Jump to content

lte coverage question


Recommended Posts

Why does lte coverage follow the path of a street,and seem to skip streets?

 

Each tower is designed to address a specific need. Some towers are designed to shoot down a stretch of road. Some are designed for high capacity etc. As far as follow the street I mean each tower only has a certain coverage area. The street that's covered could be the street with the tower. And other streets may be out of range. Not sure how far the build out is in your area but LTE coverage will most likely mimic the current 3G coverage when its complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does lte coverage follow the path of a street,and seem to skip streets?

 

Are you refereing to how it looks using Sensorly or similar app?

If so; understand that this is shown based on where each of the individuals running tests with their devices travels. As we mostly travel using roads you will see the data shown as such.

When a street seems as skipped it just means none of our members or the user of the specific app has not gone on that street.

Remember; radio waves propagate based on the angle each of the sectors is configured to transmit. Radio signals do not nescesarily dicriminate on going to street X and Street Z and skipping Street Y.

Hope this makes a bit more sense.

 

@l3x

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrian has alot to do with it also. I've notice that I can get 4G and then go into a small dip in the road and lose the 4G signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also have a question. Driving through towns that have just 3G, and then entering places that have LTE coverage, I was wondering how long does it take for 3G to switch over to LTE, while using CDMA/LTE/EVDO network mode? There are a few locations outside the town I live in that LTE is up and running, and when stopping at a traffic light in these LTE areas, it seems like it takes a couple of minutes for LTE to appear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does lte coverage follow the path of a street,and seem to skip streets?

 

It sounds like you are looking at Sensorly. That's a user generated coverage map. AMejia explained that pretty well.

 

For a better idea of a rough coverage area, use the Sprint maps. But keep in mind those tend to be over exaggerated just a bit.

 

I also have a question. Driving through towns that have just 3G, and then entering places that have LTE coverage, I was wondering how long does it take for 3G to switch over to LTE, while using CDMA/LTE/EVDO network mode? There are a few locations outside the town I live in that LTE is up and running, and when stopping at a traffic light in these LTE areas, it seems like it takes a couple of minutes for LTE to appear.

 

It depends on which phone you have, and where it is in it's scan cycles. Each phone scans for LTE at a different interval, from between 5 and 15 minutes. Or longer if you haven't been in an LTE coverage area for some time. So if you are at the end of the cycle, it will only take a few moments, but if you are at the beginning, it can take up to 15 minutes. To force your phone to connect, just cycle airplane mode which resets the radios, and forces an LTE scan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on which phone you have, and where it is in it's scan cycles. Each phone scans for LTE at a different interval, from between 5 and 15 minutes. Or longer if you haven't been in an LTE coverage area for some time. So if you are at the end of the cycle, it will only take a few moments, but if you are at the beginning, it can take up to 15 minutes. To force your phone to connect, just cycle airplane mode which resets the radios, and forces an LTE scan.

 

The LTE scan timer on the LG Optimus G is 1800 seconds (30 minutes) by default. But the user can change it.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. I wasn't sure what was going on not connecting right away. The info makes a whole lot of sense, and is very helpful! Thanks again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Crunching the numbers a bit more, covering the full MSA would result in slightly under 80% population coverage. But they'd have to deploy on essentially every micro/macro cell in the area.   Yeah, I'm not gonna pretend like I know how either negotiations with squatters or Auction 108 will pan out. That said, I can't see 3.45GHz being *that* valuable to squatters considering the strict buildout requirements.  Another interesting thought I had was a possible spectrum trade with Dish. Dish is still leasing 600MHz to T-Mobile in quite a few metro areas, and I'm sure T-Mobile is looking ahead to what their lowband spectrum situation will be once those leases expire. If T-Mobile is truly going to rely on n71+n41 CA as much as they say they will, it sure would be nice to be working with more than 5MHz-10MHz of n71 uplink capacity. Don't go quoting me on that, though, total (pipedream) speculation haha.
    • Great job on your analysis of small cells versus the 3.45GHZ and the population coverage requirements. I wonder if the fcc is stalling because they may address the key limitation of of 2.5: the convoluted frequencies. Not sure how they would get there, but it would be better public policy if you could actually use a single license in current times, ie 5, 10 or 20MHz. Of course they could also go in more of a nonprofit or small business direction. But most likely they will keep it as planned given how messy the transition would be. In many/most metro areas BRS/EBS is fully licensed. Would be nice if they put pressure on the squatters.
    • I didn't actually look at the buildout requirements before making that comment - they're definitely going to have to deploy on macro sites if they want to hit the buildout requirements. PEA001 has a population of 25,237,061, of which they will have to hit 45% in 4 years (11,356,677) and 80% in 8 years (20,189,649). If they were to cover the entirely, all five boroughs, of NYC using only small cells (something I'd say is impossible considering their current small cell density), they'd only be covering 32% of the population in the PEA. And this is with spectrum that only adds 300Mb/s per sector and will likely have only 50% the range of their current n41 equipment. Doesn't really seem worth it to me. I'm of the opinion that they're looking to hedge their bets in further EBS/BRS acquisition. 
    • These strand mounts also are deployed with Band 46 (LAA), in my experience. I have yet to encounter a strand mount with exclusively 2/66. 
    • Bought a esim "sim" card a few weeks ago that operates in all of my more current phones according to its app. It arrived a couple of weeks early from Berlin.  Now if my MVNOs would get moving and support more than iPhones and rarely Pixels so I can test this thing. https://esim.me The only item really troubling so far is reviews in google play store keep getting deleted, even 5 star ones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...