Jump to content

Tmobile looking at Verizon's 700mhz spectrum


IamMrFamous07

Recommended Posts

Remapped channels are a headache for us RF guys.

 

At the family's vacation home over the weekend, we had one inexplicably broken LNB that prevented reception of the 103° W orbital satellite, which transmits the local affiliate feeds. I had to jury rig a solution with a UHF antenna so that we could try to pick up the Chiefs-Broncos game OTA. But I had to go online to double check that the Albuquerque NBC affiliate, KOB, which has long been known for its position on low VHF channel 4, had moved to UHF with the ATSC transition. Indeed, it had moved its physical channel to UHF channel 26, remapped to virtual channel 4. And my UHF antenna solution worked. But the antenna did not pick up the local CBS affiliate, which had moved back to its high VHF channel 13 position, hence my need to confirm the NBC affiliate physical channel had gone UHF.

 

AJ

Where is your vacation home here in nm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like AT&T wants to cause some disruption in Tmobile's plan to bid on the 700 MHz A block spectrum from Verizon.  I really hope AT&T is not allowed to buy the 700 MHz A block spectrum from Verizon.  If ATT does win this 700 MHz A block spectrum, they should be barred from participating in the 600 MHz auction.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/report-att-vying-t-mobile-verizons-700-mhz-block-spectrum/2013-12-05

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is your vacation home here in nm?

 

About five miles west of Santa Fe.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pojoaque? Tesuque?

 

Pojoaque and Tesuque are too far north.  Pojoaque is basically where Robert lived.  No, this is a few miles off the Relief Route due west of Santa Fe.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pojoaque and Tesuque are too far north.  Pojoaque is basically where Robert lived.  No, this is a few miles off the Relief Route due west of Santa Fe.

 

AJ

Surprisingly when i lived in Santa Fe, I lived close to what is the relief route and airport road.  It used to be way out there.  Now it is just a thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprisingly when i lived in Santa Fe, I lived close to what is the relief route and airport road.  It used to be way out there.  Now it is just a thought. 

 

Yep, we drive through the arroyo on Paseo de River and hit the Relief Route at Airport Road whenever coming and going from Albuquerque.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, we drive through the arroyo on Paseo de River and hit the Relief Route at Airport Road whenever coming and going from Albuquerque.

 

AJ

 

So I wonder what they meant by/or why they called it Relief Route? 

 

HMMMMM....

 

sweet-jesus-have-mercy.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I wonder what they meant by/or why they called it Relief Route? 

 

Two things: relief from traffic and radioactive waste transit through the heart of Santa Fe.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the FCC is committed to 4 nation wide carriers it cannot do a half arsed job, it has to give the two 'smaller' carriers a shot at sub gig spectrum (I know sprint have 800mhz, but I mean a significant chunk like 20-40MHz). The big two are not exactly innovating, their pricing usually all but matches each other, they roll out service pretty much as it suits their marketing department unlike Sprint who seems to be rolling it out as fast as it can or tmo who seems to be doing it as quickly as they can afford. Sprint and tmo cannot be 'token competitors'. Whilst Sprint is doing a good job these days they still need a decent chunk of low dial spectrum and to have a chance at expanding coverage. It would be nice to see them both get some assistance to level they playing field. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things: relief from traffic and radioactive waste transit through the heart of Santa Fe.

 

AJ

If there is anything people need relief from, it's Santa Fe traffic. Driving down Cerrillos or St. Francis at rush hour is enough to make someone batty. I actually preferred driving in ABQ.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New report that Verizon is open to swapping spectrum for 700 MHz A block.  I see this as an opportunity for Verizon to dominate the AWS spectrum as well by asking Tmobile to swap some of its AWS spectrum in exchange for some 700 MHz A blocks.  I wonder if Tmobile will bite on this.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-open-swapping-spectrum-700-mhz-block/2013-12-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New report that Verizon is open to swapping spectrum for 700 MHz A block.  I see this as an opportunity for Verizon to dominate the AWS spectrum as well by asking Tmobile to swap some of its AWS spectrum in exchange for some 700 MHz A blocks.  I wonder if Tmobile will bite on this.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-open-swapping-spectrum-700-mhz-block/2013-12-11

I don't see how swap could be a solution for T-Mobile since their AWS is all deployed. I can only think of AWS rich market like Dallas where they could shut down their A block and divest to Verizon, but they'll still pay a lot of money for 700Mhz A so not sure if that'd make much sense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how swap could be a solution for T-Mobile since their AWS is all deployed. I can only think of AWS rich market like Dallas where they could shut down their A block and divest to Verizon, but they'll still pay a lot of money for 700Mhz A so not sure if that'd make much sense...

 

Tmobile's goal is still to eventually move HSPA+ off of AWS and onto PCS correct?  However in the time frame that Verizon needs to sell its 700 MHz A block spectrum, I don't see how this can happen.

 

Honestly I don't really want to see Verizon get any stronger with more AWS spectrum.  I would rather just see Verizon cash out on the 700 MHz A block spectrum and move on.  They have a 20x20 LTE AWS block in the eastern half of the US already and I don't think they need anymore.  Perhaps the goal for Verizon in the 700 MHz A block swap would be to fill in the gaps on the western half of the US so that it holds more than just a 10x10 LTE block of AWS spectrum.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how swap could be a solution for T-Mobile since their AWS is all deployed. I can only think of AWS rich market like Dallas where they could shut down their A block and divest to Verizon, but they'll still pay a lot of money for 700Mhz A so not sure if that'd make much sense...

 

VZW seems ready to divest its Lower 700 MHz A block licenses in as many markets as possible.  Meanwhile, in exchange, T-Mobile might be willing to shed some AWS spectrum across numerous secondary and tertiary markets.  After all, let us be honest -- T-Mobile for years has shown tepid interest in updating those markets.  It seems more than content to be the new "MetroPCS."  And VZW has a much higher proportion of its subs outside of the top 100 markets, so it may need the smaller market AWS spectrum far more than T-Mobile does.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VZW seems ready to divest its Lower 700 MHz A block licenses in as many markets as possible.  Meanwhile, in exchange, T-Mobile might be willing to shed some AWS spectrum across numerous secondary and tertiary markets.  After all, let us be honest -- T-Mobile for years has shown tepid interest in updating those markets.  It seems more than content to be the new "MetroPCS."  And VZW has a much higher proportion of its subs outside of the top 100 markets, so it may need the smaller market AWS spectrum far more than T-Mobile does.

 

AJ

That actually make pretty good sense, assuming those markets still have sufficient amount of left over AWS and PCS so that voice remains uninterrupted and HSPA/LTE service could be deployed. I'd much rather see T-Mobile acquiring 700Mhz A from smaller smaller providers or spectrum holders in those secondary markets for rural deployment, but oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...