Jump to content

Permits on towers?


Recommended Posts

So I have been curious that with all the holdup on the LTE deployment apparently from what I've read on other forums it seems to be caused by either birds or permits on towers. Why would you need a permit to work on a tower? AT&T, Verizon, and T-mobile all got their towers upgraded quick without permit holdups, so what's the deal with Sprint?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I have been curious that with all the holdup on the LTE deployment apparently from what I've read on other forums it seems to be caused by either birds or permits on towers. Why would you need a permit to work on a tower? AT&T, Verizon, and T-mobile all got their towers upgraded quick without permit holdups, so what's the deal with Sprint?

Really now? Verizon has had problems with permits, and some of their permits in Vegas took 3 years to be approved. AT&T has had similar delays in Vegas. T-Mobile is having delays too. Hmm.... I think you've been suffering from mis-information.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has been discussed ad nauseaum around our forums.  We aren't going to have a new thread on this, especially with how it is being started.  The OP needs to read around the site first.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take the bait incase others see this post.

 

Permits are almost always required in order for tower work to begin. Permits are required for everything above a certain valuation ($5,000/10,000+ etc) and tower work is typically in the thousands of dollars of range for valuations. In addition to valuation, material changes that also costs a certain amount of money and / or fundamentally changes a structure (cell towers / office cell sites / etc) also requires a permit.

 

A permit, depending on area, has certain requirements that must be met in order to be issued. If one proceeds to work without a permit issued you will get fined Nx the cost for a regular one, stop work, and apply for one and then pay for it again.

 

This is a typical building permit application for Sprint AFTER negotiations with the site owner and local entities including zoning. 

 

4XQh7XQ.png

 

Note the time of application to time of issuance. 

 

Some areas take more time such as Berkeley or Hawaii which takes well over 9 - 12 months (year(s) sometimes) but typically 3-6 months is how long it takes for an average urban area to get a permit issued. Others, such as county or rural areas can just be done in a day (walk in) or a few weeks which incidentally are where a lot of upgraded Sprint sites and LTE is available at. Can't have LTE if you can't upgrade the equipment which you cannot do if you don't have permission from the.... you guessed it.. government. 

 

In addition, the manner of just exactly what the applicant wants to do also impacts how fast a permit gets issued. Sprint is completely tearing everything out. All old electrical wiring, coax cables, old cabinets, and old antennas are going to be removed and replaced by new antennas, radio heads, cabinets, hybridflex wiring, and electrical equipment. Due to this multiple government departments are going to need to review the permits and do inspections to make sure you don't burn a tower down or topple a tower due to wind load or improperly engineered designs. 

 

As can see in the permit above you have things like Life Safety, Electrical, Fire, Planning, and Structural reviews. Fail any one of those reviews and you have to resubmit and wait for them to review it again. It is an extremely time consuming to do.

 

On the other hand what ATT, Tmobile, or Verizon does is far simpler. ATT and Verizon nowadays are mostly adding a remote radio head to existing antenna setups to enable AWS or other LTE bands. This does not require much in the way of any engineering as it does not fundamentally alter the setup of a tower. In addition to that they also do not rip out everything on the ground in the leased areas like cabinets and electrical wiring which is another headache. 

 

Tmobile Ericsson is also similar in that all they need to do is replace antennas with new Ericsson AIR's or RRUs. They also go through a semi lengthy review process but the fact that they do not touch ground equipment at all makes their permitting go through far quicker.  Nokia Solutions & Networks may also face similar time frames as Sprint in their vendor regions but the fact that they already have upgraded backhaul in place makes it appear that they're deploying faster than Sprint as Sprint may be upgrading at the same pace but 1/2 to 2/3rds of their sites are still waiting on backhaul from a LEC in order to fire up LTE. 

 

Lots of variables. 

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was in Red Hook again and I swear there are more Link5G sites as there are Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T small cells combined in the entire neighborhood. It seemed like every other street I turned down had one installed. Hopefully carriers will start hopping on them soon. Seems like a lot of effort to go through for no one to use them.  — — — — — T-Mobile converted the Sprint site on top of NYU Langone Brooklyn in Sunset Park. I first mapped one sector of it back in November 2023 but I thought it was a small cell so I never pinned it but I ran into another sector today which caught me off guard. I'm unable to find a permit for the conversion so it's definitely a surprise. There's another T-Mobile site 1 block away that T-Mobile initially installed back in 2019 so I'm kinda surprised they're keeping both considering the Sprint conversion is on a much taller building and coule potentially provide much better coverage to the entire area.  — — — — — The old permit expired for this site without any work being done but a new permit was just approved a few days ago for a T-Mobile site at this address. Description mentions 3 antennas with 2 RRUs per sector. My guess is they're doing something similar to what they did at 360 Furman St in Brooklyn where they broadcast Band 2/66 and n25/41 from one antenna. It's a bit of a downgrade considering the site it's replacing was a full build with Ericsson 6449s. 
    • Still not seeing any ULS postings for pending T-Mobile UScellular merger in Dane county Wisconsin.
    • Came across another Crown Castle Solutions multi-tenant oDAS node in Brooklyn. Located at 40.7002286, -73.9612666. Nothing on T-Mobile or AT&T so I'm assuming these are all Verizon nodes that Crown Castle is anticipating another carrier will hop on down the line.
    • Same with factory unlocked
    • June security update is out (S22U TMO)
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...