Jump to content

Anyone using Signal 2?


burnout8488
 Share

Recommended Posts

I've been using the Signal 2 app on my jailbroken 4S to see which towers my phone has been connecting to. For the most part, it sort of works. The tower locations are way off on the map, but after looking at the sponsor maps, you can get an idea of which towers you're connecting to, even if the dots in the app are half a mile off. 

 

I was wondering if anyone else was having this issue with Sprint + Signal 2. Does this app work better for ATT/VZW customers, or is this just a flaw in the app for Sprint customers?

 

It would be cool if there was user access to the database Signal 2 gets its data from - I'd love to help make it more accurate, sort of like Wikipedia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been using the Signal 2 app on my jailbroken 4S to see which towers my phone has been connecting to. For the most part, it sort of works. The tower locations are way off on the map, but after looking at the sponsor maps, you can get an idea of which towers you're connecting to, even if the dots in the app are half a mile off.

 

I was wondering if anyone else was having this issue with Sprint + Signal 2. Does this app work better for ATT/VZW customers, or is this just a flaw in the app for Sprint customers?

 

It would be cool if there was user access to the database Signal 2 gets its data from - I'd love to help make it more accurate, sort of like Wikipedia.

It's how Sprint's cell sites are programmed. It has nothing to do with Signal 2. As far as I know, he doesn't even have a database. The app just stores locations of sites connected to as dots on the map. As for VZW customers, VZW blocks customer access to GPS coordinates for their cell sites.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting... Do the Sprint sites give off very rough coordinates as to their location? Is that the issue with the bad location data?

Very market dependent. In some markets Sprint sites broadcast their exact locations. However in most, the broadcast three different points offset from the base location that correspond with the three sectors of the site. If you find each they are kind of arranged in a triangle around the site. Why some are accurate and others have the offset, we don't know.

 

Sent from my HTC ONE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotcha. Looks like I should have done a bit of research before buying the app. It's still somewhat useful though.

It's useful for what it is. It's Sprint that wasn't useful for the offset in GPS coordinates on their cell sectors.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a couple of Ntelos towers here in the Fredericksburg/Spotyslvania VA area that show that the tower is somewhere off the coast of Greenland. It also shows the same thing when I roam on Verizon at the same spot (I roam on verizon sometimes once I go into my work building or get no signal).  So is it a coordinates that the tower has that all the carriers use or just something that the carriers are doing?

 

It is not Sprint's job to provide "useful" site coordinates to consumers. It is Sprint's job to run its network as it sees fit.

AJ

 

Its Sprint job to provide us a good service to the best of there ability.  Even though providing useful coordinates is not a primary concern. But it would provide us a good service on weather or not there network would be good for us as a customer for work or home.  In doing this would give more respect from me as a customer. Instead of playing hide and go seek with towers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not Sprint's job to provide "useful" site coordinates to consumers. It is Sprint's job to run its network as it sees fit.

 

AJ

 

You are right on that, but still some coordinates for local sites in the Tulare/ Visalia area show that I am in Southern California, and with A-GPS, that could be bad in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I played with Signal back in like 2009 when I had AT&T.  It was fascinating but it just plotted random dots all over the map, put in some bug reports and suggestions and never saw any updates so thought they had abandoned it.  If Signal 2 came out, I'll have to revisit a jailbreak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Cool find! Been there since 2018 according to Cellmapper. The only other time I've seen them leave up a temp site like this for a long period of time was when a nearby site is temporarily inoperable like the one in Red Hook Houses. That doesn't seem to be the case here and it's pretty much a GMO site at this point. My best guess is that T-Mobile wanted to put a site there to fill in coverage but because it's on LGA's grounds getting the actual permission to do so is extremely complex so they worked out a deal with the Port Authority to put up a COW in the meantime.  
    • Would this be a T-Mobile COW outside LGA Terminal A? eNB 49106 seems to line up to its position, plus the arm for the trailer to hook onto a truck says T-Mobile. Here is the NYC streetcar view the image was pulled from.     For all the years I have been monitoring the DAS, I have never gotten -55 or better, even after passing by every antenna in a station that is deep enough to have 0 outside macros reaching in. The SNR is still 20+, so its probably designed that way on purpose.
    • From a few days back: https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/deutsche-telekom-aims-50-t-mobile-ownership-2024 DT Chief Executive Timotheus Hoettgas said buying the majority stake in T-Mobile US was the group's most important strategic project at present, according to Reuters. He said that stake should top 50% much sooner than its previous projection of 2024. Earlier this year, DT paid $2.4 billion to SoftBank Group to increase its stake in T-Mobile US to 48.4%.
    • 5.9GHz finally approved by a court: https://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/court-upholds-fccs-decision-59-ghz.  This should be added to 5GHz wi-fi.  considering wi-fi 7 will be included in the qualcomm x70 and related SOCs, doubtful they will be able to add this now, unless designed to be added later.  5.9GHz will given us a third 160MHz unique carrier iirc, a major improvement.
    • waiting for about 400 with demand > supply, or 95% to look again in some detail.  Until then : https://www.sashajavid.com/FCC_Auction108.php#county_details_table_overlay
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...