Jump to content

Sprint has 3 LTE MVNOs


EXLINE

Recommended Posts

I was just sitting here bored at work when i ran across this. Sprint I guess has 3 MVNOs that use there LTE network. The first one I noticed which is a little more well known that a few sites reported on is "Ting". The second and the one with the best plan pricing is "Voyager Mobile". The third one is "Ring Plus, Inc". This just blew my mind for some reason but I should of known after how they did it with WiMax. I believe this would make the first LTE MVNOs in the U.S. so far. Just had to share this with ya'll, I wonder if they would activate any Sprint phone and would you have to root because the APN setting may be different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to pretend I'm an ostrich with my head in the sand but , isn't this where we kinda got started with mvno's ? It's because we were looking for cash to upgrade and do more with the network but were not there yet right people ?

 

mobile with Evo Lte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to pretend I'm an ostrich with my head in the sand but , isn't this where we kinda got started with mvno's ? It's because we were looking for cash to upgrade and do more with the network but were not there yet right people ? mobile with Evo Lte

 

Since when is more customers a bad thing? Maybe Verizon or ATT should boot 30 million of their customers. :)

 

Seriously though, these are small potatoes... Ting is the largest, and they are tiny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those Voyager Mobile handsets are expensive. I guess it helps subsidize those monthly rates.

Might give it a try once tri-band LTE handsets start coming out.

Looks like your choice is to get a discount on the phone and pay a higher monthly fee, or pay full price for the phone and get a cheaper monthly rate.

Isn't that what they do in the U.K.? Pay top dollar for phone but just pop in sim card?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...