Jump to content

Can a 4G only upgraded tower have worse 3G performance?


Recommended Posts

So I have something anecdotal I've been noticing, and i'd like to know if it's just my imagination or if there could be something to it:

 

I've noticed that many times, once a tower has been upgraded for 4G (and 3G is not accepted, meaning I assume that 3G is still using legacy equipment), I often notice that the 3G signal is slightly weaker, or that speed is lower than it previously was and phones roam more often. Is it possibly because when they're putting up the new equipment they are messing up the alignment of the legacy equipment? Is there any reason that this would happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gotten 2.7mbps speed test on sprint legacy 3g at my local tower but since 4G came live, I haven't gotten anything over 2.25. I'm not saying that's bad and of course there's likely more people on sprint now sharing that site but I got better speeds on legacy 3g than never 3g. Nv speeds are way better on the upload side, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I have something anecdotal I've been noticing, and i'd like to know if it's just my imagination or if there could be something to it:

 

I've noticed that many times, once a tower has been upgraded for 4G (and 3G is not accepted, meaning I assume that 3G is still using legacy equipment), I often notice that the 3G signal is slightly weaker, or that speed is lower than it previously was and phones roam more often. Is it possibly because when they're putting up the new equipment they are messing up the alignment of the legacy equipment? Is there any reason that this would happen?

 

Some sites require removing one of the legacy panels to make room for the NV equipment. It likely could be related to that if the site has a space limitation like that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gotten 2.7mbps speed test on sprint legacy 3g at my local tower but since 4G came live, I haven't gotten anything over 2.25. I'm not saying that's bad and of course there's likely more people on sprint now sharing that site but I got better speeds on legacy 3g than never 3g. Nv speeds are way better on the upload side, though.

 

2.25Mbps speeds still require the sector/channel to be virtually unburdened.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To only confuse matters more, some sites will get 3g accepted for voice one day then a few days or even months later is EVDO moved over to the NV equipment and legacy shut off completely.

this is exactly true in my case.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

had a quick question my tower has the equipment needed for nv like cabniets rru and antenna ect. but its not even 3g accepted yet lol so im lost, about 3 towers near me went 4g live this week and mines isnt even 3g accepted yet any takers?  :td:  :blush:  :ninja:

P.s I live in south jersey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

had a quick question my tower has the equipment needed for nv like cabniets rru and antenna ect. but its not even 3g accepted yet lol so im lost, about 3 towers near me went 4g live this week and mines isnt even 3g accepted yet any takers? :td::blush::ninja:

P.s I live in south jersey

We have seen sites site for 12 months with no acceptances but they look complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile wins more 5G spectrum over AT&T's objections So now it's official?
    • Just got back from Puerto Rico. I spent a lot of time going around the San Juan metro area, predominantly in Viejo San Juan, Santurce, Isla Verde, and a short stop in University Gardens.  T-Mobile's network still performs as well today as it did when I last tested and in my opinion is the best on the island. n41 is still at 100MHz in most areas though I did record a few areas with only 80MHz. Yesterday the FCC announced that they're finally granting T-Mobile their Auction 108 winnings so we'll probably finally see that increase. They also have 15MHz of n25 and 15MHz of n25 and 15MHz n71. The fastest speed I recorded while there was 922 down and 120 up, presumably aggregating n41+n25 and potentially n71 as well but I wasn't able to confirm that. A couple of things I noticed about their network are that their is a ton of split-sector n25 deployed in San Juan, much like in the U.S. I even noticed some n41 sites that had 4 or more sectors. The weirdest being the site on top of SJU Airport where they have 6 n41 sectors each broadcasting 80MHz of n41. AT&T SIMs roam on LIberty's network but they still treat it as the home network. In my opinion they're the second best network in Puerto Rico. Liberty is still using the AT&T MCC-MNC code and is pretty much coasting on AT&T's network upgrades. They have 10MHz n5 virtually everywhere but I never saw my phone connect to any other 5G bands. Their saving grace was just how much spectrum they have to aggregate across midband and lowband. I'd see combos like 10MHz n5 + 20MHz B2 + 10MHz B66 + 10MHz Band 30 + 5MHz Band 2 and get upwards of 200Mbps. Coverage was slightly worse than T-Mobile in my experience, even indoors which is a surprise given T-Mobile usually struggles a bit indoors due to their macro density. Verizon is roaming on Claro in Puerto Rico just as they have been for years. No idea if there is 5G roaming because I was connected to LTE the entire time. Toggling 5G didn't do anything and both pings and speeds weren't great. Speeds were in the 20-40Mbps range consistently and pings over 200ms. For comparison T-Mobile's pings are in the teens and Liberty pings are in the 40's even when roaming using an AT&T SIM. Claro's network is ok in my experience with nothing really notable about it.  — — — — — Here are some pics of sites that I took:
    • WTB instructed to process all 2.5GHz licenses across the USA. They are only giving up some spectrum in certain markets of Hawaii.
    • Is this just for licenses in Hawaii?
    • Yeah, it basically directs the bureau to proceed with granting the applications in the normal course.  It's no longer being held by the AT&T objection. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...