Jump to content

newboyx

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,460

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by newboyx

    Samsung Galaxy Note 2

    in Samsung

    Posted

    I'm really liking my Note 2. But it's not for everyone. Sometimes its size is awkward. Like in one handed operation in the car. There is a one handed operation setting, but I haven't tried it yet.

     

    However, there are more times it's size is a plus than a negative. Just pointing out that it's not all roses.

     

    It is quite the conversation piece. When I set it down on the conference table in meetings, people always stare and ask about it. It is a bonafide attention getter.

     

    I was in the Church's Chicken drive thru on Monday, and the cashier at the window sees me checking S4GRU and she shreiks looking down into my car, "Oh my gosh! It is sooo big! Can I hold it?"

     

    Everyone seems to want to know what it is, who carries it, how much, etc., etc. I had the GS3 early, and in comparison no one seemed to care.

     

    Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

    Still waiting on one of Amazon's crazy sales. Isn't it about time for their 1¢ sale?

     

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    • Like 1

    HTC EVO lte connection issues

    in HTC

    Posted

    i reallg hope they fix the issue. i just got my S3 and i havent updated it on my account yet. just rooted it and flashed a ROM. im just not impressed. I truly hate Touchwiz... Sense is miles better than it.

     

    My offer always stands to trade for an HTC EVO LTE, S-Off already, and never been out outside of it's Otterbox that would come with it ;)

    Sounds like a match made in heaven...

     

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    Sprint Deployment vs. AT&T Deployment

    in Network, Network Vision/LTE Deployment

    Posted

    PUBLIC NOTICE

    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

    445 TWELFTH STREET, S.W.

    WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554

    News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov

    DA 12-1737

    Released: October 31, 2012

    AT&T MOBILITY SPECTRUM LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, AND

    BROADBAND WIRELESS UNLIMITED, LLC SEEK FCC CONSENT TO THE

    ASSIGNMENT OF LOWER 700 MHZ BAND B BLOCK LICENSES

    ULS File Nos. 0005373357 and 0005373376

    PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED

    Petitions to Deny Due: November 14, 2012

    Oppositions Due: November 26, 2012

    Replies Due: December 3, 2012

    I. INTRODUCTION

    AT&T Mobility Spectrum LLC (“AT&T Mobility”) and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, both

    indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of AT&T Inc. (collectively, “AT&T”), and Broadband Wireless

    Unlimited, LLC (“Broadband Unlimited,” and collectively, “the Applicants”), have filed applications

    pursuant to Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,1 seeking to assign nine

    Lower 700 MHz Band B Block licenses from Broadband Unlimited to AT&T. The Applicants state that

    the additional spectrum will enable AT&T to increase its system capacity in the areas covered by the

    licenses, particularly for Long Term Evolution (“LTE”) services, and to facilitate the provision of

    additional products and services in nine Cellular Market Areas (“CMAs”) located in Georgia, Illinois,

    Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.

    Preliminary review of the applications indicates that post-transaction, AT&T would hold, in total,

    70 to125 megahertz of spectrum in the CMAs that are the subject of these applications. In addition, in

    CMA 300 (Victoria, Texas), AT&T would hold, post-transaction, 68 megahertz of spectrum below 1

    GHz.

    II. SECTION 310(d) APPLICATIONS

    The applications for consent to the full assignment of the Lower 700 MHz Band B Block licenses

    from Broadband Unlimited to AT&T have been assigned the following file numbers:

     

    1 47 U.S.C. § 310(d).

    2File No. Licensee/Assignor Assignee Lead Call Sign

    0005373357 Broadband Wireless Unlimited, LLC AT&T Mobility Spectrum LLC WQIZ371

    0005373376 Broadband Wireless Unlimited, LLC New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WQIZ379

    III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING

    Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission’s rules,2 the Commission may adopt modified

    or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We

    announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are

    applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission’s rules.3

    Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission’s revised ex parte

    rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation’s

    substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.4 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the

    views and arguments presented is generally required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written

    presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(B) as well.6

    IV. GENERAL INFORMATION

    The assignment applications have been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing.

    The Commission reserves the right to return any application if, upon further examination, it is determined

    to be defective and not in conformance with the Commission’s rules or policies.

    Interested parties must file petitions to deny no later than November 14, 2012. Persons and

    entities that file petitions to deny become parties to the proceeding. They may participate fully in the

    proceeding, including seeking access to any confidential information that may be filed under a protective

    order, seeking reconsideration of decisions, and filing appeals of a final decision to the courts.

    Oppositions to such pleadings must be filed no later than November 26, 2012. Replies to such pleadings

    must be filed no later than December 3, 2012. All filings concerning matters referenced in this Public

    Notice should refer to ULS File Nos. 0005373357 and/or 0005373376 as appropriate.

    To allow the Commission to consider fully all substantive issues regarding the applications in

    as timely and efficient a manner as possible, petitioners and commenters should raise all issues in

    their initial filings. New issues may not be raised in responses or replies.7 A party or interested

    person seeking to raise a new issue after the pleading cycle has closed must show good cause why it

    was not possible for it to have raised the issue previously. Submissions after the pleading cycle has

    closed that seek to raise new issues based on new facts or newly discovered facts should be filed

    within 15 days after such facts are discovered. Absent such a showing of good cause, any issues not

    timely raised may be disregarded by the Commission.

     

    2 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a).

    3 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206.

    4 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(B)(1).

    5 See id.

    6 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(B).

    7 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.45©.

    3Under the Commission’s current procedures for the submission of filings and other documents,8

    submissions in this matter may be filed electronically though the Commission’s Universal Licensing

    System (“ULS”) or by hand delivery to the Commission.

    · If filed by ULS, pleadings may be filed via

    https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/pleadings/pleadingsType.jsp.

    · If filed by paper, the original and four copies of each filing must be filed by hand or messenger

    delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail.

    All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission’s Secretary must be

    delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW, Room TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554.

    The filing hours at this location are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held

    together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the

    building. Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority

    Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal

    Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W.,

    Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission’s Secretary, Office of

    the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.

    One copy of each pleading must be delivered electronically, by e-mail or facsimile, or if delivered

    as paper copy, by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or

    overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (according to the procedures set forth above for paper filings), to:

    (1) the Commission’s duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., at FCC@BCPIWEB.COM or

    (202) 488-5563 (facsimile); (2) Kathy Harris, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,

    at kathy.harris@fcc.gov or (202) 418-7447 (facsimile); (3) Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition

    Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at catherine.matraves@fcc.gov or (202) 418-7447

    (facsimile); and (4) Jim Bird, Office of General Counsel, at TransactionTeam@fcc.gov or (202) 418-1234

    (facsimile).

    Copies of the applications and any subsequently-filed documents in this matter may be obtained

    from Best Copy and Printing, Inc. in person at 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C.

    20554, via telephone at (202) 488-5300, via facsimile at (202) 488-5563, or via email at

    FCC@BCPIWEB.COM. The application and any associated documents are also available for public

    inspection and copying during normal reference room hours at the following Commission office: FCC

    Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The

    applications are also available electronically through ULS, which may be accessed on the Commission’s

    Internet website. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large

    print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and

    Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contact the FCC to

    request reasonable accommodations for filing comments (accessible format documents, sign language

    interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov; phone: (202) 418-0530 or TTY: (202) 418-0432.

    For further information, contact Kathy Harris, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications

    Bureau, at (202) 418-0609, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless

    Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 391-6272.

    -FCC-

     

    8 See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009).

     

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    Google Nexus 4 by LG

    in Google

    Posted

     

    Is the front of the station wagon really missing at the wheel, or is that just an effect of the app on the photo?

     

    Robert

    Ha! It's the app.

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    • Like 1

    HTC EVO lte connection issues

    in HTC

    Posted

     

    Hey, what do you think about the xda member "regalpimpin" that said he has far better success with lte connectivity when running a cm10 rom compared to a sense rom. You already posted in that topic but I will link to it anyway:

     

    http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1959803

     

    I didn't notice a difference between my ROM, stock, and CM10. If anything CM10 lacked access to dialer codes that were useful.

     

     

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    • Like 1

    Jelly Bean for our HTC EVO 4G LTE??

    in HTC

    Posted

    I think the big thing that facilitated the flip flop in updates between the 2 companies is related to who was/is working on a Nexus device at the time. When HTC was rocking out the updates they were just finishing up work on the Nexus One. They had access to the code long before any other OEM. Samsung has worked on the last 2 Nexus phones and we have seen the speed of updates increase because of it. Look how fast Asus got updates to their tablets rolled out. Think working on the Nexus 7 had anything to do with that? Samsung is posting updates to all of the SG3 phones currently. Think having access to the code while working on the Nexus 10 has anything to do with that? Just my theory on the role reversal of the 2 companies regarding OS updates.

     

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    • Like 1

    Samsung Galaxy S III

    in Samsung

    Posted

     

    Never! They're mine! All mine! Ah hah ha ha ha!!!

     

    I gave my brother my GNex. That was tough to part with. I still have separation anxiety over it. So I will never repeat that. Never. ;)

     

    Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

    You could do a S4GRU auction/fundraiser

     

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    • Like 3

    Samsung Galaxy S III

    in Samsung

    Posted

    I just installed Jelly Bean on my GS3. Played with it for 5 minutes and turned it off and went right back to my new Note 2.

     

    Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

    Sounds like someone might have a GS3 for sale soon...

     

     

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    Network Vision/LTE - Indianapolis Market

    in Markets

    Posted

    As someone not currently in an LTE market, I have a question for those in a market being rolled out. I'm aware that in Chicago they became drop call city, in Indy did/have you experienced fluctuation in data coverage/speeds prior to any LTE development?

     

    I'm just curious for any hints I should look for, as an LTE hopeful.

     

    Thanks in advance!

    The issue with dropped calls in Chicago was/is so far a unique case. I have not noticed any issues with the upgrades in Indy.

     

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    • Like 1

    Sensorly - New market deployements

    in Network, Network Vision/LTE Deployment

    Posted

     

    Any device that had the 606xx PRLs will not use the 800SMR. I believe it was the 21xxx PRLS that the EVO 3D and I think one other phone had it (can't remember) did have the 800SMR scans in them but they were set to a lower priority than the PCS scans. I haven't seen a recent copy of that PRL range though as most of the techy people that could pull those PRLs have moved on to other devices.

     

    Even the 55008 PRL the new Photon and iPhone5 runs does not have 800SMR either. That's a puzzling one.

    The master has spoken.

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

     

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...