Jump to content

Is there any hope for CDMA


Recommended Posts

I am pretty sure that CDMA is a newer technology standard than GSM. Didn't it come out in 1995 or 1996? It was considered a more modern network standard that offered higher quality calls, less interference and fewer dropped calls compared to GSM. Verizon and Sprint seem to be committed to keeping CDMA around until around 2020. VoLTE is the future, but Sprint isn't committing all of its time and money to strengthening it's CDMA network with 1xA on 800 mhz and upgrading CDMA on 1900 mhz just to abandon it in a couple of years. 1xA on 800 mhz will be unrivaled for its capacity and range once NV is completed. I think CDMA is pretty safe for quite a while. Besides, most GSM is also actually a variant of CDMA, anyway.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure that CDMA is a newer technology standard than GSM. Didn't it come out in 1995 or 1996? It was considered a more modern network standard that offered higher quality calls, less interference and fewer dropped calls compared to GSM. Verizon and Sprint seem to be committed to keeping CDMA around until around 2020. VoLTE is the future, but Sprint isn't committing all of its time and money to strengthening it's CDMA network with 1xA on 800 mhz and upgrading CDMA on 1900 mhz just to abandon it in a couple of years. 1xA on 800 mhz will be unrivaled for its capacity and range once NV is completed. I think CDMA is pretty safe for quite a while. Besides, most GSM is also actually a variant of CDMA, anyway.

ok. No I know nv is complete but for the majority of the 50 mile radius of my town/towns nv doesn't seem to be good. I mean it's good each tower is live with lte but all my service does is kicks me off lte and I airplane mode back in to it or I'm stuck with .20 3G. I don't pay my bill which is why in still with sprint soon I will be paying my own bill but with seeing sprint service now I just want to switch.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread comes across as "trollish."  The title, in particular, is terrible.

 

If members want to use this thread to ask questions and clear up misconceptions, that is fine.  But staff will be watching and may close the thread if it becomes a problem.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread comes across as "trollish." The title, in particular, is terrible.

 

If members want to use this thread to ask questions and clear up misconceptions, that is fine. But staff will be watching and may close the thread if it becomes a problem.

 

AJ

thanks for the tip u can just close the thread

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...