Jump to content

Permits on towers?


Recommended Posts

So I have been curious that with all the holdup on the LTE deployment apparently from what I've read on other forums it seems to be caused by either birds or permits on towers. Why would you need a permit to work on a tower? AT&T, Verizon, and T-mobile all got their towers upgraded quick without permit holdups, so what's the deal with Sprint?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I have been curious that with all the holdup on the LTE deployment apparently from what I've read on other forums it seems to be caused by either birds or permits on towers. Why would you need a permit to work on a tower? AT&T, Verizon, and T-mobile all got their towers upgraded quick without permit holdups, so what's the deal with Sprint?

Really now? Verizon has had problems with permits, and some of their permits in Vegas took 3 years to be approved. AT&T has had similar delays in Vegas. T-Mobile is having delays too. Hmm.... I think you've been suffering from mis-information.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has been discussed ad nauseaum around our forums.  We aren't going to have a new thread on this, especially with how it is being started.  The OP needs to read around the site first.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take the bait incase others see this post.

 

Permits are almost always required in order for tower work to begin. Permits are required for everything above a certain valuation ($5,000/10,000+ etc) and tower work is typically in the thousands of dollars of range for valuations. In addition to valuation, material changes that also costs a certain amount of money and / or fundamentally changes a structure (cell towers / office cell sites / etc) also requires a permit.

 

A permit, depending on area, has certain requirements that must be met in order to be issued. If one proceeds to work without a permit issued you will get fined Nx the cost for a regular one, stop work, and apply for one and then pay for it again.

 

This is a typical building permit application for Sprint AFTER negotiations with the site owner and local entities including zoning. 

 

4XQh7XQ.png

 

Note the time of application to time of issuance. 

 

Some areas take more time such as Berkeley or Hawaii which takes well over 9 - 12 months (year(s) sometimes) but typically 3-6 months is how long it takes for an average urban area to get a permit issued. Others, such as county or rural areas can just be done in a day (walk in) or a few weeks which incidentally are where a lot of upgraded Sprint sites and LTE is available at. Can't have LTE if you can't upgrade the equipment which you cannot do if you don't have permission from the.... you guessed it.. government. 

 

In addition, the manner of just exactly what the applicant wants to do also impacts how fast a permit gets issued. Sprint is completely tearing everything out. All old electrical wiring, coax cables, old cabinets, and old antennas are going to be removed and replaced by new antennas, radio heads, cabinets, hybridflex wiring, and electrical equipment. Due to this multiple government departments are going to need to review the permits and do inspections to make sure you don't burn a tower down or topple a tower due to wind load or improperly engineered designs. 

 

As can see in the permit above you have things like Life Safety, Electrical, Fire, Planning, and Structural reviews. Fail any one of those reviews and you have to resubmit and wait for them to review it again. It is an extremely time consuming to do.

 

On the other hand what ATT, Tmobile, or Verizon does is far simpler. ATT and Verizon nowadays are mostly adding a remote radio head to existing antenna setups to enable AWS or other LTE bands. This does not require much in the way of any engineering as it does not fundamentally alter the setup of a tower. In addition to that they also do not rip out everything on the ground in the leased areas like cabinets and electrical wiring which is another headache. 

 

Tmobile Ericsson is also similar in that all they need to do is replace antennas with new Ericsson AIR's or RRUs. They also go through a semi lengthy review process but the fact that they do not touch ground equipment at all makes their permitting go through far quicker.  Nokia Solutions & Networks may also face similar time frames as Sprint in their vendor regions but the fact that they already have upgraded backhaul in place makes it appear that they're deploying faster than Sprint as Sprint may be upgrading at the same pace but 1/2 to 2/3rds of their sites are still waiting on backhaul from a LEC in order to fire up LTE. 

 

Lots of variables. 

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No specific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...