Jump to content

Motorola IHDT56UC1 (Moto X 2015(?))

atomic50

By atomic50
in Motorola

 Share

Recommended Posts

atomic50 Member Level: iDEN *chirp*

atomic50

Posted
Posted

New Motorola smartphone (Sprint compatible) passes through the FCC. Looks like a large device. 

 

Dimensions

153.6 mm x 75.3 mm (161.8 mm diagonal)

6.05" x 2.97" (6.37" diagonal)

 

US LTE Bands

2 4 5 12 13 17 25 26 41

 

LTE Carrier Aggregation Pairs:

2/4+2/4/5/12/13/17

5/12/13+2/4

17+2

41+41

 

Other Features

VoLTE

VoWiFi 

Turbo Charging

 

FCC docs

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted

Another giant phone...why must phones keep getting bigger!!!?

 

Sent from my M8

Because it's an obsession for the biggest phablet!

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

6.4" display.. damn.. big phablet or a small tablet. 

 

That is the full handset diagonal, not the display diagonal.  All told, this handset is about 5 mm smaller in both length and width than the Nexus 6.

 

Or, to put it in another perspective, it is about 10 mm longer and 3 mm wider than the 2014 Moto X.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mikejeep · Posted

      It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • mdob07
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mdob07 · Posted

      Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
    • CalebM
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By CalebM · Posted

      Interesting, I saw this too on my AT&T S22 while roaming on US Cellular. I thought it was an Android bug since CellMapper was doing the same thing (didn't get a screenshot of that one). N66 makes more sense than N1. 
    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mikejeep · Posted

      Thanks, that was good timing, I did see your report as I was buttoning up this latest update and added an override for that.. did it not work?   Ok, was that on AT&T also? Please send a report if you happen to see it again and safely have the opportunity. You can always do the long-press on the fly and then send a later one with an explanation pointing to the earlier one.. your username is attached to the long-press reports, so it's not an issue.
    • mdob07
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mdob07 · Posted

      I sent a report in earlier, n66 reporting as n1. There should be two different reports, I couldn't find the button the first time so I just long pressed the connection type to send, then I remembered where it was. I put a note about the issue on the 2nd report. Both reports from me are for the same issue. Also, it might have been on a prior release but earlier this week I also saw n66 reported as n65 on the app. I was driving and wasn't able to send a report in for that one. 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...