Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Toledo Market (Toledo, Bowling Green, Findlay, Lima, Port Clition)


keelerman8042

Recommended Posts

Hrm after living with the LTE Deployment for a while now....how should i say this..... "its not great?"

 

there are alot of people who say that 1900MHz LTE will not propagate as well as 3G. well i can say for sure that is a fact. other lima guys have probably experienced this as well.

 

 

For instance, in a parking lot of our local walmart i can easily get a -80 dBm signal and get 20Mbps down. step inside and it goes "nope" instant -120 dBm and your getting about 4Mbps down. this is within a mile of a tower.

 

 

Warning for people who do NOT live in lima.

This is for the LIMA AREA! do not confuse this with your area if you are getting crappy signal and don't live in the lima area!

 

We definitely do not have enough towers to service our area for 1900MHz Lte a few more in key spots (like 2 or 3 more) would fix everything perfectly. That or Lte on 800MHz whenever canada decides we can actually have it as with the current cell spacing LTE on 800MHz would spread the love to all black holes around lima.

I don't know what you expect of LTE. I have AT&T B17 (700 MHz). There is a site next to a Walmart here in my city. Outside, I get a -82dBm RSRP on AT&T B17. I go inside Walmart. It drops to -115dBm RSRP. It's not as if there is some magical physics defying low frequency spectrum.

 

Low frequencies do help. But the big issue here is LTE has a fragile airlink. Going inside buildings is highly variable. So many different construction types.

 

Big box stores can be the worst with metal roof trusses, metal roof decks and lots of roof insulation. Especially in Northern climates. Match that with CMU, stucco or concrete tilt up walls, and that's the reason why LTE signals drop 30dBm or more going indoors. It's amazing they don't drop completely.

 

If you get a B25 signal inside a big box store at all, count it a victory. 700/800 MHz may give you a few more dB's. But it's not going to be anywhere near the outside signal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what you expect of LTE. I have AT&T B17 (700 MHz). There is a site next to a Walmart here in my city. Outside, I get a -82dBm RSRP on AT&T B17. I go inside Walmart. It drops to -115dBm RSRP. It's not as if there is some magical physics defying low frequency spectrum.

 

Low frequencies do help. But the big issue here is LTE has a fragile airlink. Going inside buildings is highly variable. So many different construction types.

 

Big box stores can be the worst with metal roof trusses, metal roof decks and lots of roof insulation. Especially in Northern climates. Match that with CMU, stucco or concrete tilt up walls, and that's the reason why LTE signals drop 30dBm or more going indoors. It's amazing they don't drop completely.

 

If you get a B25 signal inside a big box store at all, count it a victory. 700/800 MHz may give you a few more dB's. But it's not going to be anywhere near the outside signal.

Yep thats why i stated that it seems to be mostly buildings with metal roofs. i should add that older buildings with thicker concreet or brick walls dont help either.

 

But i was doing some driving when the first tower went live in lima and i was easily able to hold onto the signal way way into the country where EVDO would bounce off 3 other towers i held onto the same LTE signal from the middle of lima.

 

For now they probably have the tilt on the antennas set for maximum area coverage rather than building penetration. if anything changes i will of course update this thread but supposedly the 2 towers on the eastern side of lima are not broadcasting yet so i dont think they will mess with the antennas until the 2 other towers are up.

 

if my post sounded a bit fussy its not really what i was going for sprint did what it could with what it had to work with and they cant do anymore for now. i cant help that but i can appreciate that sprint even thought to upgrade lima in the first place.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe it has something to do with the triband phones as i stated early i just switched from my s4 to an s5 and I'll be honest here the lte signal is terrible unless I'm within 50 yards of a tower, i was connected to band 41 out in rossford for a minute and was great signal next to the tower drove down road a bit -115db. In areas where i know lte used to be good on s4 im on 3g. I actually just use my phone for cdma only now because the connection for my lte is awful again this isnt a rant. But i am agreeing with other guys post on lte strength i understand inside a building but this is outside also, the s4 ran on 1900 lte my s5 connected according to signal check to 2500 lte with bad signal then jumped back to 1900 full signal a couple yards down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just encoured a pretty good b41 tower.

 

 

Speedtest Result in Holland

My Speedtest result in Holland for Sprint (LTE) : 70.90 Mb/s (download) & 12.22 Mb/s (upload) via #sensorly

419055-SCHWING.jpg

 

 

But in all honesty probs wont happen in lima lol. the few towers i looked at only have a single antenna up for sprint in each sectory. that is if i think i know what i am looking at. i mean verizon is doing like 4 panels per sector AT&T also uses more than 1 panel so it has to be sprint right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well after 1 year 5 months and 3 days, my tower is LTE accepted. Tower located near downtown Sylvania.... Happy dance

Sweet! That should be a big improvement.

 

As fall has turned to winter, I have seen quite a few improvements signal and speed-wise. IDK if that's optimizing on Sprint's part or just the leaves being gone or something crazy like that?

 

Now they just need to LTE accept the one near Sylvania and Corey and I'll be all set!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet! That should be a big improvement.

 

As fall has turned to winter, I have seen quite a few improvements signal and speed-wise. IDK if that's optimizing on Sprint's part or just the leaves being gone or something crazy like that?

 

Now they just need to LTE accept the one near Sylvania and Corey and I'll be all set!

 

I've noticed some range increase in the towers around Point Place.  I'm afraid it may be the lack of leaves as well :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Not sure if this is the right place to bring this up, but anyone else have audio issues on incoming calls?  It's been happening to me more and more lately and I don't know if it's the upgrades that have been going on in Toledo or some other reason. 

 

Just realized I need to renew my sponsorship as well, better get on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is the right place to bring this up, but anyone else have audio issues on incoming calls? It's been happening to me more and more lately and I don't know if it's the upgrades that have been going on in Toledo or some other reason.

 

Just realized I need to renew my sponsorship as well, better get on that.

I myself havnt noticed anything of late. There shouldn't be any major issues with tower upgrades as there is the tower over on corey and 475 is the only one left that does not have LTE. Wishfull thinking is they are working on 800. Maybe by summer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I myself havnt noticed anything of late. There shouldn't be any major issues with tower upgrades as there is the tower over on corey and 475 is the only one left that does not have LTE. Wishfull thinking is they are working on 800. Maybe by summer.

Nope. Late 2h 2015 is still the time frame.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I myself havnt noticed anything of late. There shouldn't be any major issues with tower upgrades as there is the tower over on corey and 475 is the only one left that does not have LTE. Wishfull thinking is they are working on 800. Maybe by summer.

Thanks. Sprint is now telling me it seems to be a Buckeye Telesystem issue... hopefully that is the caseand hopefully it gets fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Was on my way home from work, and I had looked down at my phone and it was connected to LTE. I was in utter surprise! I haven't been keeping up with updates specially on sprints network page. It's nice to at least see Leipsic getting 4g! And it's only about 10 mins away from me did a speed test with only two bars and was pretty happy with the results!

image.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Random article i found showing sommore rollouts on Feb 19th (its the 18th now)

 

http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/02/16/sprint-rolling-lte-25-new-markets-february-19th/

 

 

I have no idea if the last two towers in lima are up yet. havent been around them parts lately with work being up north. i wish the one guy who lived on the south side of lima would post on here with an updated. =/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I just had to go drive around central/douglas and monroe/douglas when I saw a green tower there in the "NV Sites complete Map" thread. I did not connect to 800 :(

Bummer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just had to go drive around central/douglas and monroe/douglas when I saw a green tower there in the "NV Sites complete Map" thread. I did not connect to 800 :(

If I don't get 1x800/b26 in Granville/Newark/Heath, then u don't get it either!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never, no 1x800 or b26 besides towers on the south side.... Really stinks bc site spacing is poor and 3g and lte is unusable inside most restaurants & buildings.

I was just wondering once they are complete on the map (3g/800/4g---like newark/heath) how long before the sites go live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...