Jump to content

Where would Nextel be today if they didn't merge with Sprint?


Recommended Posts

Remember the old Sprint/Nextel “hybrid” phones? I had service everywhere with that thing!

 

Sent via Forum Runner on my jailbroken iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

 

They were pretty nice. They should have pushed them even harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember the old Sprint/Nextel “hybrid” phones? I had service everywhere with that thing!

 

...but not everywhere that Sprint had native + roaming coverage, as none of PowerSource handsets ever supported CDMA1X 850 roaming. I believe the reason for the omission was concern over intermodulation between iDEN 800 and CDMA1X 850 transmitters. Furthermore, the ic902 was the only PowerSource handset to support EV-DO; the others were all limited to 1X.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still have my ic803 somewhere.. Would I be able to use it as a backup phone?[/Quote]

 

Edit: Nevermind, stupid question! lol

And it could have possibly been

an ic502.

 

Sent via Forum Runner on my jailbroken iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

Edited by gopher_otis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DIdn't sprint pay something like 38 Billion for nextel? That would have been enough to buy every license for both the AWS and 700mhz auctions which brought in a total 33 billion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DIdn't sprint pay something like 38 Billion for nextel? That would have been enough to buy every license for both the AWS and 700mhz auctions which brought in a total 33 billion

 

I believe Sprint paid 36 billion for Nextel. Keep in mind that the spectrum is done through auctions and if Sprint participated in them, they would not be able to buy up every license for both AWS and 700 Mhz. Im sure Verizon and AT&T would have loved to have done that and use their financial muscle to choke the competition of spectrum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I understand that Sprint would not have gotten all of the spectrum Tmobile did get a substantial chunk of the AWS. Had sprint participated Im sure it would have gone for more but considering how much they paid for Nextel they likely would have been better off and had more spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Sprint paid 36 billion for Nextel. Keep in mind that the spectrum is done through auctions and if Sprint participated in them, they would not be able to buy up every license for both AWS and 700 Mhz. Im sure Verizon and AT&T would have loved to have done that and use their financial muscle to choke the competition of spectrum.

 

Well, they actually merged with them, but it's kind of funny money. It's not funny money to Sprint shareholders who lost their shirt. Spectrum money is real money that has to come out of cash or you have to borrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Sprint paid 36 billion for Nextel. Keep in mind that the spectrum is done through auctions and if Sprint participated in them, they would not be able to buy up every license for both AWS and 700 Mhz. Im sure Verizon and AT&T would have loved to have done that and use their financial muscle to choke the competition of spectrum.

 

Not really, sprint didn't write a check for Nextel - they "merged".

 

Obviously more complicated then that, something we could spend hours talking about... but I don't want people thinking Sprint just had 36 billion they could have used for something else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really, sprint didn't write a check for Nextel - they "merged".

 

Obviously more complicated then that, something we could spend hours talking about... but I don't want people thinking Sprint just had 36 billion they could have used for something else.

 

And that merger is mainly the reason they've posting losses non-stop for 5 years. They've basically been writing it off since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that merger is mainly the reason they've posting losses non-stop for 5 years. They've basically been writing it off since then.

 

The have written of 31billion of the merger off and paid approx 2.8 Billion in cash

 

Edited million to Billion

Edited by jegillis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only true impact has been a steady reduction in the overall value of the combined entity and the simultaneous dilution of shareholder value. The only money thats gone up in smoke is the affiliate buyouts and payments for debt gained.

 

The idea that sprint would have survived alone is naive. While an alltel merger would have helped spectrum in some places, it would not have bolstered sprints heavyweight status the way that nextel did. Sprint would have needed to be acquired or buy again.... and nextel would have been another carrier's target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Necropost, coming up!

 

IMO Sprint + Alltel would've been better than Sprint + Nextel.

 

Yes, Sprint got a 10MHz nationwide block of near-PCS, plus 14MHz of near-nationwide SMR, plus a big block of BRS spectrum (still waiting to see how that stuff gets used...135 million folks covered by a network that will never expand is pitiful for a national carrier).

 

However with Alltel Sprint would have gotten 25MHz of cellular in many areas, some PCS in others, and a customer base that could be very, very easily integrated into their own. Sprint would also have the upper hand on the roaming front (remember, Alltel and Sprint had a reciprocal roaming agreement...including 3G data...when Alltel was independent...Verizon has to keep the agreement up for another few years), since they would have service (via ex-Alltel) where other companies (even Verizon) didn't. Oh, and 12-plus-million customers, none of whom would whine when transitioned to Sprint's network (not that they'd notice the difference, since both networks roamed on each other).

 

And when the time to go 4G came around, Sprint could just deploy on CLR and PCS...no SMR funny business (though their economies of scale mean that SMR LTE phones will exist anyway), adding (and then widening) LTE carriers as they retired CDMA (it's easy to fit a 5x5 LTE carrier into 25MHz in the A or B cellular band).

 

I fully expected Sprint to buy Alltel, back even before the private equity buyout (and I wasn't following the news closely). I was sad when Verizon locked it down...they killed Alltel's unlimited EvDO data cards (yes, they existed, and people used them for home broadband connections when nothing else was available) pretty darned quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Sprint got a 10MHz nationwide block of near-PCS, plus 14MHz of near-nationwide SMR, plus a big block of BRS spectrum (still waiting to see how that stuff gets used...135 million folks covered by a network that will never expand is pitiful for a national carrier).

 

If Sprint never bought Nextel to receive BRS spectrum, do you think Sprint would have ever partnered up with Clearwire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint never bought Nextel to receive BRS spectrum, do you think Sprint would have ever partnered up with Clearwire?

 

Can't speculate, since I'm not sure whether Sprint had a buildout requirement for its BRS spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint never bought Nextel to receive BRS spectrum, do you think Sprint would have ever partnered up with Clearwire?

 

Sprint already had 50Mhz of BRS spectrum of their own through their illfated wireless cable TV venture. They later used it for wireless internet. Nextel acquired theirs through MCI Worldcom. The buildout requirement came when they merged with Nextel. I don't think that Sprint would have partnered with Clearwire absent the Nextel merger since they did not have a buildout requirement for their BRS spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Necropost, coming up!

 

IMO Sprint + Alltel would've been better than Sprint + Nextel.

 

Yes, Sprint got a 10MHz nationwide block of near-PCS, plus 14MHz of near-nationwide SMR, plus a big block of BRS spectrum (still waiting to see how that stuff gets used...135 million folks covered by a network that will never expand is pitiful for a national carrier).

 

However with Alltel Sprint would have gotten 25MHz of cellular in many areas, some PCS in others, and a customer base that could be very, very easily integrated into their own. Sprint would also have the upper hand on the roaming front (remember, Alltel and Sprint had a reciprocal roaming agreement...including 3G data...when Alltel was independent...Verizon has to keep the agreement up for another few years), since they would have service (via ex-Alltel) where other companies (even Verizon) didn't. Oh, and 12-plus-million customers, none of whom would whine when transitioned to Sprint's network (not that they'd notice the difference, since both networks roamed on each other).

 

And when the time to go 4G came around, Sprint could just deploy on CLR and PCS...no SMR funny business (though their economies of scale mean that SMR LTE phones will exist anyway), adding (and then widening) LTE carriers as they retired CDMA (it's easy to fit a 5x5 LTE carrier into 25MHz in the A or B cellular band).

 

I fully expected Sprint to buy Alltel, back even before the private equity buyout (and I wasn't following the news closely). I was sad when Verizon locked it down...they killed Alltel's unlimited EvDO data cards (yes, they existed, and people used them for home broadband connections when nothing else was available) pretty darned quickly.

 

Just remember that they would not have had CLR in the majority of their metro areas. They would have had to bid in the 700MHz auction. In my opinion, they would have been much better off without Nextel. They would have followed a steady, natural migration path without the distraction of the Nextel merger and rebanding and the Clearwire debacle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...