LTE (CLR850) with over 90% of their network refarmed and broadcasting that spectrum. 

USCC still owns a ton of 700Mhz A spectrum. I don't think that they've given up on it, they just decided to move first on their Cell spectrum because it doesn't have any issues with channel 51 and they don't have to deal with the lack of band 12 equipment. Those two issues will soon be solved though. Sprint and ATT have both committed to support band 12 on devices, and channel 51 will have to be cleared before you have even have a 600Mhz auction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 If stations are willing to MOVE from the top of the UHF band down into VHF then that's fine by me. I realize it's not ideal in the northeast since you don't WANT that added range, but those of us living in the boonies appreciate the range of VHF stations.

 

Guess I have the opposite problem in my terrain/area.  VHF stations are PITA to receive correctly, they didn't let them allocate enough power.  Some stations went back and added more power but many did not.  UHF stations just work.  Point the antenna and that's it.  VHF..not so much.   It's the exact reason one station around here was on 8 and temporarily on 29 for DT operations/transition.  They opted to go to 8 for DT.  Tons of customers started complaining in town.  They got a waiver to do 8 and 29 DT for a while and finally opted to go back with 29 since it allowed them to have more power and better signal in town with less interference.  Channel 9 in Baton Rouge wouldn't do a interference agreement with them on 8 to increase more power since WAFB wanted to stay on the "enough" flea power of 5kw.  I've installed many OTA solutions in the area and downright hate dealing with VHF stations.  Those full power 1000kw UHF stations are a breath of fresh air!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are getting ahead of ourselves. Even with Verizon, Tmobile, and Att's 700Mhz A, it would not be anywhere close to nationwide. It would not completely solve the IBEZ problem at either border.

 

Posted Image

No one ever claimed that 700 mhz A was nationwide. Sprint would have to make an effort to buy up or go on an LTE sharing agreement with the regional carriers to fill the gaps

 

Sent from my LG G2 LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATT has a pretty solid stranglehold on the B block.

Correct. The Verizon 700 mhz B block licenses were already sold to ATT in Jan 2013 and the FCC officially approved the transaction in Sept 2013. Therefore the B block is now off the market. ATT now has the majority if not all of the 700 mhz B block licenses.

 

Sent from my LG G2 LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. The Verizon 700 mhz B block licenses were already sold to ATT in Jan 2013 and the FCC officially approved the transaction in Sept 2013. Therefore the B block is now off the market. ATT now has the majority if not all of the 700 mhz B block licenses.

 

Sent from my LG G2 LS980 using Tapatalk

They most certainly don't have all them. In my town the only 700 MHz they own is the D block (which is kind of worthless). But, yes, they certainly have the lion's share of the B block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They most certainly don't have all them. In my town the only 700 MHz they own is the D block (which is kind of worthless). But, yes, they certainly have the lion's share of the B block.

 

Right which is why I said the majority and at least in the major metros.  I can't vouch for small cities but definitely in the majority of the top 100 cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess I have the opposite problem in my terrain/area.  VHF stations are PITA to receive correctly, they didn't let them allocate enough power.  Some stations went back and added more power but many did not.  UHF stations just work.  Point the antenna and that's it.  VHF..not so much.   It's the exact reason one station around here was on 8 and temporarily on 29 for DT operations/transition.  They opted to go to 8 for DT.  Tons of customers started complaining in town.  They got a waiver to do 8 and 29 DT for a while and finally opted to go back with 29 since it allowed them to have more power and better signal in town with less interference.  Channel 9 in Baton Rouge wouldn't do a interference agreement with them on 8 to increase more power since WAFB wanted to stay on the "enough" flea power of 5kw.  I've installed many OTA solutions in the area and downright hate dealing with VHF stations.  Those full power 1000kw UHF stations are a breath of fresh air!

 

Like any other lower frequency spectrum, the advantage of VHF is that it has better range in theory, and the trouble is that it has better range in theory.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like any other lower frequency spectrum, the advantage of VHF is that it has better range in theory, and the trouble is that it has better range in theory.

 

Except that they don't have to worry about it. They are allowed a territory and a power limit. It's not like they afre building a cellular network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except that they don't have to worry about it. They are allowed a territory and a power limit. It's not like they afre building a cellular network.

 

Well they may not have a choice, but it does limit who can recieve their broadcast over the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

So is the PCS H block auction still scheduled for Jan 22?

 

Yes.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • My hope is they can spot something in the data that was exported. I am going after all 4 carriers on a multitude of phones and Android versions. It should be noted I did not reboot after updates and some of the data was captured on the prior update. Data from some new Boost Mobile Dish (Echostar) sites in the Wheeling area did make it in. Was hoping for more SA data from the duo.
    • I was traveling for a couple of days.   Sunday evening, I upload from 3 phones.  A S-22 and two Moto 5G phones.  Everything looked ok.    How do we explain that?   One person has issues and another person does not.  All my phones have the latest update.
    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...