Jump to content

AT&T May Try Billing App Makers


Duffman
 Share

Recommended Posts

This makes absolutely no sense to me as they already have usage based pricing.

 

From http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204653604577249080966030276.html

 

Subscribe for the rest.

 

BARCELONA—AT&T Inc. said it is considering a way to let the providers of mobile services pay for the cost of the data traffic associated with things like streaming movies and smartphone applications, opening up a new round of debate over the rules of the mobile Internet.

 

John Donovan, the executive responsible for AT&T's network and technology, explained the carrier's interest in the service in an interview, likening it to toll-free calling for the mobile-broadband world.

 

"A feature that we're hoping to have out sometime next year is the equivalent of 800 numbers that would say, if you take this app, ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its actualy a good plan if it works. Since app makers would get data wholesale it would be cheeper.

 

So instead of paying $8 for netflix. Youd pay like an extra dollar or so a month but your off the hook for the data. It could work if it was reasonable enough.

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its actualy a good plan if it works. Since app makers would get data wholesale it would be cheeper.

 

So instead of paying 8 for netflix. Youd pay like an extra dollar or so a month but your off the hook for the data. It could work if it was reasonable enough.

 

Wait. So the app data would not count against your plan with AT&T?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait. So the app data would not count against your plan with AT&T?

 

According to what I read, no it wouldn't count against regular monthly data allotments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should be unncecessary. Unlimited is alive and well in every country other than our own and the poor canadians. att must have had focus groups work to find new ways to add revenue with no investment and inventing a problem where there wasn't one was their answer.

 

By acknowledging that these companies need to sell data by the byte you have fallen for their scam. Never ever accept tiered data as if it were necessary. Fight against it!

Edited by lynyrd65
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This should be unncecessary. Unlimited is alive and well in every country other than our own and the poor canadians. att must have had focus groups work to find new ways to add revenue with no investment and inventing a problem where there wasn't one was their answer.

 

By acknowledging that these companies need to sell data by the byte you have fallen for their scam. Never ever accept tiered data as if it were necessary. Fight against it!

 

Actually, there is 1 Canadian carrier with Unlimited Data. Wind Communications. They are a 2009 upstart, and they really have big potential if they would just hurry up and expand their network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't trust anything AT&T does. Always an ulterior motive it seems.

 

Posted via Forum Runner

 

I just read something I thought was pretty funny and thought it would fit in well here...

 

A comment from a SprintFeed user:

 

I don't have WiMax and I got my Photon 4G Cash $$$$. I'm waiting of Sprint to get Samsung Note. I would bounce to AT&T, but they nickle-&-dime you to death!!! $79.99 for 1400 minutes, $20.00 for unlimited text, $30.00 for data, $20.00 7:00PM nights, $20.00 cause Im African-American, $20.00 cause I have forgien car, $29.95 cause my girl is fat, $19.95 cause I love Cleveland Browns!!! (You get my point!)
-Davidksims

 

http://www.sprintfeed.com/2012/02/is-dumping-your-wimax-phone-for-lte-really-beneficial/

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I just read something I thought was pretty funny and thought it would fit in well here...

 

A comment from a SprintFeed user:

 

-Davidksims

 

http://www.sprintfeed.com/2012/02/is-dumping-your-wimax-phone-for-lte-really-beneficial/

lmao

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Crunching the numbers a bit more, covering the full MSA would result in slightly under 80% population coverage. But they'd have to deploy on essentially every micro/macro cell in the area.   Yeah, I'm not gonna pretend like I know how either negotiations with squatters or Auction 108 will pan out. That said, I can't see 3.45GHz being *that* valuable to squatters considering the strict buildout requirements.  Another interesting thought I had was a possible spectrum trade with Dish. Dish is still leasing 600MHz to T-Mobile in quite a few metro areas, and I'm sure T-Mobile is looking ahead to what their lowband spectrum situation will be once those leases expire. If T-Mobile is truly going to rely on n71+n41 CA as much as they say they will, it sure would be nice to be working with more than 5MHz-10MHz of n71 uplink capacity. Don't go quoting me on that, though, total (pipedream) speculation haha.
    • Great job on your analysis of small cells versus the 3.45GHZ and the population coverage requirements. I wonder if the fcc is stalling because they may address the key limitation of of 2.5: the convoluted frequencies. Not sure how they would get there, but it would be better public policy if you could actually use a single license in current times, ie 5, 10 or 20MHz. Of course they could also go in more of a nonprofit or small business direction. But most likely they will keep it as planned given how messy the transition would be. In many/most metro areas BRS/EBS is fully licensed. Would be nice if they put pressure on the squatters.
    • I didn't actually look at the buildout requirements before making that comment - they're definitely going to have to deploy on macro sites if they want to hit the buildout requirements. PEA001 has a population of 25,237,061, of which they will have to hit 45% in 4 years (11,356,677) and 80% in 8 years (20,189,649). If they were to cover the entirely, all five boroughs, of NYC using only small cells (something I'd say is impossible considering their current small cell density), they'd only be covering 32% of the population in the PEA. And this is with spectrum that only adds 300Mb/s per sector and will likely have only 50% the range of their current n41 equipment. Doesn't really seem worth it to me. I'm of the opinion that they're looking to hedge their bets in further EBS/BRS acquisition. 
    • These strand mounts also are deployed with Band 46 (LAA), in my experience. I have yet to encounter a strand mount with exclusively 2/66. 
    • Bought a esim "sim" card a few weeks ago that operates in all of my more current phones according to its app. It arrived a couple of weeks early from Berlin.  Now if my MVNOs would get moving and support more than iPhones and rarely Pixels so I can test this thing. https://esim.me The only item really troubling so far is reviews in google play store keep getting deleted, even 5 star ones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...