Jump to content

Public WiFi Use Agreements - Why Aren't They Persistent Based On MAC Address?

caspar347

By caspar347
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

caspar347 Member Level: 4G WiMax

caspar347

Posted
Posted

I was agreeing to the useage terms for Harris Teeter public WiFi for the millionth time (the closest Sprint site a mile away provides only 1x towards the back of the store) and it occurred to me: couldn't large-scale public WiFi "remember" devices that previously agreed to their usage agreements based on MAC and let those devices bypass their terms screens upon connection? Are there reasons this isn't a thing already?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
swintec Member Level: eHRPD

swintec

Posted
Posted

What if you sell your device?  Let your spouse / friend use your device?  You cant agree to terms for someone else.

 

I was going to say make it a cookie to remember for X days, but I suppose you would still run the risk of above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
caspar347 Member Level: 4G WiMax

caspar347

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What if you sell your device? Let your spouse / friend use your device? You cant agree to terms for someone else.

 

I was going to say make it a cookie to remember for X days, but I suppose you would still run the risk of above.

Ahh. Makes sense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JWMaloney Member Level: eHRPD

JWMaloney

Posted
Posted

Xfinity Wi-Fi actually does work like that. Since it's often *open* but not necessarily *free*, your device's MAX is added to your Comcast account when you sign in.

 

This actually answers the other concern as well, as you can manage / remove devices from your account page. Their app will even use EAP automatically for security with compatible access points.

 

I believe AT&T may have a similar automatic connection feature on certain branded devices.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
greenbastard Member Level: 4G WiMax

greenbastard

Posted
Posted

Xfinity Wi-Fi actually does work like that. Since it's often *open* but not necessarily *free*, your device's MAX is added to your Comcast account when you sign in.

 

This actually answers the other concern as well, as you can manage / remove devices from your account page. Their app will even use EAP automatically for security with compatible access points.

 

I believe AT&T may have a similar automatic connection feature on certain branded devices.

I can attest to that. Xfinity requires a one time log in and after that you can leave WiFi on and pick it up in lots of places across town without hassle.

 

Unfortunately, driving through an Xfinity city with WiFi on will cause live streams to time out when picking up a WiFi signal. Galaxy S5 tends to hold on to WiFi too long, as a lot of devices do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Dkoellerwx
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Bubble Gum
    • chamb
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By chamb · Posted

      Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • Trip
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Trip · Posted

      It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • dkyeager
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By dkyeager · Posted

      T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...