Jump to content

Samsung ATIV S


bucdenny

Recommended Posts

Robert, wouldn't the only way to get 52 down be with a 10x10 pcs carrier? Could they be testing something?

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

 

I assume he is using a Triband device and just on B41.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume he is using a Triband device and just on B41.

ATIV S NEO is a single band device, and that is Windows Phone in that screen shot.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATIV S NEO is a single band device, and that is Windows Phone in that screen shot.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

 

I know it's Windows Phone.  I have a Windows Phone product.  But I don't know what his device is capable of.  The speed could be a speed test error.  Or it's a 10MHz carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trying to figure out why it is coming up LTEAdvance on my Samsung Ativ S Neo which is only a band 25 device.

 

Any chance you can get an Engineering screen shot the next time that happens?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's Windows Phone. I have a Windows Phone product. But I don't know what his device is capable of. The speed could be a speed test error. Or it's a 10MHz carrier.

There is always the chance of a 10MHz carrier, but it would take them effort to push firmware to all older devices. I think it might be a fluke.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is always the chance of a 10MHz carrier, but it would take them effort to push firmware to all older devices. I think it might be a fluke.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

May have already happened. Sprint went back and had them all recertified to support 10MHz.

 

Using Nexus 5 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully?  Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot.  It is not a 52 Mbps speed test.  It reflects data usage:  1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully? Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot. It is not a 52 Mbps speed test. It reflects data usage: 1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

That is the way the app is reading what type of signal I'm getting, it isn't doing any download or uploads.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully? Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot. It is not a 52 Mbps speed test. It reflects data usage: 1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

I completely missed that. Good catch.

 

Using Nexus 5 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully? Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot. It is not a 52 Mbps speed test. It reflects data usage: 1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

I missed that too. Thanks AJ.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Someone told me a couple years ago, that there were problems getting certain modems to aggregate overlapping spectrum even if the overlapping parts were actually blanked. So I think there might be firmware issues that need to be resolved first, which T-Mobile might not consider worth the effort for 4MHz at this time.
    • Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
    • No? RCS on Google messages works great for me, messages between anyone with RCS enabled go through with no problems. Don't remember the last time I had an issue. I only have issues with people on iPhones on different carriers from T-Mobile.
    • Has anyone experienced a ridiculous amount of difficulty with Google messages with RCS enabled?  It has been a train wreck for me for the past year so I now use WhatsApp.  That works very well for all of us.... Android and iOS.  
    • Probably not worth the fiddling given that that's a few percent of the band. Also, if they really wanted to push my assumption is there are still guard bands in play for the n41 carriers so they could fit two "100 MHz" carriers into 194 MHz anyway. Looks like minimum guard band is less than 1 MHz and a 100 MHz channel is only 273 30 KHz resource blocks, which is a bit over 80 MHz total, so if they really wanted to pull another 5% or so capacity out they could.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...