Jump to content

Conversation about Sprint Moving to UMTS


Recommended Posts

 

Canada is more or less a mirror of the US in spectrum policy. Add the protectionism of their government and good old-fashioned greed, throw them together, and voila, Robelus. I know one of the entrants there, Moblicity, went into creditor protection (Candadian C11) and sold off to Telus. WIND isn't doing great either.

 

 

Canada has crazy-strict foreign ownership rules, right?

 

I bet there's lots of foreigners who'd love to buy WND, Moblicity, and Public and make some nice dough in the worlds highest-priced market.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2009/08/11/canada-cellphone-rates-expensive-oecd.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. If the only other option for the high end engineers is C7 liquidation, I'm betting even the French would accept a deal when it comes to AlLu finding a buyer.

 

2. Canada had the foreign investment rules which lifted a bit, but it's still a lot of scrutiny to put up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, it would be a good move to give it business, if it wasn't already so close to folding. It was in better shape when Sprint negotiated the agreement for Network Vision, but that is no longer the case. As for the feature set, Alcatel-Lucent DBSes lag behind Ericsson and Samsung in terms of 3GPP features supported in Release 9 (not even counting Release 10, since only one of the three vendors actually has a substantial amount of Release 10 features implemented).

 

 

If ALU is good enough for Verizon's small cells, it should be good enough for Sprint

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-taps-alcatel-lucent-ericsson-lte-small-cells/2013-05-21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If ALU is good enough for Verizon's small cells, it should be good enough for Sprint

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-taps-alcatel-lucent-ericsson-lte-small-cells/2013-05-21

What isn't mentioned is that Verizon's choice of vendors was pre-selected back when they began the LTE deployment three years ago. They were quietly talking about it at Mobile World Congress, as well. Last year was when Verizon became a loud proponent of small cells, and noted that it worked with Ericsson and ALU since mid-2011 on the HetNet stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the same, I think the rumors of Alcatel-Lucent's demise are a bit exaggerated or at least premature.

 

I feel it's premature because ALU was the first to produce small cells for Sprint PCS CDMA/EVDO/LTE.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with AlLu isn't engineering wise. It's that they lose money hand over fist. Same problem Lucent had. NSN was able to turn around in a short time by bringing focus to their business and focusing on mobile broadband.

 

Maybe AlLu should try the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Someone told me a couple years ago, that there were problems getting certain modems to aggregate overlapping spectrum even if the overlapping parts were actually blanked. So I think there might be firmware issues that need to be resolved first, which T-Mobile might not consider worth the effort for 4MHz at this time.
    • Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
    • No? RCS on Google messages works great for me, messages between anyone with RCS enabled go through with no problems. Don't remember the last time I had an issue. I only have issues with people on iPhones on different carriers from T-Mobile.
    • Has anyone experienced a ridiculous amount of difficulty with Google messages with RCS enabled?  It has been a train wreck for me for the past year so I now use WhatsApp.  That works very well for all of us.... Android and iOS.  
    • Probably not worth the fiddling given that that's a few percent of the band. Also, if they really wanted to push my assumption is there are still guard bands in play for the n41 carriers so they could fit two "100 MHz" carriers into 194 MHz anyway. Looks like minimum guard band is less than 1 MHz and a 100 MHz channel is only 273 30 KHz resource blocks, which is a bit over 80 MHz total, so if they really wanted to pull another 5% or so capacity out they could.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...