Jump to content

Potential Sprint rural buildout by 2016


Recommended Posts

Did you try using LTE only mode. Maybe it's not letting devices authenticate since there's no CSFB fallback.

Or data centric mode. Could also be a question of backhaul.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

Still cannot authenticate to the PCS G Block LTE Carrier on B25 here in Rapid City, SD. Not on a Sprint SIM it Google Fi SIM.

 

It is still broadcasting on PLMN ID 311 530 only. I don't know if Sprint will push an update to allow that PLMNID or if they will soon start broadcasting Sprint's 310 120 ID also. Or if Sprint customers will never be allowed to use it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Provide me an address of this site, i'll ask what they up to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you try using LTE only mode. Maybe it's not letting devices authenticate since there's no CSFB fallback.

Yeah, I was in LTE Only mode. Otherwise I don't see it at all.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provide me an address of this site, i'll ask what they up to.

There are three in Rapid City doing the same thing. This specific one is:

 

- 3850 Tower Road, Rapid City, SD 57701

 

The other two are:

 

- 2727 N. Plaza Drive, Rapid City, SD 57702

- 909 St. Joseph St., Rapid City, SD 57701

 

All three of these are Golden West Telecommunications sites broadcasting on Sprint's PCS G Block channels.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another possible repeat, but good verification (Grand Forks, ND):

 

Map

https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=1718171375&attachmentKey=19885565&attachmentInd=applAttach

 

paperwork:

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applMain.jsp?applID=9525071

 

I have 173 of these, skipping the ones I figure we know or not interested in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yes, those all are Required Notification filings -- the standard type of FCC filing licensees use to indicate satisfaction of certain construction requirement benchmarks.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So that you do not knock yourself out with too much searching, Sprint has filed these Required Notifications for all of its PCS G block BEAs across the country.  Not just the previously unconstructed, largely rural BEAs.  The filings were due for all BEAs.  You can view the filings for the likes of New York and Los Angeles, too.

 

But good find.  I did not think to look this week at pending applications for the PCS G block licenses -- even though I created this thread almost three years ago.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that you do not knock yourself out with too much searching, Sprint has filed these Required Notifications for all of its PCS G block BEAs across the country.  Not just the previously unconstructed, largely rural BEAs.  The filings were due for all BEAs.  You can view the filings for the likes of New York and Los Angeles, too.

 

But good find.  I did not think to look this week at pending applications for the PCS G block licenses -- even though I created this thread almost three years ago.

 

AJ

 

These were all filed on March 9th.  I have read just a few and they indicate these are for all LTE at greater than -119.8 RSRP.  They provide a wealth of information for sparsely covered markets.  Maps for markets such as Columbus are of quite limited use.  Any idea as to what stage of construction these sites would need to met for the substantial service requirement?

 

( I hope to make it through all 173 filings tonight, posting those that I feel are relevant.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These were all filed on March 9th.  I have read just a few and they indicate these are for all LTE at greater than -119.8 RSRP.  They provide a wealth of information for sparsely covered markets.  Maps for markets such as Columbus are of quite limited use.  Any idea as to what stage of construction these sites would need to met for the substantial service requirement?

 

( I hope to make it through all 173 filings tonight, posting those that I feel are relevant.)

 

Yes, you are correct.  Sprint filed all of them as a batch.  The posting date was yesterday, but they may not have appeared in the FCC ULS until today.

 

And as I already commented to an on the road Robert, Sprint is using a -119.8 dBm RSRP figure of merit to define the extent of coverage footprint.  It is not conservative, but it is about what we have long experienced with the 5 MHz FDD carrier -- that -120 dBm RSRP is more or less the bottom limit.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Done.  I did not see the following BEAs: Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Gulf of Mexico, thus all are accounted.  

 

All say required notification received (3/9) then offlined for expired license review (3/10).  There is no date on the attachments.

 

the following search was used:

 

Specified Search Radio Service Code=CW, CY
Applicant City=reston
Applicant State=Virginia
Receipt Date=02/25/2016 to 3/10/2016

 

from here: http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/searchAdvanced.jsp

 

I use City and State to get all of the Sprint subsidiaries.  Occasionally I pickup someone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excuse the newbie question but do these filings mean that Sprint is going to start a LTE build out in these areas (shown map in link)pending FCC approval? Because it would be nice if Sprint had LTE service extending all the way from Pueblo down through Trinidad into Northern New Mexico Raton area!? But not sure if that's what these mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...