Jump to content

New suggestion: A moderated 'Index' thread


Recommended Posts

I saw something like this done on a gaming site or two before, and it hit me earlier that, if someone ever had the time (and that's kind of the key to the idea, so I certainly don't harbor much on the front end in terms of expectation that it could be implemented here, but it was a thought I felt good enough to propose and see what might happen), it would really be great for members of this site like myself who are more on the green side as it relates to various facets of not just the wireless industry, but especially so as it relates to Sprint and NV.


Now, before I go on, I understand there's already a FAQ thread, but the idea/implementation of this is different. The index thread is more of an outline fashion, and under every topic, you have multiple links to not even so much full threads (and in fact I'd discourage linking full threads for this idea), but specifically chosen *posts* within a given thread by the moderators that give some outstanding detail/information about that topic.  Hence, why it would also need to be a moderated thread which is locked and unable to be posted in by anyone else.


Just to throw out as an example of why I'm suggesting this and how it differs from the basic FAQ: when I first joined here, I had no clue what eHRPD was.  Somewhere on this site in a thread on that topic, Robert has an outstanding post that gives alot of insight on it, and it wasn't until I read that thread, and particularly that post within the thread, that I 'got a clue'.  If there were an index thread I could have referenced that had posts such a this linked under that topic heading, It would have been much easier and more beneficial, in my opinion anyway.


While the initial inspiration and purpose of 'S4GRU' may have been to give information about the progress of NV, it obviously has evolved on the current website to be a harbor for a ton of knowledge and opportunity to share that knowledge with others...but for the average member it's frankly overwhelming to try and take it all in unless you have the time to at the very least do a ton of searching if not reading through entire threads.  Again, I fully understand that it would be a significant task for someone with both the history and at least a fairly firm grasp on the knowledge to compile such things into a thread as I'm suggesting, so I wouldn't be the least put off if the end result is discovering that its just not possible....but I do think its a worthy enough idea to throw out there and see if it sticks all the same.  :tu:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luckily with the like system, it could easily help in putting that specific post up to the top of that thread.  Since the posts that typically describe or define a particular topic in a thread get those significant thumbs up, moderation of the index would be easier.


Hope that makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My god that would be awesome.  It would take some time, but there are a few here that seem to read over every post so I imagine it could be done.  Ultimately, it would cut down on duplicate threads and potentially people asking the same question over and over again.

I think this is a great suggestion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't ask too many questions anymore because I'm pretty sure they've been answered. . I just hope I'll happen upon my answer while sifting through, which usually happens sooner or later (so far). I haven't had much luck finding the answer to the difference in a 4g only and 3g/4g tower...I know it's here tho


Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off topic, and I know you didn't ask but a 4g only tower has not had 1x and EV tested and accepted on the new equipment so those two techs are still running on the legacy.  3g/4g has had 1x, EV, and LTE tested and accepted on the new equipment.


Back on topic.  I think that this proposed thread would be a great idea but also agree that It would take a significant amount of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • The DAS at LGA Terminal B actually has n41 at 100+20, but if you are deprioritized, good luck on the busy days, as all the bands are congested, even B41 and n41, with data being worse than 128kbps international roaming. It has SA active for n41 as well. The L train tunnel is actually 80+20 for n41, with SA n41 active. Speeds aren't anything compared to Philadelphia's DAS system that has n41 though. The gig+ upgrades are expanding, as eNBs 894588 (Sprint convert site) and 55987 can both pass 1 Gbps now. Clocked nearly 1.3Gbps on eNB 55987 today.
    • Hopefully this goes thru!  https://www.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/1211mh7/tmobile_files_another_sta_application_to/
    • Yup 80MHz C-band + 40MHz DoD for a total of 120MHz. They should be pretty well setup post-clearance. — — — — — Famous Verizon site on Atlantic referenced in this reddit post got moved to the top of the building next door. — — — — — Also looks like I mapped a T-Mobile oDAS node eNB 347812 in Brooklyn Heights. Streetview shows it as one of the CC nodes with no antenna on top as of May 2022 but this specific eNB was first mapped this month. I didn't notice that I mapped it until I got home but the range on it is significantly greater than the normal "antenna-less" nodes T-Mobile deploys. I'm wondering if it got upgraded to the new 5G oDAS design but I won't be able to check it out until next weekend.  
    • I didn't know they had access to 80 MHz of c-band that does change some things then once that's online
    • While I've been loath to update my Samsung devices past the May 2022 update to keep the Band Selection tool, I note that it looks like Android 14 is going to add Timing Advance for NR to the API.  (Was looking today as I have another Verizon A42 5G now that I'm going to unlock for T-Mobile, and wanted to figure out if I should let it update or not.)  Since I can technically make band changes from *#73#, on the A42 5Gs, I can probably live without the Band Selection tool if a later Android version adds something useful like TA values. I assume SCP will be updated to support that once it becomes publicly available.  The real question is whether or not the phones will support it.  My S21FE and A42 5G devices do on LTE, but I know the S22 and the A32 5G do not support it even on LTE, providing just zero in that field. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...