Jump to content

Create an "Industry" forum for non-NV/Sprint-related news items


sbolen
 Share

Recommended Posts

First time caller, long-time listener... (Go ahead, caller)

 

We have some of the best and brightest minds in wireless that gather to talk about Sprint. While the moderation is top-notch when it comes to shutting down discussions that veer way off topic with regards to other carriers, I think it would benefit the community to have a spot for S4GRU members to talk about the wireless landscape as a whole, as Sprint attempts to fend off T-Mobile as the #3 carrier, AT&T hits snags with deployments, Verizon adds a random letter to "LTE" and rolls out a giant campaign around it, etc.
 
Just looking at the first page of results in the "General Topics" area, I could see the following Network-related threads existing in this sub-forum:

 

TL;DR: Can we have a forum where we can discuss the state of the wireless industry in the U.S.?

 

Thanks, I'll hang up and listen.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First time caller, long-time listener... (Go ahead, caller)

 

We have some of the best and brightest minds in wireless that gather to talk about Sprint. While the moderation is top-notch when it comes to shutting down discussions that veer way off topic with regards to other carriers, I think it would benefit the community to have a spot for S4GRU members to talk about the wireless landscape as a whole, as Sprint attempts to fend off T-Mobile as the #3 carrier, AT&T hits snags with deployments, Verizon adds a random letter to "LTE" and rolls out a giant campaign around it, etc.

 

Just looking at the first page of results in the "General Topics" area, I could see the following Network-related threads existing in this sub-forum:

 

TL;DR: Can we have a forum where we can discuss the state of the wireless industry in the U.S.?

 

Thanks, I'll hang up and listen.

 

Yeah, I agree with you 100%, but we have one already. It's called "General Topics"  :P. Oh, you want a sub forum? Sure!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We allow topics on other providers. They are closely monitored and have to follow the posting guidelines explicitly. They cannot be anti-Sprint, or overly promotional or virtual advertisements for other providers. They need to be more technical in nature and expand the intellectual discussion of networks and enhance understanding.

 

Members can add other provider topics in the General Topics forum. If a thread requires constant moderating and takes too much time to keep it on course because of consistent problems or trolling, then we will shut it down.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We allow topics on other providers. They are closely monitored and have to follow the posting guidelines explicitly. They cannot be anti-Sprint, or overly promotional or virtual advertisements for other providers. They need to be more technical in nature and expand the intellectual discussion of networks and enhance understanding.

 

Members can add other provider topics in the General Topics forum. If a thread requires constant moderating and takes too much time to keep it on course because of consistent problems or trolling, then we will shut it down.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

Could the posting guidelines be updated to reflect what is certainly permitted regarding other carriers?  I know sometimes the rules have changed frequently brought on by discussions in various threads, where the change is also announced, and it is hard to stay up to date on what is acceptable without monitoring every thread for issues that have arose.  I know at some point it was became against the rules to post speedtests from other carriers, and if I can remember correctly at some point it was also against the rules to discuss other carriers at one point in time.  Would just be nice to have a singular place to refer to for future reference.  I don't want to find out I posted something unacceptable after the fact.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1197-s4gru-posting-guidelines-aka-the-rulez/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mine is still working fine here in Raleigh.   There were some outages related to the snow storm.    I have seen it take a couple of days to recover from storms.   It is not among the highest priority services.  
    • Looks like my MB gold at my office was finally decommissioned sometime last week. It was working the previous week and I was out of town last week. I came in today and it was powered down. I unplugged it and plugged it back in but it just keeps looping through trying to establish a connection. Looks like it's time to add it to our ewaste pile.
    • I did spot some NRCA in Crown Heights last weekend. Sadly because I'm using an iPhone I can't see the exact carrier combo but it did report that it was seeing 2 NR carriers. At first I thought it was a glitch or some weird stale data because my phone was still reporting NSA 5G and the primary NR carrier was the 80MHz n41 carrier but reading Sascha's article it's quite possible that my phone was using B2+B66 +n41+n41.  — — — — — On another note, it looks like someone found n5+n77+B2+B66 on Verizon:  Edit:  Two more confirmed locations of conversion sites:  T-Mobile eNB 875316 Location: 40.7314623618499, -73.82849493999701   T-Mobile eNB 875868 Location: 40.75304305996773, -73.85311593221213
    • This entire FAA argument is stupid with no evidence at all that there is an issue with C-band.  You may be right that there is some conspiracy nut involved. The guard-band between what aircraft altimeters use and cellular C-band is 220MHz.  If any safety critical aircraft altimeter is reading signals from 220MHz away from the frequencies it is designed to use, that is a very broken safety critical device and should have been replaced it long ago.  Everything in an aircraft is designed and certified for precision and is checked regularly.  The aircraft is not designated as airworthy for instrument flight if the systems in it are not certified to be precise and in good working order.  If an altimeter is so broken that it is off by more than 220MHz from the frequencies it is designed to use, it could just as easily be off by 1GHz or more which would likely cause it to fall into other frequencies that are also already in use. 
    • https://www.pcmag.com/news/exclusive-we-found-t-mobiles-secret-weapon-against-c-band Seems like he's seeing: B2+B66 +n41+n41 n71+n41 Not that it really matters, I suppose:  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...