Jump to content

Are Multi-Mode SatCOLTs with 4G a possibility for Sprint?


4GHoward

Recommended Posts

Yes. If the polarity can be reversed.

 

????????

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. If the polarity can be reversed.

 

...of the flux capacitor? That would require 1.21 gigawatts.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to figure out what a SatCOLT is.

Are you talking about satellite cellsite on light truck? I think the COWs are the next generation of that, right?

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

 

That is exactly what it is. Has anyone seen it in person? Please post your images if you have any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

That is exactly what it is. Has anyone seen it in person? Please post your images if you have any.

 

Yeah see them all the time here. All college football season long there is one parked outside my stadium...also when I make the trip to Charlotte 2x a year for the NASCAR race there are multiple inside the track in the infield. One actually within spitting distance of my campsite. For that race they even truck in the bigger 18wheeler one too on top of the reg COW...

I'll take pics this year...

 

One question id have is if COWs will have LTE on them in near future...

 

Another is where do the COWs get their backhaul from? They have to literally plug up to a fiber line as i can't recall seeing a microwave radome on the things...or is it from something else?...

 

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah see them all the time here. All college football season long there is one parked outside my stadium...also when I make the trip to Charlotte 2x a year for the NASCAR race there are multiple inside the track in the infield. One actually within spitting distance of my campsite. For that race they even truck in the bigger 18wheeler one too on top of the reg COW...

I'll take pics this year...

 

One question id have is if COWs will have LTE on them in near future...

 

Another is where do the COWs get their backhaul from? They have to literally plug up to a fiber line as i can't recall seeing a microwave radome on the things...or is it from something else?...

 

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

 

I was wondering that too. It almost can't be from satellite because you would need a lot of bandwidth (especially for LTE)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering that too. It almost can't be from satellite because you would need a lot of bandwidth (especially for LTE)

 

Is that what LightSquared tried to do and what Dish Network is trying to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering that too. It almost can't be from satellite because you would need a lot of bandwidth (especially for LTE)

 

Well Wiki says "... The backhaul to the network can be via terrestrial microwave, communication satellite, or existing wired infrastructure...."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_on_wheels

 

Just never noticed one with a microwave radome on it, nor noticed cables from the ground running into it either...Deff will be taking a close look at the COW's at the race next month and in October...usually run across the operator of the sites at least once during the race weekend so i'll get some questions at him when i see him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Wiki says "... The backhaul to the network can be via terrestrial microwave, communication satellite, or existing wired infrastructure...."

http://en.wikipedia..../Cell_on_wheels

 

Just never noticed one with a microwave radome on it, nor noticed cables from the ground running into it either...Deff will be taking a close look at the COW's at the race next month and in October...usually run across the operator of the sites at least once during the race weekend so i'll get some questions at him when i see him...

 

If you happen to see the COWs, may you please take some good up close pictures?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: I could be wrong, but this is my take on all of that.

 

Lightsquared was going to convert Satellite spectrum for terrestrial and satellite use for end users. They would supplement the terrestrial network with satellite coverage. I believe all the backhaul for the network was going to be fiber/microwave. That is why they were planning on teaming with Sprint.

 

Dish is in a similar situation. They are proposing to convert satellite spectrum for terrestrial network also, but I have no idea if they are going to supplement with satellite coverage.

 

Also, after researching more, satellite backhaul can provide the bandwidth for COW and SatCOLT, but would not be optimal for voice communications. There would be some issues with delays, but everything else would be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you happen to see the COWs, may you please take some good up close pictures?

 

yeah no problem. like I said ill be able to get right up on the thing easily at the race.

 

Though there are many pics online of COWs and all the different types of them online all over...but ill take some at the race still

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: I could be wrong, but this is my take on all of that.

 

Lightsquared was going to convert Satellite spectrum for terrestrial and satellite use for end users. They would supplement the terrestrial network with satellite coverage. I believe all the backhaul for the network was going to be fiber/microwave. That is why they were planning on teaming with Sprint.

 

Dish is in a similar situation. They are proposing to convert satellite spectrum for terrestrial network also, but I have no idea if they are going to supplement with satellite coverage.

 

Also, after researching more, satellite backhaul can provide the bandwidth for COW and SatCOLT, but would not be optimal for voice communications. There would be some issues with delays, but everything else would be fine.

 

I know for a fact that only HughesNet and ViaSat, formerly WildBlue are the only primary satellite internet providers, but I am not that familiar with their type of technology and backhaul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah no problem. like I said ill be able to get right up on the thing easily at the race.

 

Though there are many pics online of COWs and all the different types of them online all over...but ill take some at the race still

 

I just want a better inside look as online is not that close up. Thank you for contributing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for a fact that only HughesNet and WildBlue are the only primary satellite internet providers, but I am not that familiar with their type of technology and backhaul.

 

I think it is pretty cost prohibitive to use satellite for backhaul. It works for something temporary like a COW in an emergency situation or otherwise where infrastructure is unavailable. For many other situations like an event (such as the races SGT was referencing) that Sprint always supplements with their COWs, I would think they would have microwave backhaul from one of their nearby towers, fiber or last mile backhaul, or pull from the facility's connection if it is sufficient.

 

I know when I was deployed, we had satellite internet and it was several thousand dollars per month for 1mbps. That was in 2004 though and in the middle of Baghdad... so I don't know how relevant it is in this example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want a better inside look as online is not that close up.

 

To quote German existentialist philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, "When you look at the COW, the COW looks back at you."

 

2f0892c008a00f240fe5b010.L.jpg

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is pretty cost prohibitive to use satellite for backhaul. It works for something temporary like a COW in an emergency situation or otherwise where infrastructure is unavailable. For many other situations like an event (such as the races SGT was referencing) that Sprint always supplements with their COWs, I would think they would have microwave backhaul from one of their nearby towers, fiber or last mile backhaul, or pull from the facility's connection if it is sufficient.

 

I know when I was deployed, we had satellite internet and it was several thousand dollars per month for 1mbps. That was in 2004 though and in the middle of Baghdad... so I don't know how relevant it is in this example.

 

 

How will it work if some catastrophic event occurs like a hurricane or a tornado? It can get electricity from generators, but It has to get backhaul from somewhere. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How will it work if some catastrophic event occurs like a hurricane or a tornado? It can get electricity from generators, but It has to get backhaul from somewhere. Right?

 

Correct, like I said, "It works for something temporary like a COW in an emergency situation or otherwise where infrastructure is unavailable."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another point is that if use VoIP, it only use about 100 Kbps of bandwidth, not much compared to a video chat. How much bandwidth does cellular voice runs on?

 

1xRTT is 153kbps max. That is what all of Sprint's cellular voice runs on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...