Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Lower Central Valley Market (Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia)


aelenes

Recommended Posts

GMR's not the worst thing in the world, at least B25 and B26 are still a possibility. GMOs on the other hand, limited B25 (most don't have it) and no B26.

Except that now, they can't do b41 without re-engineering all of the sites. It's been a while since I checked, but I've never seen a gmr b41 setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So it seems like sprint has started doing CA on other bands not just 41, saw it on 25 today

Engineering screenshot or other evidence?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ill take a signalcheck pro screenshot when it comes back on, this was the first time I saw it

Signalcheck does not show carrier aggregation. It shows what carriers you're connected to and frequencies.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if it's B25² on SCp then it's good news as most of central valley is only 20 MHz PCS A allocation.

 

This means that they've refarmed 10 MHz of it and slimmed it down to 3 CDMA carriers in exchange for a brand new 5 MHz FDD B25 carrier!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if it's B25² on SCp then it's good news as most of central valley is only 20 MHz PCS A allocation.

 

This means that they've refarmed 10 MHz of it and slimmed it down to 3 CDMA carriers in exchange for a brand new 5 MHz FDD B25 carrier!

I have seen B25² at LAX using Singnal Check Pro when I looked into it was saying that it was also B26 I did not have enough time to screen shot it becasue it lasted for 15 sec plus I was driving so when I go back to LAX & I see it again I will screen shot it for everyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Single check pro found another B41-3 

 

GCI:09745907,PCI:37, TAC:19201

 

Mind you this is on my G3

 

Speed test was 30.20 down while upload was 13.53 

 

the second one says 

 

B41-3 

 

GCI:09746806 PCI: 78, TAC:19201

 

Speed test for this one was download 34.13 upload 14.71

 

still not seeing anything like those 90 being posted from Sprint CEO on Twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Single check pro found another B41-3 

 

GCI:09745907,PCI:37, TAC:19201

 

Mind you this is on my G3

 

Speed test was 30.20 down while upload was 13.53 

 

the second one says 

 

B41-3 

 

GCI:09746806 PCI: 78, TAC:19201

 

Speed test for this one was download 34.13 upload 14.71

 

still not seeing anything like those 90 being posted from Sprint CEO on Twitter

 

LG G3 doesn't support carrier aggregation, so it'll connect to one 20MHz carrier - ideally the fastest one available. So the max it can do is around 80 Mbps, but that would be really rare. Would require tower to not be used. So ideally, if you were using a phone that supports 3xCA, you'd be getting around 100 Mbps, depending on the bandwidth load of the other two 20MHz carriers.

 

LG G4 can do 20+20 carrier aggregation and LG G5 can do 20+20+20 carrier aggregation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG G3 doesn't support carrier aggregation, so it'll connect to one 20MHz carrier - ideally the fastest one available. So the max it can do is around 80 Mbps, but that would be really rare. Would require tower to not be used. So ideally, if you were using a phone that supports 3xCA, you'd be getting around 100 Mbps, depending on the bandwidth load of the other two 20MHz carriers.

 

LG G4 can do 20+20 carrier aggregation and LG G5 can do 20+20+20 carrier aggregation.

G5 is only capable of 2 carrier aggregation 20+20.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it is hardware incapable.

 

The announcement is wrong.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is lying to us. :twitch:

 

Shame, such a nice device. What about the mentioned HTC 9 and 10?

I'm not sure why they listed the A9 at all since it has a sd617 chip which is straight out incapable of 3xCA.

 

HTC 10 is legit.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why they listed the A9 at all since it has a sd617 chip which is straight out incapable of 3xCA.

 

HTC 10 is legit.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

How can we trust Sprints network team when they dont even know which phones are 3xca?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the marketing team that does Press releases.

Yes but doesn't the network team tell the marketing team? I guess there is alot of confusion at Sprint right now. Even customer service seems to lack anything other than info that we can look up for ourselves.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but doesn't the network team tell the marketing team? I guess there is alot of confusion at Sprint right now. Even customer service seems to lack anything other than info that we can look up for ourselves.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

It has the Snapdragon, which as far as I know is the same processor as the S7. So doesn't it have the X12 LTE Modem? Pretty certain all those do.... maybe wrong. Here is a quote from a press release, also a article about the modem which I believe is in the G5. Take a look, I think if it does have it and it isn't on that will come with software update,

 

Press Release from Qualcomm: I put a ------><------- in the part mentioning 3x.

"This is the first publicly announced processor for use in mobile devices to support LTE Category 12 in the downlink and Category 13 in the uplink, providing up to 33 percent and 200 percent improvement over its predecessor's download and upload speeds, respectively. Also available as a discrete chipset, the X12 LTE modem has demonstrated peak download speeds of up to 600 Mbps -----> through 3x downlink carrier aggregation <-------and 256-QAM, as well as peak upload speeds of up to 150 Mbps through 2x uplink carrier aggregation and 64-QAM"

 

Android Central Article:

http://www.androidcentral.com/snapdragon-820-come-new-x12-lte-modem

 

LG G5 Modem: From Gizmotimes.com

Can you detail about the processor that powers the LG G5?

 

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor is the flagship SoC from Qualcomm for 2016, and this is what powers the phone that LG has just announced. It is an octa-core chipset clocking at 2.7 GHz, and it is a 64-bit processor. It also has Adreno 530 graphics and lower-power Qualcomm®HexagonTM DSP as well as Qualcomm Spectra™ 14-bit dual image signal processors (ISPs) designed to deliver high-resolution DSLR-quality images and additional power savings.-----------> The Snapdragon 820 processor also has an integrated X12 LTE modem that supports Category 12 download speeds of up to 600 Mbps and LTE Category 13 uplink speeds of up to 150 Mbps.<--------------

 

Link to article: http://www.gizmotimes.com/faq/lg-g5-faq/8308

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from mTalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has the Snapdragon, which as far as I know is the same processor as the S7. So doesn't it have the X12 LTE Modem? Pretty certain all those do.... maybe wrong. Here is a quote from a press release, also a article about the modem which I believe is in the G5. Take a look, I think if it does have it and it isn't on that will come with software update,

 

Sent from mTalk

The modem may be a category 12 capable one but you need to pair it with the capable transceivers.

 

It is FCC tested and specified specifically to support category 6 which is carrier aggregation of two carriers. This is repeated on every single LG g5 models SAR documentation and testing that was submitted to and certified by the FCC.

 

P6Wb9Wo.png

I will be extremely surprised and wrong if it did have the capability. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is up to something in Hanford. Past half year it was common to have 1Mbps speed tests (even the SpeedSmart app reported that the average local download speed within 10 miles in past 14 days was 1.X Mbps). This afternoon at 5pm I did a speed test at Home Depot and got the following. Even more impressive, that was on 5x5 band 25. Even during school hours (I live in an area covered by the same sector as the high school) I rarely/ever? go below 3 Mbps anymore.

 

eNKztUM.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is up to something in Hanford. Past half year it was common to have 1Mbps speed tests (even the SpeedSmart app reported that the average local download speed within 10 miles in past 14 days was 1.X Mbps). This afternoon at 5pm I did a speed test at Home Depot and got the following. Even more impressive, that was on 5x5 band 25. Even during school hours (I live in an area covered by the same sector as the high school) I rarely/ever? go below 3 Mbps anymore.

 

eNKztUM.png

They have been adding a 2nd b25 carrier in every market here other than UCV. That should help out capacity.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...