Duffman

Journey's end.

Wait. So the app data would not count against your plan with AT&T?

http://www.liquipel.com/ Plasma applied nanotechnology waterproofing.

This makes absolutely no sense to me as they already have usage based pricing. From http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204653604577249080966030276.html Subscribe for the rest.

I think I may just hang out here rather than SU. Very friendly and actually informative. I will start posting announcements here if you would like.

I reboot nightly as part of my bedtime routing. My Evo has Fresh ROM on it which I believe actually shows 1X when there is only 1xRTT. I have seen it. I rebooted and ran everything again. MAC still shows 0. Something is amiss.

I agree. QNX is a fantastic OS. Now, can RIM roll out some desirable devices with it? RIM had the corporate and goverment markets but is losing them. I am activating iPhones to replace BBs. It is bizarre because iPhones are not nearly as secure.

I know you meant DEBUG but I wanted to show you that it does appear to be on EVDO Rev A. I ran a speed test while accessing DEBUG on my phone. Strange. Phone shows active 3G but DEBUG shows inactive.

LOL. Yeah, I work for Sprint. I am showing 3G at the top of my phone and it will show 1X if EVDO is not available. Speedtest shows EVDO Rev A. Ran CDMA Field Test...

I turned on Navigation and Dropbox sync to generate some data traffic. I set the Field Test refresh rate to 1 sec. MAC never changed and State stayed at inactive. What's up wit dat?

Analysis? 1X Engineering CH# switched between 475, 625, and 450 SID stayed at 4120 Rx Power -92 to -95 dbm rx Ec/Io -8 to -31 db Rx FER 0.10% EVDO Engineering MAC index 0 Channel Number 650 Band Class 1 Subenet Color Code 88 Active Set Pilot PN 315 Rx Signal Strength 92 Rx Power -89 dbm Channel PER 150, 312, 156, 78, etc

From IntoMobile.com

Welp, the tower that was upgraded near me recently that had 2Mbps.... How can I tell what channel I am on?

I love you, Robert!

Why would Verizon work but Sprint would not. Both are on 1900 MHz, aren't they?

Either OS is going to have to come out with some feature that iOS and Android do not have. It would have to be earthshaking to overcome this:

A post in another forum asked: So why wouldn't Sprint purchase Clear? Liabilities?

http://gigaom.com/broadband/new-freescale-chip-paves-way-for-lte-advanced-cheaper-data/ Freescale Semiconductor has succeeded in cramming an entire cellular base station onto a single chip. It’s a claim many chipmakers have made, but other “base-station-on-a-chip” designs have focused primarily on small cells and femtos. But at Mobile World Congress on Monday, Freescale revealed it has reduced the baseband capacity of a big honking tower-based macrocell to a system-on-a-chip (SoC) design. That’s not only an impressive feat of miniaturization and integration, it could kick off the next-generation of LTE deployments, lower the costs of building mobile networks and reduce the energy required to run them. When all those factors are taken into account, base station SoCs could cut the cost of delivering a bit of data, which ultimately could lead to cheaper mobile data plans for the consumer. The brains of a base station typically reside in a channel card, a sort of hopped up motherboard designed to perform the extremely complex task of encoding and decoding of radio signals. Usually wireless infrastructure vendors like Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent design those channel cards as a bunch of discrete components: digital signal processors, applications processors, and a variety of hardware accelerators. The new QorIQ Qonverge design stamps all of those discrete components onto a single piece of silicon. So why is this significant? SoCs are much cheaper to manufacture than the sum cost of all of those separate components, and also drain far less power. According to Scott Aylor, director and GM of Freescale’s wireless access division, a single QorIQ chip can support the capacity of a three-sector 20 MHz LTE cell site – the same configurations Verizon and AT&T are using in their new 4G networks – for one quarter of the cost. Aylor also said the highly integrated platform also drains three times less power, which will help operators design more energy-efficient networks. If operators can build cheaper networks and cut their operating costs they could theoretically offer mobile broadband at cheaper prices. That performance and power efficiency will make QorIQ a building block for future network technologies such as LTE-Advanced, Aylor said. LTE-Advanced will require enormous processing resources as the bandwidth pumped out by each cell grows well beyond 100 Mbps. “We’re well ahead of the LTE-Advanced curve,” Aylor said. Furthermore, Freescale customers like Alcatel-Lucent and Nokia Siemens Networks are already exploring a radical shift in network design. Known as cloud radio access network, or cloud-RAN, it seeks to divorce the base station from the cell site. Instead, operators could build signal-processing farms in a private cloud, in essence virtualizing their base stations. Whenever capacity is needed, cell sites – which be little more than radio heads at this point – would reach into the cloud and grab it. Again, Aylor said SoCs would be ideal for such a scenario. “We can build farms of 64 of these things on a single card, then daisy-chain them together,” Aylor said. “There’s not a significant limitation on our side as to how far we can scale.” Aylor said the key to developing the SoC was Freescale’s utilizing new 28-nanometer process technology, allowing it to condense a lot more performance in much less space. That means Freescale’s competitors can’t be far behind as most of them are already going down the 28-nm path. Digital signal processing giant Texas Instruments has already developed powerful SoCs for use in Cloud-RAN platforms and is using them to power smaller-sized cells. Aylor, however, said Freescale believes it has significant advantage over its competitors as it can supply a single-chip solution across the board, from the lowliest femtocell to the most powerful macrocell. Not all network vendors subscribe to the SoC approach, Aylor admits, but Fujitsu and Alcatel-Lucent are already converts. The Franco-American networking giant is already using QorIQ chips in its new lightRadio architecture, initially in its Cube small cells, but it plans to begin designing its macro base stations around the new SoCs as well.

Tyler, TX.

When I play with Samsung phones I want them for the gorgeous screen. But it seems they are perpetually plagued by reception issues.

Ah, okay. Glad he is getting compensated so well for the fine work he has done.

Every time I see one of these filings, I figure the people running Sprint don't have much faith in Sprint's future or they would not be selling out when the stock is so low. http://investors.sprint.com/ShowFile.aspx?Output=XML&KeyFile=12767344&Format=XML