Jump to content

Two TV stations to share one Channel


chamb

Recommended Posts

http://www.slashgear.com/two-tv-stations-will-try-sharing-one-channel-so-your-lte-can-get-faster-28314825/?

 

Two LA TV stations will simultaneously share a single channel for broadcasts, as a pilot program to demonstrate not only that the technology works with no downside for viewers, but that it can be a valuable source of cash too. The scheme will see KLCS "hosting" KJLA's----

 

This has been something I have thought of for some time.  I sometimes see a station have one HD broadcast with 3 low quality worthless secondary channels.   Why not have only TWO feeds(even competitors) both with decent quality.  There is no reason why two competitors can not share the transmitter equipment and the cost.  Then a channel becomes free to sell for cash.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.slashgear.com/two-tv-stations-will-try-sharing-one-channel-so-your-lte-can-get-faster-28314825/?

 

Two LA TV stations will simultaneously share a single channel for broadcasts, as a pilot program to demonstrate not only that the technology works with no downside for viewers, but that it can be a valuable source of cash too. The scheme will see KLCS "hosting" KJLA's----

 

This has been something I have thought of for some time.  I sometimes see a station have one HD broadcast with 3 low quality worthless secondary channels.   Why not have only TWO feeds(even competitors) both with decent quality.  There is no reason why two competitors can not share the transmitter equipment and the cost.  Then a channel becomes free to sell for cash.

 

Those secondary channel is not worthless. They still get paid by cables as re-transmission fee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those secondary channel is not worthless. They still get paid by cables as re-transmission fee

In most areas, some of the major stations do have a good secondary channel or two.  But I also see some channels that are occupied with worthless crap on the primary HD channel and more worthless crap on the secondary channels.  It is way past time for some consolidation and put the bandwidth into use for something worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was/is a blog post on rabbitears.info conceptualizing ATSC 2.0 and how the standard would have two stations shareone channel. I can't find it at the moment though.

 

 It is way past time for some consolidation and put the bandwidth into use for something worthwhile.

 

"Worthwhile" is very subjective.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am curious to see the results of this testing.  Hopefully it means that coexistence can occur and that the 600 MHz auction can be a success.  I know Sprint and Tmobile really are depending on the availability of this spectrum.  But after the 600 MHz auction, the FCC should stop and leave the remaining low band spectrum to the TV broadcasters. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
    • Welcome back! That's similar to my best (1250ish). A few people have broken 2000 on good sites. 
    • Lots of new multi-carrier nodes popping up in Bushwick. Crown Castle Fiber node at Ridgewood & Palmetto:   Crown Castle Solutions node at Irving & Jefferson:   Crown Castle Solutions node at Wilson & Noll:  
    • I’m surprised they’re running a 5x5 Band 66 carrier still. In NYC T-Mobile has 25x25 AWS and they’re running 20x20 Band 66 and 5x5 n66 (in testing). Presumably when n66 commercially launches they’ll drop Band 66 down to 15x15 and go straight for a 10x10 n66 carrier like they did with n25. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...