Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Inland Northwest


userkv8031

Recommended Posts

To answer, though.  "Tri-Cites" refers to KPR; Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland.  Three cities at the confluence of the Snake and Columbia rivers. 

 

 

Back to your original question (now that I know where you're talking about :P )

 

I would imagine that like other Samsung markets, they are waiting for the majority of sites to be installed, at which point they will start cluster launches of NV 3G, and LTE if it's ready. 

 

The only way we can really know how much progress has been made (before we get acceptances) is for members to do some foot work and see which sites have been upgraded so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here's what I've done while waiting for Sprint LTE coverage in the Tri-Cities on my Motorola Photon Q slider:

  1. Buy a couple of prepaid WiFi hotspots from Wal-Mart (T-Mobile and the Verizon $100 prepaid Novatel MiFi).  The T-Mobile device comes with a 5GB "starter" plan; for $15 to Verizon you get 250MB for up to a week, or $60 gets you 3GB for up to a month.
  2. Drive around Tri-Cities testing throughput using Sensorly (Facebook album), confirming that Verizon coverage wins hands down over both T-Mobile 4G and Sprint 3G.
  3. Discover that Talkatone works great for Google Voice phone calls and SMS texts on my iPad through either the T-Mobile and Verizon hotspots.
  4. Ask my wife and parents for a used Verizon Droid 4 as my birthday present.
  5. Move the SIM from the Novatel MiFi hotspot to the Verizon-locked Droid 4. The Droid 4 registers itself with Verizon just fine for data sessions but can't do phone calls or SMS texts (sort of as expected), nor will it act as a hotspot.
  6. Install CyanogenMod 10.1 for Droid 4.  With this ROM the Droid 4 happily acts as a hot spot using the MiFi SIM.
  7. Install Talkatone on the Droid 4. Using the data service it sends and receives both calls and SMS.

Bottom line -- for a couple of hundred dollars in equipment ($100 for the prepaid Novatel MiFi plus about $100 for the used Droid 4 off eBay) and $60/month in prepaid Verizon service I have full 4G LTE service in the Tri-Cities.  If I use up 3 Gigabytes of data service before the end of the month I simply prepay early for the following month.

 

If/when Sprint gets LTE service working here in Tri-Cities (assuming performance and coverage is acceptable) I can simply stop prepaying the monthly $60 to Verizon; no early termination fee or arguing with a Verizon sales droid about why I want to cancel my service.  Either way I end up with a second perfectly functional WiFi smartphone for home while my "away phone" is charging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to your original question (now that I know where you're talking about :P )

 

I would imagine that like other Samsung markets, they are waiting for the majority of sites to be installed, at which point they will start cluster launches of NV 3G, and LTE if it's ready. 

 

The only way we can really know how much progress has been made (before we get acceptances) is for members to do some foot work and see which sites have been upgraded so far. 

Newbie here; so once I learned we're in a Samsung market, I checked out towers in Richland at Battelle Drive/Stevens, Welsian Way, and near Columbia Center Drive/SR 240.  They all had the Samsung equipment mounted.  And there was a crew working last/this week putting equipment on top of the M Hotel on GW Way.  They said it should all be lit up soon but didn't have any specifics.  For what it's worth, a clerk in the Kennewick store mentioned they thought it would be turned on by the first of the year.

 

The M Hotel site appeared to have NV improvements starting in about August.  I was getting speedtest.net results as high as 2.8 to 3.2MB - is that even possible with 3G?  Most of the results were consistently about 2.5.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The M Hotel site appeared to have NV improvements starting in about August.  I was getting speedtest.net results as high as 2.8 to 3.2MB - is that even possible with 3G?  Most of the results were consistently about 2.5.

The tower up by Battelle only gets me about 1.5 megabits/second at most. Seems to me that tower is still using an old-style T1 back haul circuit, which could explain why they haven't yet turned on 4G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Getting LTE right now in Kennewick!

 

The tower up by Battelle only gets me about 1.5 megabits/second at most. Seems to me that tower is still using an old-style T1 back haul circuit, which could explain why they haven't yet turned on 4G.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. Very exciting.  I hooked the tower on Canal and 395 from way over at Burden/68 in Pasco at a stoplight.  Speed test was 1.5 down/8.5 up.  Then I switched to the Richland Way tower and went back to 3G for .02 down/ .08 up.  This cannot come fast enough.  I could send data by pigeon faster than that.

 

Don't know if anyone else has noticed... Tri-Cities is dead last for any type of tower completions, let alone LTE.  All of the remaining towers in the entire Inland Northwest remain here (except one on I-90 by George); three in Pasco are untouched (I've visited, they will be my main towers at home), Three in Richland unaccepted, and Seven left in Kennewick (although the LTE hit today means at least one is going live) and a couple on the outskirts.

 

I was giggling like a little kid when that phone lit up "4G LTE", though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is great news. My sister is on Virgin Mobile and got a message from them preparing her for the network instabilities as it switches over soon. I haven't seen my Ting phone connect to the tower yet. This will be so great for me, as I'm a mobile IT guy in the Tri-Cities. I got spoiled by a Virgin Mobile WIMAX phone before switching to this Galaxy Nexus on Ting. The 3G gives me enough connectivity to run credit cards, but I so desperately want LTE.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got back into town this morning. Confirmed LTE over by Costco and the Columbia Center Mall, plus downtown Richland.

 

Download speeds with Sensorly started out at about 8 megabits/second but stabilized right at 5. I wonder whether Sprint has implemented per-flow queuing tricks to throttle us would-be bandwidth hogs? :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at my SignalCheck Pro and it reported I was connected to 800mhz from the Railroad tower north of Pasco.  This is where I get hopeful.  The 1900 LTE signals have been horribly spotty in their recent roll-out here.  I know 800 doesn't mean 800 LTE (and I'll need something besides my s3 to get 800 LTE anyway), but it's the first step.  800 LTE, for me, is where I will be happy.  This 1900 is slower than all the other providers, and 800 LTE should at least be everywhere and stable if I have to settle for slower than everyone else.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So the Inland Northwest is 100% complete with NV upgrades right? So why are my data speeds still horrible? Im lucky to pull .18 Mbps down with 4 bars and signal strength at -87dBm. Im in Walla Walla, could it be a backhaul issue? Or is the 100% complete incorrect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Inland Northwest is 100% complete with NV upgrades right? So why are my data speeds still horrible? Im lucky to pull .18 Mbps down with 4 bars and signal strength at -87dBm. Im in Walla Walla, could it be a backhaul issue? Or is the 100% complete incorrect?

 

Network Vision equipment upgrades are 100% complete.  If a site does not have LTE live, then it is still awaiting backhaul.  3G will not improve until the new backhaul arrives.  Then both the 3G and LTE will be fired up at the same time.  This will happen one site at a time as new backhaul arrives.

 

In the town so nice, they named it twice...I believe CenturyLink is the backhaul vendor.  Hopefully they will get fired soon and someone else can quickly complete the work.  CL has been an utter failure for Sprint.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Network Vision equipment upgrades are 100% complete. If a site does not have LTE live, then it is still awaiting backhaul. 3G will not improve until the new backhaul arrives. Then both the 3G and LTE will be fired up at the same time. This will happen one site at a time as new backhaul arrives.

 

In the town so nice, they named it twice...I believe CenturyLink is the backhaul vendor. Hopefully they will get fired soon and someone else can quickly complete the work. CL has been an utter failure for Sprint.

 

Robert

Awesome! Thanks for the info! So once the backhaul is in place, LTE should be active as well right?

 

Another question. If we have a wimax protection site, is it likely that we will get 2500 LTE sooner rather than later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome! Thanks for the info! So once the backhaul is in place, LTE should be active as well right?

 

Another question. If we have a wimax protection site, is it likely that we will get 2500 LTE sooner rather than later?

Yes, LTE and better 3G will likely arrive about the same time. WiMax Protection Sites do have to have their Huawei equipment removed per the federal approval of Sprint buying Clearwire. What is not known is if Band 41 LTE will be added at that time or not. We believe so, but it is not confirmed at this time.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, LTE and better 3G will likely arrive about the same time. WiMax Protection Sites do have have their Huawei equipment removed per the federal approval of Sprint buying Clearwire. What is not known is if Band 41 LTE will be added at that time or not. We believe so, but it is not confirmed at this time.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Awesome! Thanks again! Hopefully things get better soon!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Been awhile since there has been any activity here... I haven't noticed many changes in the Tricities.  North Richland (work) and West Richland (Home) still don't have 4G (LTE).  Anyone have any further info on when we might see the upgrades? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are just waiting on backhaul. Towers are all set to go.The speed of the LTE part of the rollout has been hideous, though. Without leaking secrets, I keep a close eye on the progress meters across the country, our local backhaul installation is some of the slowest around. The locations aren't hard, they are urban, the vendor just refuses to go do the work with ant initiative. I am so frustrated. I know what the new network means, but we are just sitting here with patchwork. We have new stuff using legacy backhaul, which isn't any real advantage over the tower upgrades never having been done. We are at six months since the first LTE showed up here (in Tri-Cities, Spokane and even Yakima have fared better)and we've had one or two additional towers to that LTE locally, that is in a redundant area to the prior LTE coverage. Additionally, again without revealing secrets, a tower that services Pasco (and is mapped as such on sprints coverage page) is overly optimistic by light years in lte coverage and rarely connects even from North pasco. There is also a site I drive by every day that sits with a ground mount option for no apparent reason, I don't think it'll get lte and, even though I'm close I rarely connect to it. If you look on sprints tower upgrade map, not S4GRU's, again revealing no secrets, this is a tower that sits in the heart of pasco and should service most of pasco and north Kennewick.

So I think we are stuck for a very long time waiting for backhaul for most of the tricities & waiting for sprint to get around to actually rebuilding the gmo site.

Then again, if 800lte comes along, since I've got my S5 now, I will be golden. That is, of course, if the device ever kicks over to that band... I know 800 voice is here, and even with zero bars locally I still rarely kick over to 800 voice. But when I do, it's like I have a real, honest to goodness, cell provider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is news...

Kennewick Building permit number BLD-2014-01050 (I saved an image of it but couldn't figure out how to attach it here) states that the rooftop facility at 6 W 6th will receive a 2.5 ghz equipment array.  Applied for on 04/14/14 and to be finished by 10/11/2014.

 

Someone who knows may be able to say whether 800mhz LTE usually comes with an 2.5 install...???

 

Also, while looking through permitting, I found some Clearwire sites that are in waaaaay more optimal locations around here.  Can I get some speculation on whether those sites will be transitioned to full build Sprint towers on Clearwire shutdown?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I got some new pics of a site on 16th and 8th street in Lewiston ID. The guy is working on a small round antenna on the left of the tower.  It was not there before and now LTE is enabled.  What is the small antenna on the left?

Thanks,

 

IMG_7199.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got some new pics of a site on 16th and 8th street in Lewiston ID. The guy is working on a small round antenna on the left of the tower. It was not there before and now LTE is enabled. What is the small antenna on the left?

Thanks,

Microwave backhaul

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was in Walla Walla last month.  Even 3G sucked hard and I was constantly kicked down to 1x.  There are some real data issues going on in that area.  Even along HWY12.  On the way to Burbank picked up some LTE and that is when things got better. 

 

Even I84 from Hermiston to Portland offered better services than HWY12 into Walla Walla.  Even picked up LTE on some places on I84. 

 

Connected to 1x800 here and there as well, but not in Walla Walla. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...