Jump to content

My rambling's and things I find...


mhammett

Recommended Posts

Looks pretty innocuous. My city has thousands of wooden poles, most taller and more visibly annoying. The issue that a lot of cities will have is they have to prohibit all utility companies equally from having wooden utility poles. And many cities do indeed have buried utility requirements. But this is more often an issue in Western suburban communities, that are relatively new. Older cities, especially on the East Coast, have really old above ground utility infrastructure. Just like these wooden poles.

 

And I would recommend that Sprint and their partners, like Mobilitie, work out deals to colocate on existing utility poles and easements. If they can jump on many utility franchise agreements with cities, they may be able to skip the planning/approval and possibly even building permit requirements.

This. Charlotte, along with the handful of cities I've visited on this side of the country, use utility poles for everything outside of new (i.e. less than 25 years old) strictly residential neighborhoods. Throw in anything commercial and you're surrounded by wooden utility poles or in some cases metal light poles. So here at least they already have poles pretty much anywhere you'd want a small cell. Not sure about weight load on the existing poles, but at least there shouldn't be any irrational objection from the municipalities for new ones.

 

For pole-less neighborhoods, the only ones here would be better served by a well-tuned macro than a network of small cells.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ericsson did a few of those in the New Orleans area back in 2014. Short poles with omni "cans" at the top. They only ever lit them up as SISO 3G though, and they used the old RRUS 11 as opposed to the 31. I'm hoping they canned that project in favor of Nokia small cells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 10 months later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Is there a map of the MSCs and cores?

I know one can get a list of MSCs from the maps and one can then do some research to actually find them.

I know there's a core in Chicago and IIRC, it's either in Chicago proper or Bridgeview, but that's from speculation based on prior testing work by Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a map of the MSCs and cores?

 

I know one can get a list of MSCs from the maps and one can then do some research to actually find them.

 

I know there's a core in Chicago and IIRC, it's either in Chicago proper or Bridgeview, but that's from speculation based on prior testing work by Sprint.

 

I was asked by a source not to do that for security purposes.  Yes, even though the information exists for them to gather it themselves.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've been gathering information about MSCs and cores in my area, largely through carrier maps, building lists, etc. Most have registered switches with CLLIs, but often just searching that address will tell you what company has that facility.Some information is from property records, some from EPA records for generator fuel storage, some probably from old phone records, etc.

It is geographically limited and by no means guaranteed to be complete within that.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=15ZBWRVe5hVKfDLjsF3hbRCIj7sQ&usp=sharing


Trying to get into the mobile backhaul game, so figuring out where to go. If anyone has leads on doing business with the carriers, let me know.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, a new tactic might have worked. A Tweet to Guenther got me in touch with Sprint's VP, Network Engineering and Deployment. Hopefully I can get some traction there.

Has Sprint changed their backhaul capacity at all? I believe it was last rumored that it was 1 gig to the tower. I've heard in some areas, some cell companies want an entire sheath of dark fiber. Post in a Premier thread if it's too sensitive for public consumption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...