S4GRU

Open House Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

I can confirm that I have roamed all over non coverage (white) areas shown on these maps in New Mexico and Southern Colorado using the stock PRL on my EVO LTE. Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

I have only seen chicks do that. My wife does it all the time. Pisses me off. I find cargo pants and shorts are the best wardrobe choices for smartphones. Heck, I have one pair that will hold my Kindle Fire. Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

open forum Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

I bore of these rants. *yawn* Or should I say, iBore? Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

You got a buck...you're in luck! Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Runner's Knee Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

I don't want to say definitively until I complete this intensive schedule study I'm working on. But if I were using deductive reasoning skills based on what ive seen so far, I'd say yes. Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

High Wire Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Could be kind of fun. Id love to see Hesse's face when one of his store employees says that a LTE device will work on WiMax, or one of his CSR's says that the Galaxy Nexus doesn't support LTE...and is 3G only. Or maybe we can watch his face turn red when someone calls in and says S4GRU posted an article that says you are blocking my LTE! What gives??? Robert via Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner

To answer all the questions: Q: Is the Nexus really not supported by lte even though all documents say so? A: This is ridiculous. Of course the Galaxy Nexus is LTE capable. We have had dozens of confirmed reports where S4GRU members have used the Galaxy Nexus on Sprint LTE. Q: Is lte really been pushed back again to fall for dfw? A: No. Please see our article for an accurate account of the DFW Schedule Progress. Q: Is the reception really supposed to only be in downtown areas till 2013? A: No. Please see our article for maps of coverages. As you can see, Sprint is not starting in Downtown Areas, they are starting in outlier areas and working inward. Q: And lastly are sprint customer service agents brain damaged?!?!?! A. A few. If your account is accurate, you must have found one. I don't know even what to think of this thread. The info you are reporting is so absurd and not even close to reality. I don't know if you are trolling, or if you found the most boneheaded Sprint rep in the whole company. Robert

The last reference I saw was the final markets will start in December 2013 and finish up around April 2014. Robert via Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner

Bakersfield is in the Lower Central Valley market. Work will not begin there until 2013. Robert

I'm actually almost qualified for the job. Too funny. Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Hunts Ketchup Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

I don't like seeing 3 year project, but cool other than that. Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

The info came direct from within Sprint. The data is so voluminous, it would take 1000's of hours for the source to create the fraud. In our Sponsor section we have complete maps of every Sprint site in the country. Also, we have interactive maps showing all the sites that are complete to date in every market. In our Premier Sponsor section we have maps showing all the NV sites being upgraded this year with schedule info. Our members are going out with these maps and verifying data. Its quite exciting to watch the deployment occur right before their eyes. I only wish I lived in a market with active deployment myself. Sprint will likely announce a launch target for this market (and several others) as they launch Atlanta and San Antonio here in the next few weeks. I understand where you are coming from. Sprint has a lot to prove to its customers. As the saying goes, its time for them to put up or shut up. However, Sprint is not handling the deployment themselves. In the DC market, Sprint hired Alcatel/Lucent, who has been under contract for some time. ALU and their subcontractors have spent millions getting the market ready and mobilizing. They have been there since March getting things ready and have started converting sites. There is no turning back now. The ship has sailed. All that being said, if Sprint runs into cash flow problems, they will slow down Network Vision. But most likely in markets they are just about to start, not ones already mobilized. Robert

I received the email. Interesting... Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

I have the same issue here, but in my case, its the GNex. Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

That's the only site scheduled for 4G LTE to go on air in Florida this month. However, its usually 45 days from the time NV works starts in a market before the first site goes live with LTE. So, if Ericsson mobilized in Tampa June 1st, the first site would go on air around Mid July. So, it is possible. We have a Tampa article coming soon. Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

And then consider the fact that the cablecos are using unlicensed spectrum for free, and then refusing to allow someone to roam on it, even though they want to pay you for it. It may be the very definition of anti-competitive. I see a FCC hand smacking coming. Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner