Jump to content

No Google Play Movies for rooted phones


Duffman

Recommended Posts

Yeah it is total BS if you ask me. I hope this doesn't start a trend of things to come.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Tab 10.1 via tapatalk

 

I hope not either. If Google continues to pull this crap on us, then they need to lose.

 

Not only funny, but I agree whole heartedly. I can watch Netflix on my rooted device. This is BS. I hope WebOS free source takes off.

 

Posted via Forum Runner

 

I hope WebOS takes off too. It's just too bad it has it's roots in Palm, which died a horrible death in the tech sector.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I hope not either. If Google continues to pull this crap on us, then they need to lose.

 

 

 

I hope WebOS takes off too. It's just too bad it has it's roots in Palm, which died a horrible death in the tech sector.

 

I dunno if they lose if they continue this practice...DIRECTV already does this too to an extent as they have blocked their iPad app from working on jailbroken devices because they added live streaming functionality to it...

 

Does googles rentals save the movie to your device somewhat or is it 100% streamed like netflix? If its the former I kinda understand as they might not want whatever files are saved to be hacked and messed with. If its the later then they have no excuse and should learn from netflix...though wonder if netflix pays a lil more to companies to be able to stream to unlocked devices and Google doesn't want to pay that extra fee bc they know their service can't compete with netflixs so not worth it...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I dunno if they lose if they continue this practice...DIRECTV already does this too to an extent as they have blocked their iPad app from working on jailbroken devices because they added live streaming functionality to it...

 

Does googles rentals save the movie to your device somewhat or is it 100% streamed like netflix? If its the former I kinda understand as they might not want whatever files are saved to be hacked and messed with. If its the later then they have no excuse and should learn from netflix...though wonder if netflix pays a lil more to companies to be able to stream to unlocked devices and Google doesn't want to pay that extra fee bc they know their service can't compete with netflixs so not worth it...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

 

You have the option to stream the video or download it for offline viewing.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Tab 10.1 via tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao

Props to Mcdroidburger for posting that picture!

 

It seems Google is being very hypocritical !

 

Id still support google over the half eaten rotten fruit!

 

Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why it either does not detect your root or does not care on the Nexus.

 

Duff, maybe it has to do with the difference between modified stock ROM's versus AOSP ROM's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duff, maybe it has to do with the difference between modified stock ROM's versus AOSP ROM's.

 

Root is root. When a program is set to not function on a rooted phone, that is all it looks for. The program will usually look for /system/bin/su. There is a program out there that is supposed to rename that temporarily and then put it back the way it was after you do whatever you were going to do.

 

There is a slight chance that a ROM could be written that wouldn't need the superuser app to be in the /system/bin/su directory and still have root access, but I haven't heard of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And of course I have my phone rooted lol. from the day after I bought it.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

 

take it you don't have superuser installed??

 

the thread here:

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=23728906&highlight=watch+google+movies+with+root#post23728906

 

seems to briefly discuss it there and one other says they can also use it just like you...So it seems it might either be just effecting custom Rom's OR its looking for Superuser binaries after its installed and given programs access??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what the deal is. I have superuser inslalled.

a6fa6016-2388-d522.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

 

Okay then, but your not on a custom ROM though just stock but rooted?

If that's the case it might be something in custom ROMs that breaks it?....

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...