Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - West Texas Market (including Lubbock, Amarillo, Midland/Odessa, San Angelo)


nhanges

Recommended Posts

Ok, two different Sprint tower pics, hope I did this right!

Like I said.. Even though the pics are poor quality those things are unique.

 

Look at my how to spot thread and bet you can make the determination with ease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rode through San Angelo yesterday and had 4G for a bit, though Verizon LTE went out further from town (got ~50/10 at the end of a microwave daisy-chain at the Eden rest stop). Big Spring of course doesn't have anything yet, and as such data speeds are pretty slow there (T-Mobile has H+ and VZ has LTE though). My trip didn't take me west of Big Spring so San Angelo was the only West Texas market where I saw LTE (the next time I picked it up was a bit west of Fort Worth).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One interesting thing that I noticed, not NV/LTE related, was that Sprint still has an extensive roaming agreement with SID 1892 (West Central Wireless fka Five Star Wireless) for 1x. Data pretty much doesn't work on their network (probably because there's a single 1x carrier with no EvDO...WCW has gone the GSM + HSPA+ route), but voice + SMS are fine. I still had a dead zone or two even with roaming, but the dead zones were more pronounced on my Verizon iPad, which didn't roam onto WCW.

 

One point against my suspicion that WCW only has one 1x carrier live at any given location is the appearance of 1x in PCS (channel 925 or something...should have taken a screenshot) in Brady. Or maybe it was Eden. Either way, WCW only has band 0 spectrum in Fredericksburg so it was something different.

 

I couldn't connect to AT&T's network with my data-only-plan Nexus 4 during the trip, but it looked like both they and WCW had consistent service up the corridor San Angelo on GSM + WCDMA (or at least GSM). I would've looked into it further, but my WCW microSIM is probably dead at this point because I only paid for a month of service a few months ago.

 

In any event, that stretch of road is ideal for a NV SMR 1x deployment. LTE would be nice as well, but it wouldn't take too many sites to get the area covered, as long as you use the right (existing) towers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said.. Even though the pics are poor quality those things are unique.

 

Look at my how to spot thread and bet you can make the determination with ease.

Ok so after studying your spot thread and looking at the tower with some binoculars, I can definitely see these RUUs, 2 back to back and one on top! Is this what I'm looking for? Is this the LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so after studying your spot thread and looking at the tower with some binoculars, I can definitely see these RUUs, 2 back to back and one on top! Is this what I'm looking for? Is this the LTE?

Yes there should be at least 3 on each sector of the site. Once fiber is run to the site it will be fired up for LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been on and off four me since Friday in Odessa but I have got as high as 22mbps. I'd say a 7mbps average is about right though. Just went live in far north Odessa today as far as I can tell too. My 22mbps test was near Kermit highway and West County Road. I'm hitting 5mbps+ almost out to Gardendale.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have LTE in downtown Midland and IH-20 and 158 intersection. It extends to about 1 mile south of IH-20. I'm assuming that tower ** is pushing the signal. Speeds are atrocious. I can only get about the same speeds as CDMA, but the signal is all over the place. The best I've gotten is 1.2 mbps down and 47 mbps up, though that was captured right at the last second.

uploadfromtaptalk1376084777376.jpg

uploadfromtaptalk1376084790988.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE is spreading fast in Amarillo!

Goes west on interstate 40 almost to Wildorado and now goes south on interstate 27 into Canyon. I'll be headed to Canyon this weekend and will try to map more extensively on Sensorly within that town while I'm there :)

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, hate to "dig" up an old Thread i can confirm that plainview does not have sprint LTE coverage launched here yet. we have had verizon 4G LTE for about a year and some change now, looking forward to sprint launching LTE here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, hate to "dig" up an old Thread i can confirm that plainview does not have sprint LTE coverage launched here yet. we have had verizon 4G LTE for about a year and some change now, looking forward to sprint launching LTE here.

 

Plainview, TX has two 4G accepted sites the other is complete as well on the 3G side but is waiting on backhaul for 4G.  I don't know how long ago there were done though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE is spreading fast in Amarillo!

Goes west on interstate 40 almost to Wildorado and now goes south on interstate 27 into Canyon. I'll be headed to Canyon this weekend and will try to map more extensively on Sensorly within that town while I'm there :)

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Update: I was able to pick up Sprint LTE all over Canyon. I mapped the major highways and streets on Sensorly :) check it out! It actually went pretty far on my way to Palo Duro Canyon.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plainview, TX has two 4G accepted sites the other is complete as well on the 3G side but is waiting on backhaul for 4G. I don't know how long ago there were done though.

LTE showing up in Plainview today! :)

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, hate to "dig" up an old Thread i can confirm that plainview does not have sprint LTE coverage launched here yet. we have had verizon 4G LTE for about a year and some change now, looking forward to sprint launching LTE here.

 

Finding anything yet? Started to show up on Sensorly today, and we know that there are two sites signed off with LTE in Plainview. Should provide some pretty good initial coverage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...