Jump to content

Is network vision really that good?


Recommended Posts

Hello i live in DC and we are in the process of getting network vision implemented. And i have some questions:

 

1. Is network vision really that good?(faster speeds, more coverage etc..)

 

2.Is indoor coverage better?

 

3.Stronger signal strength?

 

4.Internet speeds faster?

 

5.3G really that much better?

 

In general is it really that much of a difference?

 

Thank you and sorry for the bad english not my first language.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello i live in DC and we are in the process of getting network vision implemented. And i have some questions:

 

1. Is network vision really that good?(faster speeds, more coverage etc..)

 

2.Is indoor coverage better?

 

3.Stronger signal strength?

 

4.Internet speeds faster?

 

5.3G really that much better?

 

In general is it really that much of a difference?

 

Thank you and sorry for the bad english not my first language.

 

1) Yes.

 

2) Yes

 

3) Yes

 

4) Yes

 

5) Yes

 

--- Yes

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd move up from an F to a D- anytime. :-)

 

That was my philosophy in college!

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello i live in DC and we are in the process of getting network vision implemented. And i have some questions:

 

1. Is network vision really that good?(faster speeds, more coverage etc..)

 

2.Is indoor coverage better?

 

3.Stronger signal strength?

 

4.Internet speeds faster?

 

5.3G really that much better?

 

In general is it really that much of a difference?

 

Thank you and sorry for the bad english not my first language.

 

1) yes, and it will only get better as time goes on.

 

2) there are marginal improvements with the initial NV build, but once 800mhz is deployed, there will be noticeable improvements.

 

3) you'll see stronger signal, but it goes hand in hand with your #2 question.

 

4) yes, I can do a 3G signal speed test now at an NV site and average 2Mbps down and 0.9Mmbps up. On average I see 10+Mbps down and 3Mbps up on LTE.

 

F5s7DdO.png

 

5) see #4

 

 

 

 

Sent from my Sprint iPad using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...