Jump to content

Conversation about Sprint Moving to UMTS


Recommended Posts

 

Canada is more or less a mirror of the US in spectrum policy. Add the protectionism of their government and good old-fashioned greed, throw them together, and voila, Robelus. I know one of the entrants there, Moblicity, went into creditor protection (Candadian C11) and sold off to Telus. WIND isn't doing great either.

 

 

Canada has crazy-strict foreign ownership rules, right?

 

I bet there's lots of foreigners who'd love to buy WND, Moblicity, and Public and make some nice dough in the worlds highest-priced market.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2009/08/11/canada-cellphone-rates-expensive-oecd.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. If the only other option for the high end engineers is C7 liquidation, I'm betting even the French would accept a deal when it comes to AlLu finding a buyer.

 

2. Canada had the foreign investment rules which lifted a bit, but it's still a lot of scrutiny to put up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, it would be a good move to give it business, if it wasn't already so close to folding. It was in better shape when Sprint negotiated the agreement for Network Vision, but that is no longer the case. As for the feature set, Alcatel-Lucent DBSes lag behind Ericsson and Samsung in terms of 3GPP features supported in Release 9 (not even counting Release 10, since only one of the three vendors actually has a substantial amount of Release 10 features implemented).

 

 

If ALU is good enough for Verizon's small cells, it should be good enough for Sprint

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-taps-alcatel-lucent-ericsson-lte-small-cells/2013-05-21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If ALU is good enough for Verizon's small cells, it should be good enough for Sprint

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-taps-alcatel-lucent-ericsson-lte-small-cells/2013-05-21

What isn't mentioned is that Verizon's choice of vendors was pre-selected back when they began the LTE deployment three years ago. They were quietly talking about it at Mobile World Congress, as well. Last year was when Verizon became a loud proponent of small cells, and noted that it worked with Ericsson and ALU since mid-2011 on the HetNet stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the same, I think the rumors of Alcatel-Lucent's demise are a bit exaggerated or at least premature.

 

I feel it's premature because ALU was the first to produce small cells for Sprint PCS CDMA/EVDO/LTE.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with AlLu isn't engineering wise. It's that they lose money hand over fist. Same problem Lucent had. NSN was able to turn around in a short time by bringing focus to their business and focusing on mobile broadband.

 

Maybe AlLu should try the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • These creditors are going to get screwed one way or another. I see no exit for them that will be painless. Rule # 1 - Never get in bed with Charlie.
    • https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/10/dish-creditors-revolt-over-directv-merger-try-to-block-loss-making-deal/ This deal could be dead before it starts.
    • I don't disagree entirely but a lot of the really rural coverage (like where I grew up) still has little or no competition.  There is a lot of overlap but there are also a number of unique sites that will help things. But also, the fact is that a lot of the rural T-Mobile coverage is still "map filler" coverage that doesn't actually provide reliable service.  This will help. https://imgur.com/a/LRWF3FO Using where I grew up as an example, magenta is T-Mobile, blue is US Cellular, and gold are unique sites Shentel planned but didn't get a chance to construct before the buyout derailed things. EDIT: And even a number of the T-Mobile sites shown here are Shentel conversions.  The only reason for the site NW of Keysville is that Shentel built that one before the buyout pause.  The site southwest of Meherrin wasn't a Shentel conversion, although Shentel did plan to build there, but rather was added to fill a gap along US-360 when the Shentel conversions were taking place.  Three of the five sites in Farmville proper are Shentel conversions also, as is the one north of town just barely on the map. - Trip
    • It feels really late for Tmo to buying USC now. They overbuilt so much of their area.  It's not a bad move. But it would have provided much more unique coverage earlier and would have captured more USC customers who have since churned. Probably a lot churned to Tmo as they have overbuilt them.  Robert
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...