Jump to content

Antenna Placement on Tower?


Recommended Posts

So I noticed that work is underway on a 4G tower in Birmngham, AL (finally) and decided to take a drive over to take a look.  I couldn't get close unfortunately since some road work was going on in the area.  The site appears to be a typical Crown Castle site common in this area and it is a monopole that appears to be exclusivly used by Sprint.  I had perhaps falsely assumed that when a tower was upgraded with Network Vision that the old antennas and equipment were removed and replaced by new antennas and equipment.  This site has active legacy antennas at the top of the mast and about a third of the way down has new antennas with wires hanging.  Is this normal?  Would this not reduce the coverage area?  I will try to remember to bring my camera to work and snap a pic if needed tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I noticed that work is underway on a 4G tower in Birmngham, AL (finally) and decided to take a drive over to take a look.  I couldn't get close unfortunately since some road work was going on in the area.  The site appears to be a typical Crown Castle site common in this area and it is a monopole that appears to be exclusivly used by Sprint.  I had perhaps falsely assumed that when a tower was upgraded with Network Vision that the old antennas and equipment were removed and replaced by new antennas and equipment.  This site has active legacy antennas at the top of the mast and about a third of the way down has new antennas with wires hanging.  Is this normal?  Would this not reduce the coverage area?  I will try to remember to bring my camera to work and snap a pic if needed tomorrow.

 

Are you sure there isn't a second carrier on that site?  Almost always, the Network Vision panels and legacy panels are side by side on the same rack.  NV panels and RRU's most often in the center, between the legacy panels on each side.  Legacy service stays active until they are able to decommission the legacy a few weeks/months after NV acceptance.

 

It is very uncommon that Network Vision panels are on a different rack than legacy panels.  Sprint doesn't need to lease two spots on the tower.  Waste of money.  The only exception is if they are taking over the Nextel rack and giving back their previous location back to Crown Castle.  This may happen in a few instances, but is not common.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not positive.  I will try to get a picture in the morning.  It did appear that the Network Vision panels were on there own rack though, perhaps the lower rack previously housed Nextel antennas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure there isn't a second carrier on that site?  Almost always, the Network Vision panels and legacy panels are side by side on the same rack.  NV panels and RRU's most often in the center, between the legacy panels on each side.  Legacy service stays active until they are able to decommission the legacy a few weeks/months after NV acceptance.

 

It is very uncommon that Network Vision panels are on a different rack than legacy panels.  Sprint doesn't need to lease two spots on the tower.  Waste of money.  The only exception is if they are taking over the Nextel rack and giving back their previous location back to Crown Castle.  This may happen in a few instances, but is not common.

 

Robert

So if the legacy panels's are off from all three sides then the sight should be 3g accepted for NV right, because I have seen about 6 towers like that but they're not on the sponsor map as 3g accepted since no LTE is there but the one I'm closes to is marked as in progress and the legacy panels have been off for a month or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if the legacy panels's are off from all three sides then the sight should be 3g accepted for NV right, because I have seen about 6 towers like that but they're not on the sponsor map as 3g accepted since no LTE is there but the one I'm closes to is marked as in progress and the legacy panels have been off for a month or more.

 

Yes, if the legacy panels are gone, it would need to be 3G accepted.  Or so you would think.  Tell me which sites via PM, and I can check them out for you.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, if the legacy panels are gone, it would need to be 3G accepted.  Or so you would think.  Tell me which sites via PM, and I can check them out for you.

 

Robert

Message sent, the only question i have is that my tower is so slow now and has been since they started to work on it about 4 moths ago in May. For about three weeks we were in roaming last month and speed test are so horrible, I'm 100 percent positive it's not because to many people are connected to it since it's rural here and all the jobs here are agriculture and most work in the city about 10 miles up with more towers close together plus most people here still have flip phones and other non smart phones. Even sprint reps cant believe the is slow service here when they look at there maps to find my address. Is this normal when a tower is being upgraded??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure there isn't a second carrier on that site?  Almost always, the Network Vision panels and legacy panels are side by side on the same rack.  NV panels and RRU's most often in the center, between the legacy panels on each side.  Legacy service stays active until they are able to decommission the legacy a few weeks/months after NV acceptance.

 

It is very uncommon that Network Vision panels are on a different rack than legacy panels.  Sprint doesn't need to lease to spots on the tower.  Waste of money.  The only exception is if they are taking over the Nextel rack and giving back their previous location to Crown Castle.  This may happen in a few instances, but is not common.

 

Robert

Wouldn't suprise me if they are on two different legacy panels

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uncommon but possible. There is a site in Highland Township, MI (northern Oakland County) that threw me off because it turns out NV was installed on a different rack than legacy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uncommon but possible. There is a site in Highland Township, MI (northern Oakland County) that threw me off because it turns out NV was installed on a different rack than legacy.

There are a couple in south Oakland County, IIRC in the Southfield area, that had legacy antenna gear on racks but NV gear directly mounted to the tower itself.  My pictures of one of those sites are in the "How to spot" thread for Samsung IBEZ hardware.

 

97y1865.jpg

And no, the panels directly above the NV hardware are not Sprint.  Sprint has 6 coaxial cables running from their boxes up the tower and there was a rack above with the same pair of narrow rectangular antenna panels that Sprint uses almost everywhere around me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a couple in south Oakland County, IIRC in the Southfield area, that had legacy antenna gear on racks but NV gear directly mounted to the tower itself.  My pictures of one of those sites are in the "How to spot" thread for Samsung IBEZ hardware.

 

 

And no, the panels directly above the NV hardware are not Sprint.  Sprint has 6 coaxial cables running from their boxes up the tower and there was a rack above with the same pair of narrow rectangular antenna panels that Sprint uses almost everywhere around me.

 

The ones directly above the network vision antenna are Sprint legacy. Can't ever mistake the old Nortel antennas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ones directly above the network vision antenna are Sprint legacy. Can't ever mistake the old Nortel antennas. 

They look like Sprint and Sprint does use those panels, but they arent.  I will grab a complete picture later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a picture, I don't remember the lighter color antenna(s) being on the bottom rack yesterday but they may have been.  If that's the case then I suppose the top rack may not even be Sprint so this would make more sense.

 

9510969007_701339d8ab_c.jpg
P8140177 by uh60james, on Flickr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a picture, I don't remember the lighter color antenna(s) being on the bottom rack yesterday but they may have been.  If that's the case then I suppose the top rack may not even be Sprint so this would make more sense.

 

9510969007_701339d8ab_c.jpg

P8140177 by uh60james, on Flickr

What market is that? So many wires!!

 

yvwkX5E.jpg

A sprint only site.

The bottom/top rack have antennas removed/added since this picture. I took new ones, but it was too dark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alabama, so Ericsson equipment.  Those wires are insane, yesterday they were all just hanging freely when I took a look.  I don't have the antenna ID skills some of you have so I still have no idea if this is Sprint only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a picture, I don't remember the lighter color antenna(s) being on the bottom rack yesterday but they may have been. If that's the case then I suppose the top rack may not even be Sprint so this would make more sense.

 

Posted Image

P8140177 by uh60james, on Flickr

The top rack is definitely Sprint. The bottom is either T-Mobile or AT&T.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alabama, so Ericsson equipment.  Those wires are insane, yesterday they were all just hanging freely when I took a look.  I don't have the antenna ID skills some of you have so I still have no idea if this is Sprint only.

With samsung you hardly see any wires :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...