dkyeager

None of us are Google customers either. We are the product (our data). Advertisers are Google's customers.

Does qualcomm, mediatech, etc maintain developer bug lists?

Comcast offers multi gigabit service. Easily has worst customer support. Hangups on polite customers. Technically Charter would be an easier target.

I could be the guilty party. I had a oneplus nord n200 5g showing as DE2117 with oem firmware to signalcheck.net on Oxygen 12 rooted as having n25. NSG agreed, reporting n25 as 15x15 with no way for me to lock band without paying $$$$ or getting a special blessing to do 5g band locking. Now in the process of converting this to Oxygen 11 which in theory will allow me to lock bands with an engineering function thus could further validate with a speed test. Should have checked with cellmapper as well. Have a DE2118 (oneplus nord n200 5g) with T-Mobile firmware also reporting n25 on oxygen 11, which was upgraded to oxygen 12 and then VoNR was turned on (no luck in my market) still reporting n25 with data sent to signalcheck.net. Will crosscheck with cellmapper and then will apply latest SCP update. Not rooted yet as waiting for bootloader unlock code.

N41 display fixes - what additional devices should we be checking?

I think a massive MIMO solution may also play well with mmWave, ie get it on the rebound. I do also see firms like T-Mobile using it around sites so the bulk of the 2.5Mhz spectrum is not siphoned off by close-in users. I also see the build-out requirements on some mmWave ultimately pushing them to use it around busy freeway interchanges like they have done in Seattle. Of course physics being as they may, 12/13Mhz may be even better.

That is Fixed Wireless, which iirc they should be able to aim in some fashion/ stay locked in. Still impressive.

https://www.lightreading.com/broadband/starry-still-fighting-as-it-faces-stock-delisting-/d/d-id/782456? Are you feeling lucky? Or just a loser?? At 2 cents a share you could make signicant money. Or lose it all.

I had already plused it. Only 47 have. How many are needed before Google really notices it?

Noticed with the production release on the s22+ factory unlocked latest firmware that the signal level is displayed as -- when set as band with signal level. Signal level itself works fine. The screen is set at defaults. Maybe I am missing something since this just seems to be a display issue. Any way for me to give it more space so it would display correctly? Seems to work fine on my other devices that I have checked. Thanks. P.S.: What is the best way for me to make comments on the mapping website?

n25 SA now active in Columbus. OH. Seen natively on a Moto G Stylus 5g 2021. 448/40. Switched to n41 SA with speed test. s22+ factory unlocked on n41 SA, which is still on Nov 1 update. Edit: Then tried a32 5g factory unlocked with Tello. Seen but no n25 connection. Tried moving T-Mobile sim/ sprint billing. No connection at all. Moved tello to moto g stylus 5g 2021. N25 only briefly seen. Otherwise n41 sa would then drop to n71 sa. Tried Boost on T-Mobile, but it operated on NSA only. Edit 2: Calls drop to LTE. When done NSA is added. Then stays there until airplane mode. Then connects to n41 SA which then drops to n25 SA in less optimal areas.

A new entry has appeared -- from a T-Mobile customer in an area mostly serviced by AT&T! https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=2106841583&attachmentKey=21650881&attachmentInd=applAttach It is listed as an incoming e-mail - not part of the record.

In my part of Columbus OH I am seeing them add a n25 site every few days. I was thinking they are skipping surrounding sites then doing another, but no longer certain of that. I am now mapping them on signalcheck, although I have left tracks on Cellmapper. I can track but can't connect to any on my Samsung A32 5G factory unlocked. This may or may not be my phone. I plan on getting n25 working on three other phones. Forcing on s21 ultra and 1+ nord n200 5g rooted with factory unlocked firmware. Waiting for an update on a s22+ factory unlocked that I sometimes can use.

The filing is so large it bogs down the FCC systems. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp?applID=13701739 I got on at about 5am. There are 1728 parties to this at a minimum: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAgreements.jsp?applID=13701739 Basically AT&T is trying to put T-Mobile's entire spectrum holdings on trial, but specifically its mid-band holdings. Here are the pleadings: AT&T petition to Deny T-Mobile's Long Form Application entered 11/7/22: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=901738970&attachmentKey=21623913&attachmentInd=applAttach T-Mobile Opposition to Deny [Reply] entered 11/14/22: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=531424994&attachmentKey=21628501&attachmentInd=applAttach AT&T Reply in Support of Opposition [rebuttal] entered 11/21/22: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=786221504&attachmentKey=21633784&attachmentInd=applAttach Most interesting Exhibits: Amended and restated mobile spectrum holdings: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=332091001&attachmentKey=21624009&attachmentInd=applAttach Not sure who filed this. Note that it includes 800Mhz holdings (not in use) that T-Mobile is required to sell to Dish at a preset price if Dish agrees else auction off at a preset price or better and only then can take back. Also note that it does not take into account international border issues that dramatically reduce 800Mhz spectrum as far south as Columbus, OH. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=1198355413&attachmentKey=21597648&attachmentInd=applAttach T-Mobile is on course to legally become a German subsidiary. A political mistake IMO. AT&T's plan is likely to stall if they can until the Senate approves another democratic FCC commissioner, and try to have the commissioners to decide this. It could also go to the courts. Worst case, basically a redo of the anti-trust trial. Or it could just be dismissed after taking up time. T-Mobile is already denied the opportunity to brag about this during Christmas, the biggest phone sales quarter iirc plus capital poorly deployed getting rural sites ready for 2.5Ghz as a result of this petition. Edit add-on: Basically AT&T is a master of the political process from their years of setting up tariffs, anti-trust, mergers, etc. Winning FirstNet caused them to dramatically improve their rural coverage. 2.5Ghz threatens that big time. Far cheaper to legally dispute rather than to cover rural areas with n77, which they have delayed waiting for one radio to cover c-band and DOD for their one climb strategy. Other possibility: Dish gets a better deal on 800MHz for immediate takeover in exchange for publicly supporting T-Mobile.

Neville tweet: We've taken @TMobile's #5G standalone core to the next level 🙌 In partnership with @Cisco, 5G AND 4G traffic has moved to the 🌎's largest highly scalable cloud native 5G gateway. Giving #Uncarrier users a 10% 📈 in speed & 📉 latency!

I need to figure out where it fits in the FCC system. Current getting a 504 Gateway Time-out error when I try to lookup the original documents. Extemely rough guess would be at least 60 days. Not a topic in the next commisioners open meeting (may not even need their input).

This should add both in many areas. Basically because T-Mobile has seeded so many 5g phones, they are getting rolling on n25. The even bigger flip the switch moment will be when the can activate the rural n41 licenses they recently won. They just have to wait out the challenge clock set in motion by AT&T and possibly others.

Link to video?

I have the same constrains as you on the T-Mobile and Starlink offerings. Have somewhat reasonable service from Charter. VDSL from AT&T is maintained purely for redundancy purposes and would be the one I would switch. Would be awesome if they upgraded it to fiber, but that remains just a dream. The one area I have not tried is IPv6 VPN. Have any others used this on T-Mobile's WISP offering?

Mike, in case you are feeling lucky, I sent in diags when on n41 from my s21 ultra U1 (factory unlocked) which can still use samsung band selector app. Both *#0011* and cellmapper can see the n41. The s22+ U1 has T-Mobile esim and USMobile (Verizon) psim. Cellmapper can see both, but often gets confused in the carrier display. The latest production SCP can not see the Verizon network. Did notice no web update in production version so maybe other differences? Thanks. Edit: I also sent diags in on the s22+ with two networks.

It works on the Samsung Galaxy A32 5g , which was one of the "free" T-Mobile 5g phones, and also the factory unlocked firmware. Thanks for all your hard work Mike.

More clearly stated here: https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/13/23506626/t-mobile-5g-1900mhz-pcs-carrier-aggregation-sprint-3g-lte

I reread everthing and can see where you are coming from. Some aspects are definately foward looking: “We’re rapidly executing on our vision to deliver the highest capacity network this country has ever seen". I need to test on a s22, but that phone is currently not available to me for a few more days.

A reverse compliment for T-Mobile: https://www.rcrwireless.com/20221212/carriers/kagan-what-verizon-and-att-should-learn-from-t-mobile-us

Starlink is supposed to operate more like roaming.