Jump to content

The Snapdragon 805 doesn't have an embedded modem.


Ascertion

Recommended Posts

http://www.anandtech.com/show/8035/qualcomm-snapdragon-805-performance-preview

 

In order to accommodate the wider memory interface but still make Snapdragon 805 suitable for use in a smartphone as well as a tablet, Qualcomm turned to a different packaging technology. Since the Snapdragon 805 is an APQ part, it lacks the integrated modem of the MSM SoCs we've found in most of Qualcomm's recent flagships.

Won't this kill battery life since the radio will require an alternate power source now?

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.anandtech.com/show/8035/qualcomm-snapdragon-805-performance-preview

 

 

Won't this kill battery life since the radio will require an alternate power source now?

 

No.  While I would rather see the cellular baseband on the same SoC in an MSM configuration rather than an APQ configuration, the battery drain difference for the latter at this point is difficult to judge, hence minimal.

 

And I think that Anand overstates the case when he says "most of Qualcomm's recent flagships."  Last year, the HTC One, Samsung Galaxy S4, LG Optimus G, et al., all used separate Snapdragon APQ and Gobi MDM chipsets.  This seems to be a cycle with Qualcomm.  The year prior, most of the flagships -- such as the Samsung Galaxy S3 -- were on an MSM platform, thus incorporating both processor and baseband onto the same SoC.

 

So, much of 2014 will be APQ plus MDM.  Then, 2015 will be focused on a new flagship MSM that combines both processor and baseband.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure all the upcoming chips past the 805 are integrated solutions. Somewhat the reason why you haven't seen crazy adoption rate of it in the first place. My suspicion is that it will land in "most" of these 5.5" devices coming. End of this year we will see the 600 series and 808/810 rolling out... Kinda a wash honestly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't realize 805 was going to be the end of the line for Krait. RIP.

 

The good news is that the MDM9635 is a significant step forward in number of LTE bands and connectivity. I'm hoping this leads to Sprint handsets supporting all the LTE and TD-LTE bands for the US, Canada, Europe, Japan, and China. My hypothetical band support setup?

 

CDMA 1X/EVDO: Band Class 0, 1, 10, (Cellular, PCS, Secondary Cellular)

GSM: 800,900,1800,1900

UMTS: 850,900,AWS,1900,2100

LTE: 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,13,17,20,25,26,38,39,40,41

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDMA 1X/EVDO: Band Class 0, 1, 10, (Cellular, PCS, Secondary Cellular)

GSM: 800,900,1800,1900

UMTS: 850,900,AWS,1900,2100

LTE: 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,13,17,20,25,26,38,39,40,41

 

But what about…?

 

kitchen_sink.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't realize 805 was going to be the end of the line for Krait. RIP.

 

It seems the general consensus is that Qualcomm will release their own 64-bit architecture after next year's SD 808/810. Anand hinted as much in an earlier article:

 

Unlike the rest of the 64-bit Snapdragon family, the 808 and 810 likely won't show up in devices until the first half of 2015 (410 devices will arrive in Q3 2014, while 610/615 will hit in Q4). The 810 will come first (and show up roughly two quarters after the Snapdragon 805, which will show up two quarters after the recently released 801). The 808 will follow shortly thereafter. This likely means we won't see Qualcomm's own 64-bit CPU microarchitecture show up in products until the second half of next year.

 

I don't think anyone outside of Qualcomm knows yet what that architecture will look like. But the Galaxy S7 and its contemporaries will likely use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...