Jump to content

Sprint CEO Dan Hesse says that Sprint may raise prices when LTE footprint gets competitive


Recommended Posts

Yeah I would bet we would see alot more variety in full retail prices too, instead of the typical standard suggested retail price. There would be phones retailing every price segment from 200 to 1000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind those "$800 devices" sold for $200 are really more like $300 devices propped up to be "$800 devices." But the carriers and especially the device manufacturers are laughing all the way to the bank with the current contract-subsidy model. If it were to go away, then devices would be sold at retail with much smaller profit margins.

 

AJ

Oh yes. The devices would be cheaper overall, but would tend to scare away consumers (in my opinion).

 

One of my favorite moments goes like this:

Sprint gets the Galaxy Nexus. MSRP is $549.99.

Sprint and Asurion raise TEP prices on all new phones with MSRP $549.99 and up to $11/month from $8, insurance claim deductible to $150 from $100.

I ask one of my supervisors, "How come the Galaxy Nexus is $549.99 on Sprint, along with raised insurance prices... yet I can go to the Play Store and buy an Unlocked GSM one for $399.99 right now? Surely making it CDMA doesn't cost $150."

She replied, "That... is... a very interesting question. I'll have to ask the Asurion reps and get back to you."

She never got back to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have liked to have seen Sprint offer SDC for free as well for people with unlimited plans. I was going to try out the new Android app, but saw that it is $5 a month. I wonder how much it costs them monthly to run that service. I think more people might stay if that wasn't an extra $5 per device per month.

 

Also doesn't seem compatible with my phone for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes. The devices would be cheaper overall' date=' but would tend to scare away consumers (in my opinion).

 

One of my favorite moments goes like this:

Sprint gets the Galaxy Nexus. MSRP is 549.99.

Sprint and Asurion raise TEP prices on all new phones with MSRP 549.99 and up to 11/month from 8, insurance claim deductible to 150 from 100.

I ask one of my supervisors, "How come the Galaxy Nexus is 549.99 on Sprint, along with raised insurance prices... yet I can go to the Play Store and buy an Unlocked GSM one for 399.99 right now? Surely making it CDMA doesn't cost 150."

She replied, "That... is... a very interesting question. I'll have to ask the Asurion reps and get back to you."

She never got back to me.[/quote']

 

Sprint has the 32gb model and the unlocked GSM one is 16GB...

 

Sprint is a third party seller, whereas Google is selling the unlocked ones direct (and charging shipping)

 

Sprint is LTE, unlocked is HSPA+ only

 

Just a few reasons it might be more expensive. Or maybe they are just being jerks...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck.. where I live I probably won't have LTE till the end of 2013. Seriously considering porting my number to Straight Talk with the Next Nexus that is released. I refuse to go to Verizon or ATT (which both have LTE here now). At least I'd have HSPA+. Really rooting for Sprint but getting tired of these abysmal data speeds. My Galaxy S3 is a beast of a phone but absolutely crippled by sprints network right now.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a SERO user with two lines, I'm not sure if SERO makes money or not but I assume it's not a loss either. The SERO thing is interesting though because I have always believed that there isn't enough of those customers to move the needle one way or another and likely not concentrated in a single area to affect network usage. If Sprint has 40M customers how many are SERO less than 1 percent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My non-SERO family plan with 25% discount for 2 phones was around $170... $54 per month is a huge difference when it comes to profit margins.

 

How does your plan come to that amount?

On a two line family plan, Everything Data Share 1500, with the 25% discount (off part of the first line), it is $122.49 before fees, taxes, pretend taxes.

The difference is $22.49, not huge. To be honest, T-Mobile will take up the Sprint drop offs if they raise their prices.

I have the SEROP-500 plans, not anything higher, most of my minutes are considered mobile to mobile, even though I know I call home/businesses, strange how they calculate minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does your plan come to that amount?

On a two line family plan, Everything Data Share 1500, with the 25% discount (off part of the first line), it is $122.49 before fees, taxes, pretend taxes.

The difference is $22.49, not huge. To be honest, T-Mobile will take up the Sprint drop offs if they raise their prices.

I have the SEROP-500 plans, not anything higher, most of my minutes are considered mobile to mobile, even though I know I call home/businesses, strange how they calculate minutes.

 

I don't know what the plan breakdown was, I cancelled back in February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i kind of figured they would.. i mean, how else would they make up for the million (if not bilions) of dollars they are pouring into the LTE network upgrades..

 

 

i wouldn't mind paying say 10 bucks more a month if we were allowed hotspot usage (say 5gb a month).. seriously, it's 2012 and data should be dirt cheap.. if i were CEO i'd include 2GB of free data hotspot on everything plans and $10 extra for 5-6GB of data. i would probably do something crazy like $1/GB. i can only imagine what an advangte sprint would have over the other carriers if they steped up the game weren't so greedy like the other carriers when it comes to data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wouldn't mind paying say 10 bucks more a month if we were allowed hotspot usage (say 5gb a month).. seriously, it's 2012 and data should be dirt cheap.. if i were CEO i'd include 2GB of free data hotspot on everything plans and $10 extra for 5-6GB of data. i would probably do something crazy like $1/GB. i can only imagine what an advangte sprint would have over the other carriers if they steped up the game weren't so greedy like the other carriers when it comes to data.

Well, considering Sprint's current data overage charges are around $50/GB, I'd say that would be a vast improvement. You really don't want to go over on a hotspot on Sprint.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...