Jump to content

Spray-On Antenna Can Turn Anything Into a Cellphone Signal Booster


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

I almost choked on my Diet Pepsi when I saw this link on Twitter posted by RootMetrics...

 

Struggling with cell phone service? Perhaps a spray-on antenna will do the trick. http://mashable.com/2012/02/16/spray-on-antenna/

 

Maybe those of you looking for a WiMax booster can use this??? Follow the link in the quote above and read about the spray-on antenna. Comment below!

 

:jester:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell, why is Sprint wasting all this money on Network Vision? No wonder they're having financial difficulties! All they have to do is send their wireless subscribers a couple cans of this stuff and call it day!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly, the owner of RootMetrics called in to troubleshoot one of the Sprint phones he uses for data gathering. Nice guy. I am not so sure that his data collection method is accurate. He had people drive around running an android app on a phone from each carrier. Too many vaiables in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly' date=' the owner of RootMetrics called in to troubleshoot one of the Sprint phones he uses for data gathering. Nice guy. I am not so sure that his data collection method is accurate. He had people drive around running an android app on a phone from each carrier. Too many vaiables in my opinion.[/quote']

 

I talk with Kevin at RootMetrics occasionally. He's a good guy. I once posted a video of how they do their collection. It was pretty interesting. I'm a major RootMetrics contributor. IMHO, I believe its pretty accurate. And its way more accurate than the coverage maps that wireless carriers put out there.

 

If you go and look at all the Sprint coverage at RootMetrics site in Albuquerque, Santa Fe, Los Alamos areas, those are nearly all my submissions.

 

S4GRU is now mobile...posted via Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I've pumped many, many hours and many many miles of Rootmetrics data collection into the system, and I can vouch for the fact that what shows on their maps matches my Real World™ experience - at least in my vicinity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talk with Kevin at RootMetrics occasionally. He's a good guy. I once posted a video of how they do their collection. It was pretty interesting. I'm a major RootMetrics contributor. IMHO, I believe its pretty accurate. And its way more accurate than the coverage maps that wireless carriers put out there.

 

If you go and look at all the Sprint coverage at RootMetrics site in Albuquerque, Santa Fe, Los Alamos areas, those are nearly all my submissions.

 

S4GRU is now mobile...posted via Forum Runner

 

Do they let you get your hands on a local copy of the logged data that is uploaded to the mothership? If so, is it useful? Does RootMetrics support LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...