Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Boston Market (all of Massachusetts)


brendan4t

Recommended Posts

Anyone know what is going on with Sprint in downtown Boston (specifically Boston Common).

 

3G was out all day right in front of the state house - stuck on 1x only. Other areas around are fine, seems like the 3G at that one tower went out.

 

Not sure if it is network vision related, thunderstorm related (from last night), or something else. Usually 3G speeds are very good in this area.

 

 

I need a bit more than this to stream my radio in the morning:

 

 

Holy moly! "Martha, I think the well done run dry!!!"

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know what is going on with Sprint in downtown Boston (specifically Boston Common).

 

3G was out all day right in front of the state house - stuck on 1x only. Other areas around are fine, seems like the 3G at that one tower went out.

 

Not sure if it is network vision related, thunderstorm related (from last night), or something else. Usually 3G speeds are very good in this area.

 

 

I need a bit more than this to stream my radio in the morning:

 

 

Same thing happening to me today. I am sitting at the corner of State St. and Congress St., and according to Netmonitor, I am bouncing between towers with BID 864 (Post Office Sq/Kilby St. and Milk St.) and 608 (Broad St. and Franklin St.), each with terrible 1X data rates.

 

It is hard for me to map the Netmonitor towers to sites on the Sponor maps since I only see one NV site in this area on the Sponsor map (BS54XC906, Broad St. and MIlk St., which I assume is BID 608). If this is the case, then tower with BID 864 does not even appear on the NV maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard for me to map the Netmonitor towers to sites on the Sponor maps since I only see one NV site in this area on the Sponsor map (BS54XC906, Broad St. and MIlk St., which I assume is BID 608). If this is the case, then tower with BID 864 does not even appear on the NV maps.

 

I have found that the lat/lon coordinates reported in Netmonitor can be very flaky. In my area, Netmonitor reports two towers at least a couple of miles apart with close BID numbers. And Netmonitor's log screen color-coded these sites Blue, which is supposed to mean that the towers themselves are squawking their coordinates. But I went looking for them yesterday (in a residential neighborhood) and could find no towers whatsoever near those coordinates. There is a big tower site roughly halfway between them on a north-south line, but offset a bit to the west, which does appear on the S4GRU maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in Minnesota, and my 3G was out from 12:00pm-7:00pm CST. I called support about 1:00pm, and they thought the outage was only affecting new subs, but clearly it was more wide spread. I was hoping it was an backhaul upgrade that everyone is talking about, but I'm not too sure yet.

One thing that I've noticed, is I get better signal strength at work (1/2 mile from tower), but slower data speeds. At home, which is about 2 miles from the tower, I get a lower signal strength, but faster data speeds (200-500kbps download, and sometimes 300-600kbps upload). We're a small town, and I think they only have one tower. Could the 3G connection come from a different source/tower, than the voice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in Minnesota, and my 3G was out from 12:00pm-7:00pm CST. I called support about 1:00pm, and they thought the outage was only affecting new subs, but clearly it was more wide spread. I was hoping it was an backhaul upgrade that everyone is talking about, but I'm not too sure yet.

One thing that I've noticed, is I get better signal strength at work (1/2 mile from tower), but slower data speeds. At home, which is about 2 miles from the tower, I get a lower signal strength, but faster data speeds (200-500kbps download, and sometimes 300-600kbps upload). We're a small town, and I think they only have one tower. Could the 3G connection come from a different source/tower, than the voice?

 

It's unlikely but possible. There are only a few towers left in Minnesota that don't have 3G EVDO on them so it is likely that your 3G is still coming from the same tower as voice is. What is your zip code?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The zip code is 56093, Waseca. I just did tests this morning and I got 1300kbps download, and 263kbps upload at work. I did it 10 secs later from the same spot and got 360kbps download and 103kbps upload. So you're probably right. It's very inconsistant though. The tower is located on the south side of town on Hwy 13 (MS03NP137 I think).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same thing happening to me today. I am sitting at the corner of State St. and Congress St., and according to Netmonitor, I am bouncing between towers with BID 864 (Post Office Sq/Kilby St. and Milk St.) and 608 (Broad St. and Franklin St.), each with terrible 1X data rates.

 

It is hard for me to map the Netmonitor towers to sites on the Sponor maps since I only see one NV site in this area on the Sponsor map (BS54XC906, Broad St. and MIlk St., which I assume is BID 608). If this is the case, then tower with BID 864 does not even appear on the NV maps.

 

Well, fingers crossed they are actually working on our towers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The zip code is 56093, Waseca. I just did tests this morning and I got 1300kbps download, and 263kbps upload at work. I did it 10 secs later from the same spot and got 360kbps download and 103kbps upload. So you're probably right. It's very inconsistant though. The tower is located on the south side of town on Hwy 13 (MS03NP137 I think).

 

There's only one tower in Waseca and if you get 3G at all then your tower definitely has 3G on it with the 1X voice. According the Sprint network website, you are getting a data capacity add in the next 6 months which is just another EV carrier being added but not a T1 backhaul. So this may mean the backhaul is sufficient right now but there are too many users on the current EV carrier so they are adding a new one. The variability in speedtests can be apparent because you're not the only user on a tower and someone could have just started loading facebook or a youtube video so your speeds aren't half bad if you're able to pull over 1200 kbps at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised that I got that 1200kbps too, I did the same test after work and it was only 80kbps. I was at a soccer game in Prior Lake tonight, and got around 150kbps, Mankato has horrible speeds too. I hope Sprint is commited in changing things around in southern Minnesota. I guess Verizon is very close to having LTE here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised that I got that 1200kbps too' date=' I did the same test after work and it was only 80kbps. I was at a soccer game in Prior Lake tonight, and got around 150kbps, Mankato has horrible speeds too. I hope Sprint is commited in changing things around in southern Minnesota. I guess Verizon is very close to having LTE here.[/quote']

 

They are upgrading every last tower in the market.

 

Sent from my Jelly Bean Toro using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was reading the minutes of the Waltham city counsel meeting and sprint applied for 2 permits to work upgrade sites. I can see that one was approved. Glad its the one close to me. Hopefully this is another sign that NV and LTE are coming my way.

 

Here is the Special permit application

 

 

Sprint, 1 International Blvd, Mahwah, NJ 0745 and Pinnacle Towers, Inc. Sarasota, FL. hereby

petition the Waltham City Council for a special permit pursuant to Sections 3.512, 3.621, and

10.56 of the City of Waltham Zoning Ordinance, to modify, operate and upgrade a wireless

communication facility on the existing building located on the property located at 39

Sachem Street (Atlas Map R0033, Block 001, Parcel 0005), including replacing three (3)

wireless antenna with (6) wireless antennas mounted to the Lattice Tower and painted to match

same. The Petitioners also propose to replace two (2) ancillary cabinets with two (2) new cabinets locates on existing steel dunnage, install nine (9) RRH mounted to the wireless

antenna on the tower, install one (1) Fiber Distributions Box mounted to ice bridge supports.

Replace a small Global Positioning System (GPS) antenna, which is necessary for E911

compliance. The proposal is shown on the Plans submitted by the Petitioners, which are

incorporated herein by reference.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant to post this last week and forgot. Took a trip to the Burlington Mall on Thursday and just before leaving to head back home, I remembered that there has been some LTE work done nearby. So, I put my new SGS3 into LTE mode and.... no LTE signal. However, a speedtest of the 3g signal was really good. around 1.6 down 0.9 up. Way better than I've come to expect over the last year. Yay NV! Can't wait until it arrives closer to home.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same thing happening to me today. I am sitting at the corner of State St. and Congress St., and according to Netmonitor, I am bouncing between towers with BID 864 (Post Office Sq/Kilby St. and Milk St.) and 608 (Broad St. and Franklin St.), each with terrible 1X data rates.

 

It is hard for me to map the Netmonitor towers to sites on the Sponor maps since I only see one NV site in this area on the Sponsor map (BS54XC906, Broad St. and MIlk St., which I assume is BID 608). If this is the case, then tower with BID 864 does not even appear on the NV maps.

 

This is happening to me again today on my EVO 4G LTE. I am being bounced around several towers in downtown Boston (near State and Congress), all of which are providing painfully slow data speeds (.12 down, .33 up). I hope this means they are working on the sites.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

so I found this tower that is supposedly broadcasting 3G/4G, located downtown at Quincy Market.

 

7636507670_cc1ce6c1bf_c.jpg

7636506042_6646ac3ecd_c.jpg

Sadly, 3G speeds were only so-so (600-1300kbps) and 4G was not to be found. I checked LTE record and nothing was there and no eHRPD available, just EVDO Rev A.

 

This is also the first Sprint network vision antenna I have seen without the RRU under it. Maybe they mounted it on the roof? Or maybe no RRU for this location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is happening to me again today on my EVO 4G LTE. I am being bounced around several towers in downtown Boston (near State and Congress), all of which are providing painfully slow data speeds (.12 down, .33 up). I hope this means they are working on the sites.

 

Many parts of Boston have really slowed down as of late. Pretty much all of downtown seems to have become just about unusable. Not sure what's going on... but it's become so slow, I can no longer stream radio, at all, which is annoying.

 

Personally, I would rather be annoyed for a month or two while they upgrade, but I am sure there are countless sprint users that have no idea why their experience is so horrible. I am just glad LTE is on the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so I found this tower that is supposedly broadcasting 3G/4G, located downtown at Quincy Market.

 

[pics removed]

 

Sadly, 3G speeds were only so-so (600-1300kbps) and 4G was not to be found. I checked LTE record and nothing was there and no eHRPD available, just EVDO Rev A.

 

This is also the first Sprint network vision antenna I have seen without the RRU under it. Maybe they mounted it on the roof? Or maybe no RRU for this location?

 

I walked over there yesterday as welll and stood right under the tower. I experienced similar so-so 3G speeds and 4G never connected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I walked over there yesterday as welll and stood right under the tower. I experienced similar so-so 3G speeds and 4G never connected.

 

But if you walk up to cambridge street and hook onto Sprint's antennas above whole foods, you will hit 2mbit+ all day long. Even the antenna above the giant tea kettle at Government Center seems to perform really well.

 

I am guessing that the location at quincy market doesn't have new backhaul yet? Whatever is it, it was disappointing, heh.

 

 

Typical sprint speeds elsewhere in downtown Boston:

7637711852_5eb75baefe.jpg

Took me about 8 tries before I could complete a speedtest. Speeds at this locations have been on a death spiral for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant to post this last week and forgot. Took a trip to the Burlington Mall on Thursday and just before leaving to head back home, I remembered that there has been some LTE work done nearby. So, I put my new SGS3 into LTE mode and.... no LTE signal. However, a speedtest of the 3g signal was really good. around 1.6 down 0.9 up. Way better than I've come to expect over the last year. Yay NV! Can't wait until it arrives closer to home.

 

Yup, the tower at the Burlington Mall is one of the better ones I've found. When I first activated my EVO LTE at the Sprint store there I was blown away with the speeds. However, the tower you're connecting to is BS13XC745, which is 3G only. The 4G tower is BS03XC011, which is on the other side of Lahey Clinic at the Marriott. Even when parked in the Marriott parking lot I haven't been able to connect to LTE, so you didn't miss much.

 

This is also the first Sprint network vision antenna I have seen without the RRU under it. Maybe they mounted it on the roof? Or maybe no RRU for this location?

 

I see two antennas in your pictures -- one white antenna mounted on the roof itself, and one brown one hanging over the side. Perhaps the one on the roof has an adjacent RUU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see two antennas in your pictures -- one white antenna mounted on the roof itself, and one brown one hanging over the side. Perhaps the one on the roof has an adjacent RUU.

 

Pretty sure it's not an antenna - just some sort of ventilation pipe.

 

Sorry for the horrible photos - just a quick grab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The speeds in Boston have been really bad lately. Just dying for 4g to light up on my phone. it does suck that right now i can barely use the internet if im in or around Boston. Def looking at it as a good sign that LTE work is getting done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure it's not an antenna - just some sort of ventilation pipe.

 

Looking at Google Maps, the white things are definitely antennas. There are three of them, they're mounted on tripods (so they're not pipes), and they have black cables running to them:

 

Itdax.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at Google Maps, the white things are definitely antennas. There are three of them, they're mounted on tripods (so they're not pipes), and they have black cables running to them:

 

 

Nice, good catch

 

I wonder if those are for another carrier. The pic I took was definitely sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yahoo! My mother just called me and asked why it keeps flashing 4g on her viper. She works in Lynn ma. Maybe it's testing or it coming live idk but confirmed LTE l! Also eHRPD in swampscott the other day.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yahoo! My mother just called me and asked why it keeps flashing 4g on her viper. She works in Lynn ma. Maybe it's testing or it coming live idk but confirmed LTE l! Also eHRPD in swampscott the other day.

 

Appreciate the update!

 

Still EVDO RevA in downtown Boston :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...