Jump to content

kg4icg

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    1,395
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by kg4icg

  1. 5 minutes ago, gusherb said:

    It's really not like they can do anything different than TMO. TBH I want them to follow what TMO did as far as network improvement goes. What they've been doing has been different from TMO's strategy and it has failed left and right. People are not gonna let Sprint live things down for a long long time and that's just the way it's gonna be. Ultimately in the long run, rebranding with a new name will help this. 

    1

    Can't do what T-Mobile did, 2 different types of networks. Plus Sprint did a total network rebuild, T-Mobile at first did add ons after getting money from AT&T and then start on partial rebuild.

     

  2. 5 minutes ago, RedSpark said:

    Check this out from March 2017: https://dc.curbed.com/2017/3/21/15006154/population-density-dc-washington

    According to the infographic:

    672,228 people live within Washington's 61 Square Miles. That gives it a population density of 11,020 persons per Square Mile.

    The graphic compares its density to other cities, some of which are on the Press Release:

    Chicago

    Houston

    Los Angeles

    I wonder if "Washington, DC" according to Sprint also includes surrounding areas in MD/VA.

    Yes I think it does. Got this in Ashburn which is part of  DC market 

    Screenshot_20171013-102802.png

    • Like 1
  3. 21 minutes ago, RedSpark said:

    It's interesting to see the disparity in performance/improvement across the different markets.

    Atlanta – Up 86% to 32 Mbps

    LA Metro – Up 55% to 23 Mbps

    Chicago – Up 61% to 32 Mbps

    Minnesota – Up 64% to 29 Mbps

    Colorado – Up 44% to 25 Mbps

    San Diego – Up 48% to 20 Mbps

    Houston – Up 43% to 22 Mbps

    Seattle – Up 40% to 35 Mbps

    Indianapolis – Up 61% to 35 Mbps

    Washington DC – Up 45% to 20 Mbps

    The improvement percentage for Atlanta is substantial.

    How is DC still among the slowest markets? I thought a third carrier of Band 41 was deployed here?

    Well when you consider population density of each and the size of the area.

  4. 45 minutes ago, WiseGuy321 said:

    This is correct. In the medical world, I prefer Apple hardware. For example, the software I use to read scans is far better optimized for iOS/OS X than PC/Androids. I've used Windows desktops + laptops with high-res displays and there hasn't been a single one without image scaling problems across the OS. This is important because size + shape is used as a method of diagnosis. 

    Another example is as simple as looking through MRIs on my phone. If I'm quickly flipping through the scans, Android phones typically can't keep up. There is lag and choppiness. I experience none of this with an iPhone or iPad.

    These arguments are a waste of time. Why do PC/Android guys feel so strongly against Apple's ecosystem?

    If people want to call me "tech illiterate" and a "sheep" for using the best tools to diagnose my patients, so be it. 

    Because of cost and upgradability, for example, as I can upgrade my ram and my ssd in my Dell Inspiron, where on a MacBook they are soldered in. 

  5. 12 minutes ago, WiseGuy321 said:

    Interesting, but who else offers in-store replacements at the Genius Bar?

    Google + Pixel? Nope

    HTC? Nope

    Samsung? Nope

    LG? Nope

    Even a company as large as Samsung doesn't offer flat-rate screen replacements for their products. There's a price to pay for superior customer service. Why are we acting like Apple is suddenly doing something different?

    Both my HTC's came  with a Quickcharge adapter. You might want to do some research. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...