Jump to content

Sprint to expand to Montana using shut down CellularOne sites


Recommended Posts

With a merger a multitude of options would become possible. They would also become necessary as roaming agreements would not likely be extended.

Endless possibilities if they merge. I wonder if T-Mobile would use band 26 in Montana, as well as other remote areas. Would they have to get licenses for it ? I mean they have band 12 and rolling that out rather quickly

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sprint Montana License update

 

On 2/22/17 a technical document labeled "link budget supplement"  was added: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp;ATTACHMENTS=BCv8YzWThLhK1zgQjh11wWFTcrQSr3XQjLmCVXTQT0SPG2qgCBnG!-55596135!-1680248972?applType=search&fileKey=304721726&attachmentKey=20094125&attachmentInd=applAttach

 

The next day the status was returned to "Offlined for Expired License Review".  I checked another area where we have confirmed the LTE to be usable this past summer and have GCIs etc.  It was given the same treatment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint Montana License update

 

On 2/22/17 a technical document labeled "link budget supplement" was added: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp;ATTACHMENTS=BCv8YzWThLhK1zgQjh11wWFTcrQSr3XQjLmCVXTQT0SPG2qgCBnG!-55596135!-1680248972?applType=search&fileKey=304721726&attachmentKey=20094125&attachmentInd=applAttach

 

The next day the status was returned to "Offlined for Expired License Review". I checked another area where we have confirmed the LTE to be usable this past summer and have GCIs etc. It was given the same treatment.

 

I'm sure they're done in Montana work wise.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was traveling through Montana this weekend, and received LTE service in Billings & Missoula. I didn't get screenshots as I was driving. The service was solid however. I'm using an iPhone 7 Plus.

Good to hear. What exactly do you mean by solid though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was able to use my phone while eating breakfast in Missoula with no issues. Check IG, Facebook, etc. I have to say the 3G roaming in WY and MT is reasonable as well, definitely usable until we hit the roaming cap on all our devices.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was able to use my phone while eating breakfast in Missoula with no issues. Check IG, Facebook, etc. I have to say the 3G roaming in WY and MT is reasonable as well, definitely usable until we hit the roaming cap on all our devices.

 

A couple of things...did you have service from billings all the way to Missoula ? Or just service in both locations with roaming in between while driving ? 2nd how extensive was the coverage in both areas ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was only service in those cities, roaming everywhere else. I didn't spend a lot of time in either place as we were just passing through, but it seemed to be fairly consistent while passing through. I would say those two cities are probably covered decently well. Since my wife has relatives up there, I'll hope they expand this eventually.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Spent some time recently in Billings MT.   There are spots of Sprint LTE and native 3G.   It all depends how close you are to the tower.  Feels like a few protection sites but not full-build.    i.e. Many places my phone showed Sprint native (LTE and 3G) where I could not place a call, send or receive a text or use data.  Roaming data in Billings preferred Nemont, which worked fine. 

 

For my travel in and around Billings, I was pleased to see my phone roaming because it meant it was at least working.  I am pleased to see the native service and hopeful it will improve over time.

 

-Dan

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Speaking of a Sprint/T-Mo merger....

 

Recently spoke w/ T-Mo about coverage in Montana - they offer roaming that looks native, but rep said that they are "working on selling service in MT very soon" - haven't kept up on network buzz since that whole mess with Alltel/VZW/AT&T divested markets and then MTPCS tanking, but perhaps Sprint & T-Mo are plotting something...would make a lot of sense in the MT market where T-Mo has basic roaming w/ AT&T but wants native coverage. Dunno if they can even get licenses for the area....thoughts?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Coming back to this topic, and I know this is a two and a half month old comment I'm quoting:

 

T-Mobile is now selling service in one town, planning on more. All stores in Missoula so far are third-party stores, but it means they're committed, on some level. Wouldn't be surprised to see MetroPCS show up soon-ish either. The fact that they now have licences covering most of the state means they're definitely committed to expanding to the rest of the state. Could've been Sprint making the push, but guess they've been well past beaten to the punch now. 

 

In Missoula, they've still got just the one protection site. Still running pretty slow compared to elsewhere, but I can use data. Fun fact: download speeds are roughly equivalent to AT&T LTE here now. I set up a data-only AT&T GoPhone SIM for someone who will be visiting and needs internet around the whole state and did some testing with it, and got 2-3Mbps download speeds. This is on a plan with limited data, so it shouldn't have the throttle like the unlimited GoPhone plan does.

 

But that aside, that's how Sprint is looking. 

 

(I know, it's been ages since I posted anything. I thought of this again when I had a Japanese exchange student ask me to help set up his phone with local service. When I saw he was using SoftBank as his home provider and he was using an iPhone I told him he could just use his plan from home here at no extra cost and set up a TextNow or Google Voice number for people who need a US number to reach him at. I am now having second thoughts about that).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No changed in license status since February 2017 addition of Link Budget Supplement attachments. :clock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's to hoping they merge with T-Mobile....that's the only way we'll see any kind of expansion and T-Mobile is committed to it and brand would probably survive.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's to hoping they merge with T-Mobile....that's the only way we'll see any kind of expansion and T-Mobile is committed to it and brand would probably survive.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

They've been adding towers here and there in high roaming areas (http://www.codyenterprise.com/article_804e6cec-35b9-11e7-8392-3b77677fda5d.html for example)...

 

...and they have over 200 active site leases in Montana...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've been adding towers here and there in high roaming areas (http://www.codyenterprise.com/article_804e6cec-35b9-11e7-8392-3b77677fda5d.html for example)...

 

...and they have over 200 active site leases in Montana...

We don't know when or if they'll ever go commercially live. It's pretty spotty at best in a few cities in Montana. Not enough for them to update their coverage maps.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know when or if they'll ever go commercially live. It's pretty spotty at best in a few cities in Montana. Not enough for them to update their coverage maps.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

One tower per city. I unfortunately can't speak on what is to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully SoftBank merges Sprint with T-Mobile is all I can say

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Doubt a deal happens. But if it does, there will be a lot of headaches as both networks are combined into one. Then there's the issue of which network they'll shut down. CDMA or GSM?

 

Shut down GSM and you'll lose reliable fallback for VoLTE. Shut down CDMA, and you'll lose 1x800 which is more reliable than lowband VoLTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt a deal happens. But if it does, there will be a lot of headaches as both networks are combined into one. Then there's the issue of which network they'll shut down. CDMA or GSM?

 

Shut down GSM and you'll lose reliable fallback for VoLTE. Shut down CDMA, and you'll lose 1x800 which is more reliable than lowband VoLTE.

 

Plausible arguments. It's more probable then doubtful. Let the speculation begin

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt a deal happens. But if it does, there will be a lot of headaches as both networks are combined into one. Then there's the issue of which network they'll shut down. CDMA or GSM?

 

Shut down GSM and you'll lose reliable fallback for VoLTE. Shut down CDMA, and you'll lose 1x800 which is more reliable than lowband VoLTE.

The best/smartest choice, in my opinion, would be to shut CDMA down completely except 1x800.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt a deal happens. But if it does, there will be a lot of headaches as both networks are combined into one. Then there's the issue of which network they'll shut down. CDMA or GSM?

 

Shut down GSM and you'll lose reliable fallback for VoLTE. Shut down CDMA, and you'll lose 1x800 which is more reliable than lowband VoLTE.

 

It doesn't matter given both CDMA and GSM are going to be gone within the next 5 years or so, maybe sooner.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:ot:  Actually I would love to comment on this, but this needs to be in another thread.  Save this for Sprint in Montana.   With any merger, the companies involved need to operate in their usual fashion. 

 

Sprint paid good money for its options in Montana.  They seem to have more money now.  Perhaps their plans will be revisited.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...