Jump to content

Large phones, i.e. 5.5" and greater, more or less susceptible to dropping or losing?


kamiller42

Recommended Posts

I asked this on a social media site. Didn't get much feedback. 

 

Here's the reason for my question.

 

My wife tends to either lose her phone or drop it. More the former than later. So, rather getting a right sized phone, I was thinking of getting her a Samsung Mega, something so large it would be harder to misplace or leave behind somewhere.

 

So, are people less likely to drop or lose a large because its size grabs the user attention more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now the question is phones 5.5'' or greater more susceptible to being stolen?   :P

Did you see that video of the live streamer streaming the rioting @ Ferguson? He had his phone stolen out of his hand during a live stream that 80K people were watching.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larger the screen, the more likely it will break too when dropped. Glass does not like to flex. The larger the pane of glass, the more flex that will occur during a crash. If thickness is increased, it could help. But OEMs are making screens thinner and thinner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shape of the device makes a huge difference. I find the iPhone 6+ to be ridiculously slippery and more likely to be dropped, while the Note 4 gives you better edges to hold on to.

 

Sent from my Sprint LG G3

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd get here the Kyocera Vibe...water proof to 3 ft and drop proof...I dropped this phone from about

3 1/2 ft at a Starbucks one day to a hard tiled floor..no problema...but it's a small phone..but a good

one..I have a Note4 now because I wanted the S-Pen but it DEFINITELY will be easier to drop and

YES I'm more aware of it when I'm handling it BUT people tend to get preoccupied and WHAMO there

goes $700

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd get here the Kyocera Vibe...water proof to 3 ft and drop proof...I dropped this phone from about

3 1/2 ft at a Starbucks one day to a hard tiled floor..no problema...but it's a small phone..but a good

one..I have a Note4 now because I wanted the S-Pen but it DEFINITELY will be easier to drop and

YES I'm more aware of it when I'm handling it BUT people tend to get preoccupied and WHAMO there

goes $700

 

Thank you for the suggest. It's nicely priced. I played with the phone at a Sprint store. Seems pretty smooth for an inexpensive phone. They made some ugly UI choices. Not sure why they just didn't stick closer to AOSP. But, the phone seems functional. Wonder why reviews hit it to hard. Are the expecting flagship performance from a low end phone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they expecting flagship performance from a low end phone?

Yup...probably...phone exhibits great battery life and has excellent audio/sound

reproductions...even has wi-fi calling capabilities after the kit-kat update..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

A good case and a glass screen protector go a long way for any phone.

 

The person also determines a lot. I haven't cracked a screen since college (8 years) but cracked 7 screens in 4 years (while in college). I got noticeably more careful when I got $$ conscious.

And some people will break or damage anything you give them, eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The person also determines a lot. I haven't cracked a screen since college (8 years) but cracked 7 screens in 4 years (while in college). I got noticeably more careful when I got $$ conscious.

 

How can you tell that someone is in college?  He/she is carrying around a cracked screen iPhone.  It is both funny and sad.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...