Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Boston Market (all of Massachusetts)


brendan4t

Recommended Posts

This coverage stretches down from Braintree Square Rte 37 to just before the Rehab hospital going towards Holbrook. Strongest in Braintree Square at 16 mbps down to 5 mbps down outside my parents house.. this tower upgrade unfortunately did not help indoor coverage inside my parent's place =\

 

Just got 16mbps down across from the Olympian diner in Braintree

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in needham today. LTE lit up on my phone. Mapped the one spot i had it on sensorly. Don't see a tower in the last update that i could have been connected too. Also i had it for 5 minutes then lost it. Did not move, was sitting in my car waiting for someone to get out of the supermarket.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got some 4g LTE love today driving from Braintree toward Brockton. 128 to rt 24

around Harrison Blvd. Sporadic though with only 6gb download speeds.

Got to Brockton but the signal disappeared.

Kinda bummed about that. Hopefully they'll get that area hooked up soon.

 

Try down town on legion parkway, the tower behind Harbor One is upgraded and the Wal-Mart on the Abington Brockton border is upgraded, I was there a week ago and saw the upgrade. You can also try crescent St. by Christos, Comcast, Massasoit college. I don’t have a LTE phone as yet, I’m holding out until they upgrade the South Side of town. I need that Note 2!! if you go over there let me know what speeds you are getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in my back yard.

 

You shouldn't need these permits to upgrade existing towers. The fcc grants a license, it should be clear to proceed. This is what drives costs up for us all.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Sprint isn't showing their customers they really give a hell. Not showing up at a routine Council Meeting which is mandatory and Sprint knows this. They get rejected, all on Sprint. That is total crap and I am pissed off. I live in Waltham. Now we know why we get lousy Sprint coverage. This is probably happening everywhere if it happened in Waltham. Total Fail on Sprint. Thank God they got bought out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint isn't showing their customers they really give a hell. Not showing up at a routine Council Meeting which is mandatory and Sprint knows this. They get rejected' date=' all on Sprint. That is total crap and I am pissed off. I live in Waltham. Now we know why we get lousy Sprint coverage. This is probably happening everywhere if it happened in Waltham. Total Fail on Sprint. Thank God they got bought out.[/quote']

 

Alcatel Lucent was supposed to attend the meeting. Not Sprint. Your rant violates our posting guidelines.

 

Robert via LG Viper with ICS using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint isn't showing their customers they really give a hell. Not showing up at a routine Council Meeting which is mandatory and Sprint knows this. They get rejected, all on Sprint. That is total crap and I am pissed off. I live in Waltham. Now we know why we get lousy Sprint coverage. This is probably happening everywhere if it happened in Waltham. Total Fail on Sprint. Thank God they got bought out.

You do not know all the circumstances,, you only know what someone said happen. You don't know why it happened. I am willing to bet my life that sprint is not walking around saying "let's screw our customers and just not do anything". People have infantile mentalities sometimes when they don't get what they want when they want it. Your lte will be on soon enough. They are not out to screw Waltham. There is a reason for everything and just because we don't know the reason why certain things happen does not mean it's automatically sprint doing something wrong.. 13 years with sprint and they have done nothing but good by me.

 

EVO-LUTION 4G LTE

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picked up LTE near Canton, MA today while riding the commuter rail into Boston on the Providence line. Signal went live right before the Canton MBTA station and stayed lit until a bit after. Was able to map one blip of it on Sensorly. Based on the sponsor maps, not sure where the LTE signal was coming from. I had not previously picked up LTE from either of the two existing towers in Norwood and Stoughton. I guess it is possible that the Canton tower marked as 3G complete is putting out an LTE test signal. Good news either way.

 

Hopefully more LTE gets lit soon along the commuter rail lines.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picked up LTE near Canton' date=' MA today while riding the commuter rail into Boston on the Providence line. Signal went live right before the Canton MBTA station and stayed lit until a bit after. Was able to map one blip of it on Sensorly. Based on the sponsor maps, not sure where the LTE signal was coming from. I had not previously picked up LTE from either of the two existing towers in Norwood and Stoughton. I guess it is possible that the Canton tower marked as 3G complete is putting out an LTE test signal. Good news either way.

 

Hopefully more LTE gets lit soon along the commuter rail lines.[/quote']

 

I wonder if the WiFi on the trains is feeding off of AT&T's LTE, or if it's still 3G. I remember back in the day when it used Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I wonder if the WiFi on the trains is feeding off of AT&T's LTE, or if it's still 3G. I remember back in the day when it used Sprint.

 

I think its pretty heavily advertised on the side of all the WiFi enabled coaches that the service on the commuter rail is provided by AT&T. I know they still won't allow you to use too much bandwidth though.

Slow as molasses on the Lowell Line.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MBTA WiFi is terrible unless the train has no one on it, 3G is usually quicker for basic stuff.

 

Live in Hull, MA and get 4G randomly on occasion, from the Hingham tower I assume, but very rare.

 

Beacon Hill now seems solid.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any one picking up any LTE in the lower pioneer valley(Springfield metro). I am looking at getting either the Note 2,S3 or the iphone 5 and was wondering if i would get any 4g.

 

There's a couple of towers active in Springfield. There's one in Agawam and Longmeadow. Looks like there's a new one in Holyoke as well. if yo check the sensorly maps you can get a good idea ofvthe coverage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got 4G at my work today for the first time (in Wilmington near exit 41 of I-93). 10up/10down. Someone who works half a mile south of me reported a 4G signal on XDA last Thursday, but I didn't see anything until today. I also finally applied the firmware update to my EVO LTE over the weekend, so I may be picking up a signal that the old radio firmware couldn't find. I wonder if BS54XC875 will show up as 4G in the next update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...