Jump to content

Will the 2013 LTE build out require devices not yet available?


jeffcarp
 Share

Recommended Posts

I live in Des Moines Iowa so it will be quite a while before we have LTE here. I do travel to some areas that have LTE so I could use it periodically if my phone supported it.

 

I am currently running the Cyanogenmod 9 beta on my galaxy s2. It is probably the best Android experience I have had yet on any phone so I am very reluctant to upgrade before I need to. However, I am eligible for an upgrade from Sprint now.

 

One option is that I could update now, enjoy a little bit of LTE in some markets when I travel and be in a position for my next update in the fall of 2014 after the network is completely ruled out.

 

The other option is to keep this current phone, enjoy cyanogenMod 9 and 10 and wait to update until Des Moines gets LTE in late 2013 (hopefully).

 

My question is, I have read something in these forums about Sprint using different frequencies for LTE once they get rid of all of the Nextel stuff. Does this mean that in order to take advantage of the entire Sprint LTE capability of the completely built out network, that the user would need to have a phone with radios that do not exist today in the current LTE phones?

 

If that is the case, then I would really be inclined to hold on my update and stick with my Galaxy S2 solution running CyanogenMod and wait until those phones came out (next year?).

 

If that is not the case I may be leaning towards updating now, enjoying LTE where I can and then be in a position for a new update in 2014 after the rollout is complete. Then again, the Galaxy S2 runs so well with CyanogenMod even if this is not true about the radios, just the natural evolution of how much better phones will be in a year makes me inclined to wait until Des Moines is live as well.

 

Obviously I'm confused and talking myself into and out of each option. What would you do?

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in Des Moines Iowa so it will be quite a while before we have LTE here. I do travel to some areas that have LTE so I could use it periodically if my phone supported it.

 

I am currently running the Cyanogenmod 9 beta on my galaxy s2. It is probably the best Android experience I have had yet on any phone so I am very reluctant to upgrade before I need to. However' date=' I am eligible for an upgrade from Sprint now.

 

One option is that I could update now, enjoy a little bit of LTE in some markets when I travel and be in a position for my next update in the fall of 2014 after the network is completely ruled out.

 

The other option is to keep this current phone, enjoy cyanogenMod 9 and 10 and wait to update until Des Moines gets LTE in late 2013 (hopefully).

 

My question is, I have read something in these forums about Sprint using different frequencies for LTE once they get rid of all of the Nextel stuff. Does this mean that in order to take advantage of the entire Sprint LTE capability of the completely built out network, that the user would need to have a phone with radios that do not exist today in the current LTE phones?

 

If that is the case, then I would really be inclined to hold on my update and stick with my Galaxy S2 solution running CyanogenMod and wait until those phones came out (next year?).

 

If that is not the case I may be leaning towards updating now, enjoying LTE where I can and then be in a position for a new update in 2014 after the rollout is complete. Then again, the Galaxy S2 runs so well with CyanogenMod even if this is not true about the radios, just the natural evolution of how much better phones will be in a year makes me inclined to wait until Des Moines is live as well.

 

Obviously I'm confused and talking myself into and out of each option. What would you do?

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2[/quote']

 

You are correct. Sprint is deploying LTE now in 1900MHz and will additionally add LTE in 800MHz starting in late 2013. Currently no devices support LTE 800. They are not expected until Q2/Q3 of 2013.

 

There is a third option also. You could get a Sprint LTE hotspot the next time you go out of town and keep that with you. They are pretty inexpensive.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will LTE 800 be deployed nationwide or is it isolated to certain markets?

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will LTE 800 be deployed nationwide or is it isolated to certain markets?

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

The exact extents of LTE 800 is not completely known yet. But a few things we do know:

  • They will be deploying one 5MHz wide FD-LTE carrier in most markets. In some markets they may be limited to a 3MHz wide LTE deployment (especially the Southeast U.S.)
  • There are licensing issues within 75 miles of the Canadian and Mexican borders that the FCC and Sprint are working through with neighboring countries/license holders that could delay deployment and possibly size of channels used in these areas.
  • They are not deploying in LTE 800 in Puerto Rico initially
  • Sprint is targeting that 80% of sites will receive LTE 800 within each market
  • Sprint will be starting FIT (Field Implementation Testing) for LTE 800 this Fall
  • Sprint is tentatively scheduled to begin LTE 800 deployment in the 2nd Half of 2013

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi, i'm also from the des moines area :) i just upgraded to the EVO 4G LTE from the original EVO and this phone is awesome! i wouldn't let what the network will be when its done hinder you from getting what you want now. if you upgrade now you will be due for another one in 20 months which will probably be just when sprint is getting done with LTE 800 and then it will be ready for you and your upgrade. however, there are 3 4G wimax protection sites in the des moines area, depending on where you live you might pickup a signal from them you can be using in the meantime, also if you travel to any 4G wimax markets you will be be able to take advantage of 4G there as well. so really you can't go wrong either way :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The exact extents of LTE 800 is not completely known yet. But a few things we do know:

  • They will be deploying one 5MHz wide FD-LTE carrier in most markets. In some markets they may be limited to a 3MHz wide LTE deployment (especially the Southeast U.S.)
  • There are licensing issues within 75 miles of the Canadian and Mexican borders that the FCC and Sprint are working through with neighboring countries/license holders that could delay deployment and possibly size of channels used in these areas.
  • They are not deploying in LTE 800 in Puerto Rico initially
  • Sprint is targeting that 80% of sites will receive LTE 800 within each market
  • Sprint will be starting FIT (Field Implementation Testing) for LTE 800 this Fall
  • Sprint is tentatively scheduled to begin LTE 800 deployment in the 2nd Half of 2013

Robert

 

No LTE 800 in Puerto Rico initially. From the information you have, is there a schedule for deployment of LTE 800 in Puerto Rico? 2014 or beyond? Its good to know taking into account phone upgrade terms and phone availability with LTE 800 capabilities beyond 2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No LTE 800 in Puerto Rico initially. From the information you have' date=' is there a schedule for deployment of LTE 800 in Puerto Rico? 2014 or beyond? Its good to know taking into account phone upgrade terms and phone availability with LTE 800 capabilities beyond 2013.[/quote']

 

I do not know about the long term prospects for LTE 800 in Puerto Rico at this time. I assume the problems stem from either rebanding or negotiations with neighboring countries due to interference.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I do not know about the long term prospects for LTE 800 in Puerto Rico at this time. I assume the problems stem from either rebanding or negotiations with neighboring countries due to interference.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

 

Hopefully it will not be forgotten by Sprint.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not "forgotten" -- maybe just not possible. Other licensees hold SMR 800 MHz spectrum in Puerto Rico. Sprint simply may not have the spectrum to deploy LTE 800.

 

AJ

 

Interesting that as I was bored watching the Bears currently shutting out the hapless lions, I just so happened to be skimming this: http://www.800ta.org...PR_06.30.12.pdf If I'm reading page 30 of this document correctly (always a big "if"), are not the licensees of SMR spectrum being relocated in Puerto Rico to clear contiguous spectrum ~817-824MHz for Sprint just as they are in the mainland?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not "forgotten" -- maybe just not possible. Other licensees hold SMR 800 MHz spectrum in Puerto Rico. Sprint simply may not have the spectrum to deploy LTE 800.

 

AJ

 

That's well explained, thanks.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

any word on where or when now?

 

It was supposed to be in Montana and the New Orleans market. But I have not heard or seen one peep about it since early last Summer.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was supposed to be in Montana and the New Orleans market. But I have not heard or seen one peep about it since early last Summer.

 

Robert

figured as much...

 

off topic : im looking for a cheap iphone 4s or iphone 5 for my blind brother, know of anywhere cheap or someone selling one cheap?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • That's actually really useful information when trying to locate/map these. On CellMapper, if I look for B46 it cuts through a lot of th noise.
    • Crunching the numbers a bit more, covering the full MSA would result in slightly under 80% population coverage. But they'd have to deploy on essentially every micro/macro cell in the area.   Yeah, I'm not gonna pretend like I know how either negotiations with squatters or Auction 108 will pan out. That said, I can't see 3.45GHz being *that* valuable to squatters considering the strict buildout requirements.  Another interesting thought I had was a possible spectrum trade with Dish. Dish is still leasing 600MHz to T-Mobile in quite a few metro areas, and I'm sure T-Mobile is looking ahead to what their lowband spectrum situation will be once those leases expire. If T-Mobile is truly going to rely on n71+n41 CA as much as they say they will, it sure would be nice to be working with more than 5MHz-10MHz of n71 uplink capacity. Don't go quoting me on that, though, total (pipedream) speculation haha.
    • Great job on your analysis of small cells versus the 3.45GHZ and the population coverage requirements. I wonder if the fcc is stalling because they may address the key limitation of of 2.5: the convoluted frequencies. Not sure how they would get there, but it would be better public policy if you could actually use a single license in current times, ie 5, 10 or 20MHz. Of course they could also go in more of a nonprofit or small business direction. But most likely they will keep it as planned given how messy the transition would be. In many/most metro areas BRS/EBS is fully licensed. Would be nice if they put pressure on the squatters.
    • I didn't actually look at the buildout requirements before making that comment - they're definitely going to have to deploy on macro sites if they want to hit the buildout requirements. PEA001 has a population of 25,237,061, of which they will have to hit 45% in 4 years (11,356,677) and 80% in 8 years (20,189,649). If they were to cover the entirely, all five boroughs, of NYC using only small cells (something I'd say is impossible considering their current small cell density), they'd only be covering 32% of the population in the PEA. And this is with spectrum that only adds 300Mb/s per sector and will likely have only 50% the range of their current n41 equipment. Doesn't really seem worth it to me. I'm of the opinion that they're looking to hedge their bets in further EBS/BRS acquisition. 
    • These strand mounts also are deployed with Band 46 (LAA), in my experience. I have yet to encounter a strand mount with exclusively 2/66. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...