Jump to content

802.11ah in 900 MHz HaLow Wi-Fi Advancements


Ascertion

Recommended Posts

Looks like WiFi AC is already going to be behind the curve.  WiFi ah will be the new standard.  Utilized on the 900Mhz network.  I'm very excited about this.

http://www.engadget.com/2016/01/04/new-wifi-standard-gives-more-range-with-less-power/

 

Does anyone know what kind of household items would interfere with 900Mhz?  For example, I know microwave ovens create interference with 2.4Ghz networks.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't think of anything in my house that uses 900mhz right now. This would be good for where I live right now because we have a fairly large house that our router has a hard time penetrating through all the walls. That and the next door neighbor is a couple acres away, so we shouldn't too much interference on that front. Now, my girlfriend living in the city of Richmond, VA is another story. I'm kind of exited to see how this plays out. I know baby monitors use 900mhz, but what else does exactly? I can't even think of much.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My parents' WISP is on 900 MHz.  And there's tons of interference in the band; I can't imagine this helping that any.

 

- Trip

WISP is using that cause there probably isn't much congestion if any. 

 

I can see congestion being an issue depending on where you live, just like 2.4GHz.  But overall nice to get 26MHz of free lowband WiFi. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WISP is using that cause there probably isn't much congestion if any.

 

No, the WISP is using it because the gear was cheap on eBay.  They keep changing frequencies to try to avoid interference, which also keeps moving around.

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 900 mhz range is super congested. I'd be curious how it would perform.

Not that congested anymore.  The bloat always moves upward.

 

Higher frequency = better, at least in the minds of typical, stupid, number-obsessed Americans.  Look at 5.8 GHz cordless landline phones...  Garbage is an understatement, but newer phones, which work in the 1800-1900 MHz range, are sold as "DECT 6.0" to basically trick the idiots.

 

Basically, the VHF (40-50MHz) public spectrum gave way to 900, which gave way to 2400, and now 5800 for certain things.  Each time a new, higher band is introduced, lots of the things that populated the previous "popular" band tend to abandon it to jump on the high frequency bandwagon.

 

I still use a 900MHz DSSS cordless phone and run into zero interference issues, and quite like the ability to walk around a decent portion of my subdivision with it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only system communicating on 900 Mhz in my house is the Honeywell Prestige thermostat, its wireless temperature sensor, and the Redlink internet gateway it attaches to for web access. That's essentially what 900 Mhz continues to be used for these days. I also have a late 90s vintage Uniden cordless phone that runs on 900 Mhz but I don't use it in favor of the newer 1900 Mhz "DECT 6.0" Panasonic phones with caller ID and much better sound quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like WiFi AC is already going to be behind the curve. WiFi ah will be the new standard. Utilized on the 900Mhz network. I'm very excited about this.

http://www.engadget.com/2016/01/04/new-wifi-standard-gives-more-range-with-less-power/

 

Does anyone know what kind of household items would interfere with 900Mhz? For example, I know microwave ovens create interference with 2.4Ghz networks.

Everything known to God interferes with 900. Pagers, smart meters, SCADA, sometimes mobile wireless, some fixed wireless, cordless phones, baby monitors, door openers, etc., etc.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WISP is using that cause there probably isn't much congestion if any.

 

I can see congestion being an issue depending on where you live, just like 2.4GHz. But overall nice to get 26MHz of free lowband WiFi.

900 MHz congestion is almost universal.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the WISP is using it because the gear was cheap on eBay. They keep changing frequencies to try to avoid interference, which also keeps moving around.

 

- Trip

900 MHz gear usually isn't any cheaper than 2.4 or 5 GHz gear. It is tremendously better at foliage penetration, though.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...