Jump to content

Poor 3G but great LTE?


Recommended Posts

I connect to a single site in Owego, NY while at work, it is 3G/B25 LTE accepted.

 

Speeds on 3G are dismal, usually .2-.5Mbps. However, LTE seems completely unused - I regularly get 28Mbps down and 8Mbps up on this site.

 

Obviously, the backhaul is there. Will 3G ever improve on this site? Is this something a service ticket could fix, or can 3G be completely overloaded by other users despite having adequate backhaul?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I connect to a single site in Owego, NY while at work, it is 3G/B25 LTE accepted.

 

Speeds on 3G are dismal, usually .2-.5Mbps. However, LTE seems completely unused - I regularly get 28Mbps down and 8Mbps up on this site.

 

Obviously, the backhaul is there. Will 3G ever improve on this site? Is this something a service ticket could fix, or can 3G be completely overloaded by other users despite having adequate backhaul?

3g should definitely improve in time, because less and less devices will need to be on it. With b41, b26 and b25...there really won't be a need for 3g eventually except for a fall back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I connect to a single site in Owego, NY while at work, it is 3G/B25 LTE accepted.

 

Speeds on 3G are dismal, usually .2-.5Mbps. However, LTE seems completely unused - I regularly get 28Mbps down and 8Mbps up on this site.

 

Obviously, the backhaul is there. Will 3G ever improve on this site? Is this something a service ticket could fix, or can 3G be completely overloaded by other users despite having adequate backhaul?

 

Is your phone being dropped to 3G when it can't receive LTE or are you forcing it to 3G where you receive LTE? The reason I'm asking is, if your phone is dropping to 3G when the LTE signal drops, the quality of your 3G signal is deteriorating as well, which may be the reason you're seeing poor 3G performance.

 

The other possibility is similar to was jamisonshaw125 is talking about, if your signal is dropping to 3G in a populated area, others are probably dropping to 3G as well, which is crowding the 3G network.

 

There could also be other unknowns.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3g should definitely improve in time, because less and less devices will need to be on it. With b41, b26 and b25...there really won't be a need for 3g eventually except for a fall back.

 

That's what's confusing me. Even if all of the users in Owego have an old single band LTE device, they'd still be on B25 LTE which has totally adequate numbers right now. Is it possible that this town is just full of 3G phones, or everyone is deep indoors and can't grab LTE?

 

Maybe you're right and B26 will alleviate hundreds of the 3G campers indoors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is your phone being dropped to 3G when it can't receive LTE or are you forcing it to 3G where you receive LTE? The reason I'm asking is, if your phone is dropping to 3G when the LTE signal drops, the quality of your 3G signal is deteriorating as well, which may be the reason you're seeing poor 3G performance.

 

The other possibility is similar to was jamisonshaw125 is talking about, if your signal is dropping to 3G in a populated area, others are probably dropping to 3G as well, which is crowding the 3G network.

 

There could also be other unknowns.

I only drop to 3G when it makes sense - i.e. deep in the building or when I'm far away from the site. I usually have good B25 indoor coverage here though, sitting at -100dBm at my desk right now.

 

If I manually force it to 3G outdoors, I get a -46 eHRPD signal! But the speed is still awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only drop to 3G when it makes sense - i.e. deep in the building or when I'm far away from the site. I usually have good B25 indoor coverage here though, sitting at -100dBm at my desk right now.

 

If I manually force it to 3G outdoors, I get a -46 eHRPD signal! But the speed is still awful.

 

Definitely connecting to the same site on both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, I'm out of range of any other sites. I can see the tower from my office.

 

I'm betting there are quite a few users stuck on 3G due to the buildings they're in in the area. Obviously I have no clue about your surrounding buildings, but that would make most sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm betting there are quite a few users stuck on 3G due to the buildings they're in in the area. Obviously I have no clue about your surrounding buildings, but that would make most sense to me.

Gotcha - thanks for the insight. In that case, B26 will be our savior when they get their little white truck here and pop the carrier card in. And I guess I really won't care about 3G performance at that point since I'll barely be on it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you has b25 right? I would love to have b25, or even those 3g speeds in my apartment complex. I can't even stream music at my gym, and the "wifi" doesn't reach it either.  They probably have some archaic POS router.

I haz it. Only in the outskirts of this building though. When I start walking down hallways, or to the cafeteria, it drops and the phone is somewhat unusable at times.

 

I guess I'll consider myself lucky to even have these speeds at the moment - that sounds rough for you!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haz it. Only in the outskirts of this building though. When I start walking down hallways, or to the cafeteria, it drops and the phone is somewhat unusable at times.

 

I guess I'll consider myself lucky to even have these speeds at the moment - that sounds rough for you!

If it wasn't for wifi, I would loose my damn mind. And fortunately I have an iPhone so my messages actually go through. Sometimes my texts don't send, or say they don't send but actually send like 3 times. It's a hard life living on the fringe zone. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps try lte only mode if you keep dropping t 3g?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was in Boston, I intentionally put my phone on 3G and ran a speed test and got speeds of nearly 1.8Mbps. LTE was 8-15Mbps. My guess is that one cities have more LTE device market penetration than others and as a result, 3G will remain poor but LTE will be great.

 

The opposite is the case in NYC. Band 25 is crowded so badly that 3G often has the same speeds or faster than LTE. If it weren't for Band 41 Sprint would look bad here in some neighborhoods. In others LTE and 3G are balanced so perfectly where 3G is over 1.2Mbps with pings of less than 75ms and LTE is 12-15Mbps with pings in the 40's.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

VZW 3G has gotten so bad. It is unusable in many areas anymore. It appears VZW has completely stopped capex on 3G now. If you mention it to any VZW employee they try to hard sell you on a LTE device. When you explain you have one, they look at you like you're from Mars. "Why would you use 3G?" They always ask.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

VZW 3G has gotten so bad. It is unusable in many areas anymore. It appears VZW has completely stopped capex on 3G now. If you mention it to any VZW employee they try to hard sell you on a LTE device. When you explain you have one, they look at you like you're from Mars. "Why would you use 3G?" They always ask.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

In the next few years, teenyboppers will look startled when you say 3g, because they will have no idea what it means.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

VZW 3G has gotten so bad. It is unusable in many areas anymore. It appears VZW has completely stopped capex on 3G now. If you mention it to any VZW employee they try to hard sell you on a LTE device. When you explain you have one, they look at you like you're from Mars. "Why would you use 3G?" They always ask.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Yeah, it is way worse than Sprint's EVDO. But, you never hear anybody really complaining about it. Verizon's EVDO is now about as bad as Legacy Sprint EVDO and in some places completely dead.

 

Post NV, my EVDO speeds/pings are terrific, even though I rarely see it now that I have a G3.

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At my old place of work, it was a few miles down the highway from where I am now. Ground mount NV conversion, 3G accepted, no LTE. I would hit 2.7Mbps all day on 3G and could do everything just fine. YouTube, Netflix, Hulu, you name it. It was probably very underutilized. And I would get these speeds with a -100 eHRPD signal too, pretty far away.

 

The population covered by this site in Owego must be a whole lot more despite having tons more backhaul hooked up, for the 3G to be this bad. Maybe it's everyone on Boost and Virgin mobile clogging it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it is way worse than Sprint's EVDO. But, you never hear anybody really complaining about it. Verizon's EVDO is now about as bad as Legacy Sprint EVDO and in some places completely dead.

 

Post NV, my EVDO speeds/pings are terrific, even though I rarely see it now that I have a G3.

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

 

Wish that was the case in Baton Rouge.  Verizon 3G doesn't hit 2+ anymore, but it's still at a very respectable 1-2 Mbps here.  Sprint EVDO is still abysmal in Baton Rouge, often times resulting in zero throughput on NV accepted sites.  I tried Tmo on the 1 week test run, and their speeds are fantastic when you are on LTE or HSPA, but they need more cell sites in the metro area like Sprint.  They also don't even have a cell site in the immediate downtown area.  So unfortunately, it's either ATT or Verizon here if you want a reliable cell phone experience.  Truly a bummer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It took two years for EVDO to finally start clearing up around here, actually it coincided with the band 26 deployment. I imagine there are just enough tri-band devices connecting to B26 instead of EVDO now to relieve the congestion on EVDO. Now if I wanted to I can turn off LTE and not have my phone become a brick in more crowded places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect that Masa will start pulling 3G capex when LTE coverage becomes ubiquitous.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wish that was the case in Baton Rouge. Verizon 3G doesn't hit 2+ anymore, but it's still at a very respectable 1-2 Mbps here. Sprint EVDO is still abysmal in Baton Rouge, often times resulting in zero throughput on NV accepted sites. I tried Tmo on the 1 week test run, and their speeds are fantastic when you are on LTE or HSPA, but they need more cell sites in the metro area like Sprint. They also don't even have a cell site in the immediate downtown area. So unfortunately, it's either ATT or Verizon here if you want a reliable cell phone experience. Truly a bummer.

Yeah, Baton Rouge is exceptionally terrible for Sprint.

 

Sent from my LG G3 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VZW 3G has gotten so bad. It is unusable in many areas anymore. It appears VZW has completely stopped capex on 3G now. If you mention it to any VZW employee they try to hard sell you on a LTE device. When you explain you have one, they look at you like you're from Mars. "Why would you use 3G?" They always ask.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

I have a Verizon work phone, I used to fall back on its 3g for music streaming and basic browsing when Sprint's 3g was useless. But now Verizon's 3g has basically become useless here.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...